The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, the nominator has withdrawn their nomination without dissent. ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 18:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Not Notable. Not listed in Mapping L.A. or The Thomas Guide. Simply a small part of a true neighborhood, Venice, Los Angeles. No sources. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 15:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC) reply
"Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article. If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. . . . Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight. Such sources include [materials] that are promotional in nature. . . Primary sources . . . must be used with caution in order to avoid original research. While specific facts may be taken from primary sources, secondary sources that present the same material are preferred. Large blocks of material based purely on primary sources should be avoided. All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors."
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, the nominator has withdrawn their nomination without dissent. ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 18:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Not Notable. Not listed in Mapping L.A. or The Thomas Guide. Simply a small part of a true neighborhood, Venice, Los Angeles. No sources. GeorgeLouis ( talk) 15:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC) reply
"Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article. If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. . . . Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight. Such sources include [materials] that are promotional in nature. . . Primary sources . . . must be used with caution in order to avoid original research. While specific facts may be taken from primary sources, secondary sources that present the same material are preferred. Large blocks of material based purely on primary sources should be avoided. All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors."