From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to International Conference on Computer Vision. Merge any relevant material and then redirect to target -- RoySmith (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Mark Everingham Prize

Mark Everingham Prize (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was dePRODed by its author. While this prize may well be notable, there are concerns that insufficient third-party sources exist in order to comply with Wikipedia's notability criteria for stand-alone articles, and where the named recipients may not be notable according to WP:BLP, WP:LISTPEOPLE, and WP:NLIST. One solution may be merging to the main article at IEEE Computer Society. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAMI Young Researcher Award. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Merge with International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV, held in odd numbered years) and the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV, held in even numbered years). Fails to meet notability as a stand-alone article. Notably more awkward than with awards given at one conference consistently, but the division of the twin conferences is somewhat awkward in general. Within the articles, you could have a single paragraph explaining the award, linking to the sibling conference's Mark Everingham Prize section, and listing the awards given at that particular conference. –– Agyle ( talk) 22:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 21:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to International Conference on Computer Vision. Merge any relevant material and then redirect to target -- RoySmith (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Mark Everingham Prize

Mark Everingham Prize (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was dePRODed by its author. While this prize may well be notable, there are concerns that insufficient third-party sources exist in order to comply with Wikipedia's notability criteria for stand-alone articles, and where the named recipients may not be notable according to WP:BLP, WP:LISTPEOPLE, and WP:NLIST. One solution may be merging to the main article at IEEE Computer Society. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAMI Young Researcher Award. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Merge with International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV, held in odd numbered years) and the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV, held in even numbered years). Fails to meet notability as a stand-alone article. Notably more awkward than with awards given at one conference consistently, but the division of the twin conferences is somewhat awkward in general. Within the articles, you could have a single paragraph explaining the award, linking to the sibling conference's Mark Everingham Prize section, and listing the awards given at that particular conference. –– Agyle ( talk) 22:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 21:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook