The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I cannot find any reliable secondary sources for this topic, nor have there been any sources on the page since 2015. Has previously been rejected for speedy deletion but no major improvements to the page seem to have taken place since.
Cardiffbear88 (
talk)
15:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
MergeKeep seems quite notable per WP:NEXIST policy.
Many reliable sources exist - yet they are not in the article. They await an ambitious editor. In any event our policy does not call for delete based on the nominator's reasoning. Looks like one that can easily be improved.
Lightburst (
talk)
15:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect to
Dubai Marina, where residential complexes are listed. Would be improvement to that article without diminshioning integrity of this information. A better
Wikipedia:BEFORE would have been good, as there appears to other refs, and as one contributor mentioned likely enoough for GNG.
Djflem (
talk)
13:19, 10 November 2019 (UTC)reply
I appreciate you trying to turn this into an article, but I'm still a strong delete, though I think at least some of this information can be up-merged to
Dubai Marina. I ended up doing a full source review after a very bad experience with the first source as you'll see below, and there's not a single notability-granting source currently in the article:
1) Architect's website, apparently - I was directed to a browser-hijack webpage, so cannot confirm, but that's the reason why I ended up doing the full source review
2) Does not mention Marina Quays
3) I didn't see Marina Quays mentioned, but it's a scroll-thru-the-photos style article which I think we typically significantly downweight or exclude for notability purposes?
4) One mention of "Marina Quays," but it's not clear it's discussing the development
5) This is a real estate website
6) The "Sales and Leasing expert" mentioned the development's name and nothing
7&11) Emporis is a building database, not used for notability
8) Appears to be the official website of the Dubai Marina, Primary
Comment: These are exactly the kind of references one could expect to find unless we are talking about an internationally known building like the Empire State building. Thanks for the hard work Djflem! NBUILD this area and Marina Quays has social, economic importance Additionally the architecture feature of the cantilevered building, extending 20m over the Dubai Marina waterway is notable. A merge is not a terrible idea, my only concern is that the
Dubai Marina (target for merge) will likely be a bit long soon. Many of the notable topic headings have not been fleshed out or linked as of yet. Construction continues.
Lightburst (
talk)
15:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge Sources are pretty routine real estate content that don't appear to establish notability as any more than generic tall(ish) buildings people live in. They're luxury but can be covered in the main article with their lookalike neighbors.
Reywas92Talk20:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Still Delete (or Merge)Lightburst,
Djflem thank you both for your attention on this article. When I had originally nominated I had found a lot of these sources, but to me they did not seem to add to the notability of the article, as they were either sources that were overly promotional or sources that were clearly not independent. I’m a new editor so I’m very happy to stand corrected, but I still believe that this content does not merit a stand-alone article as per
WP:GNG.
Cardiffbear88 (
talk)
00:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I cannot find any reliable secondary sources for this topic, nor have there been any sources on the page since 2015. Has previously been rejected for speedy deletion but no major improvements to the page seem to have taken place since.
Cardiffbear88 (
talk)
15:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)reply
MergeKeep seems quite notable per WP:NEXIST policy.
Many reliable sources exist - yet they are not in the article. They await an ambitious editor. In any event our policy does not call for delete based on the nominator's reasoning. Looks like one that can easily be improved.
Lightburst (
talk)
15:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect to
Dubai Marina, where residential complexes are listed. Would be improvement to that article without diminshioning integrity of this information. A better
Wikipedia:BEFORE would have been good, as there appears to other refs, and as one contributor mentioned likely enoough for GNG.
Djflem (
talk)
13:19, 10 November 2019 (UTC)reply
I appreciate you trying to turn this into an article, but I'm still a strong delete, though I think at least some of this information can be up-merged to
Dubai Marina. I ended up doing a full source review after a very bad experience with the first source as you'll see below, and there's not a single notability-granting source currently in the article:
1) Architect's website, apparently - I was directed to a browser-hijack webpage, so cannot confirm, but that's the reason why I ended up doing the full source review
2) Does not mention Marina Quays
3) I didn't see Marina Quays mentioned, but it's a scroll-thru-the-photos style article which I think we typically significantly downweight or exclude for notability purposes?
4) One mention of "Marina Quays," but it's not clear it's discussing the development
5) This is a real estate website
6) The "Sales and Leasing expert" mentioned the development's name and nothing
7&11) Emporis is a building database, not used for notability
8) Appears to be the official website of the Dubai Marina, Primary
Comment: These are exactly the kind of references one could expect to find unless we are talking about an internationally known building like the Empire State building. Thanks for the hard work Djflem! NBUILD this area and Marina Quays has social, economic importance Additionally the architecture feature of the cantilevered building, extending 20m over the Dubai Marina waterway is notable. A merge is not a terrible idea, my only concern is that the
Dubai Marina (target for merge) will likely be a bit long soon. Many of the notable topic headings have not been fleshed out or linked as of yet. Construction continues.
Lightburst (
talk)
15:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge Sources are pretty routine real estate content that don't appear to establish notability as any more than generic tall(ish) buildings people live in. They're luxury but can be covered in the main article with their lookalike neighbors.
Reywas92Talk20:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Still Delete (or Merge)Lightburst,
Djflem thank you both for your attention on this article. When I had originally nominated I had found a lot of these sources, but to me they did not seem to add to the notability of the article, as they were either sources that were overly promotional or sources that were clearly not independent. I’m a new editor so I’m very happy to stand corrected, but I still believe that this content does not merit a stand-alone article as per
WP:GNG.
Cardiffbear88 (
talk)
00:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.