The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
What? Õhtuleht isn't a database. It's the largest Estonian entertainment daily newspaper in Estonia and the articles easily pass
WP:SIGCOV. The first two Postimees articles are in depth and explicitly about the subject. None are merely "routine" coverage.
ExRat (
talk)
16:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Eesti Entsüklopeedia isn't a "database". It's literally the digitized Estonian encyclopedia. Eesti Teatrillit is the same. Only notable people have entries.
ExRat (
talk)
21:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)reply
"
Per Wikipedia policy, routine news coverage of such things as announcements are not sufficient basis for an article. Planned coverage of scheduled events, especially when those involved in the event are also promoting it, is considered to be routine. Wedding announcements, sports scores, crime logs, and other items that tend to get an exemption from newsworthiness discussions should be considered routine."
😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (
talk)
18:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)reply
In depth articles in major daily newspapers covering an actress's career and playing "this role" and "doing this" are indeed not routine announcements.
ExRat (
talk)
21:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - notable per entry in the non-profit, EU-backed national
Estonian Encyclopedia as noted by
ExRat above. See
WP:ANYBIO. Also notable per ExRat's 6 media article citations.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
What? Õhtuleht isn't a database. It's the largest Estonian entertainment daily newspaper in Estonia and the articles easily pass
WP:SIGCOV. The first two Postimees articles are in depth and explicitly about the subject. None are merely "routine" coverage.
ExRat (
talk)
16:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Eesti Entsüklopeedia isn't a "database". It's literally the digitized Estonian encyclopedia. Eesti Teatrillit is the same. Only notable people have entries.
ExRat (
talk)
21:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)reply
"
Per Wikipedia policy, routine news coverage of such things as announcements are not sufficient basis for an article. Planned coverage of scheduled events, especially when those involved in the event are also promoting it, is considered to be routine. Wedding announcements, sports scores, crime logs, and other items that tend to get an exemption from newsworthiness discussions should be considered routine."
😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (
talk)
18:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)reply
In depth articles in major daily newspapers covering an actress's career and playing "this role" and "doing this" are indeed not routine announcements.
ExRat (
talk)
21:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - notable per entry in the non-profit, EU-backed national
Estonian Encyclopedia as noted by
ExRat above. See
WP:ANYBIO. Also notable per ExRat's 6 media article citations.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.