From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Mansoorah, Lahore (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable headquarters of the Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Keep Mansoora, Lahore (a neighborhood town or city district within the city of Lahore, Pakistan) is often covered in all the major newspapers of Pakistan. Even before this nomination, this article had 2 references from The News International and The Express Tribune newspapers of Pakistan. My Google Search turned up 3 more Pakistani news media references including Samaa TV News website and 2 more newspaper references. So it's very notable, no doubt.

How did the deletion nominator determine that it's not notable? Seems like the nominator does not like Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan (a political and religious party in Pakistan). That's fine, he's entitled to his view. But trying to delete an existing Wikipedia article on a neighborhood district just because the political party is also based there, does not make sense. Besides, making a 'Personal point of view' WP:PPOV basis or reason for deletion is clearly in violation of Wikipedia policy. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 17:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 19:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Mansoorah, Lahore (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable headquarters of the Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Keep Mansoora, Lahore (a neighborhood town or city district within the city of Lahore, Pakistan) is often covered in all the major newspapers of Pakistan. Even before this nomination, this article had 2 references from The News International and The Express Tribune newspapers of Pakistan. My Google Search turned up 3 more Pakistani news media references including Samaa TV News website and 2 more newspaper references. So it's very notable, no doubt.

How did the deletion nominator determine that it's not notable? Seems like the nominator does not like Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan (a political and religious party in Pakistan). That's fine, he's entitled to his view. But trying to delete an existing Wikipedia article on a neighborhood district just because the political party is also based there, does not make sense. Besides, making a 'Personal point of view' WP:PPOV basis or reason for deletion is clearly in violation of Wikipedia policy. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 17:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 19:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook