- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete G5. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Markdabeast1
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Markdabeast1 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Northing here suggests any notability. The refs are trivial and self-serving. Nothing reliable and independent. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 23:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose clearly passes WP:GNG and also WP:ENT even though does not override the former as it is under the "Additonal criteria" section of the Notability policy. Meeting it only makes it more likely to be notable, but it does not guarantee it and the reverse also holds true; not meeting the additional criteria does not mean the subject in question is not notable. It meets the basic criteria as multiple reliable sources have been covered in his modeling career Even if WP:ENT did override WP:GNG, the subject in the article still meets criteria n°2 and possibly n°3. Londonboy88 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete G5. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Markdabeast1
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Markdabeast1 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Northing here suggests any notability. The refs are trivial and self-serving. Nothing reliable and independent. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 23:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose clearly passes WP:GNG and also WP:ENT even though does not override the former as it is under the "Additonal criteria" section of the Notability policy. Meeting it only makes it more likely to be notable, but it does not guarantee it and the reverse also holds true; not meeting the additional criteria does not mean the subject in question is not notable. It meets the basic criteria as multiple reliable sources have been covered in his modeling career Even if WP:ENT did override WP:GNG, the subject in the article still meets criteria n°2 and possibly n°3. Londonboy88 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.