The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable organization that fails to satisfy
WP:NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search linked me to unreliable sources which do not possess a reputation for fact checking nor possess editorial oversight. Furthermore, even the singular source used in the article clearly states it’s a sponsored post thus as unreliable as they come. Celestina007 (
talk)
01:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Draftify This company definitely does not have the sourcing to warrant an article at this time, however, since most of its works are still fairly new, it is definitely possible it could get more coverage down the line.
Link20XX (
talk)
03:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment A second source has been added, and Al Arabiya is RS (AFAIK), but the article is based on the company's press release, and in any case covers the film, not the company, so doesn't do anything to establish notability of the latter. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
07:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG /
WP:CORP. While I could live with draftifying, per the previous !vote, that would only make sense if this is likely to go from zero to notable in the space of a few months, of which we've no guarantee. I say delete now, and recreate later if and when notability exists. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
07:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non notable organization that fails to satisfy
WP:NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search linked me to unreliable sources which do not possess a reputation for fact checking nor possess editorial oversight. Furthermore, even the singular source used in the article clearly states it’s a sponsored post thus as unreliable as they come. Celestina007 (
talk)
01:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Draftify This company definitely does not have the sourcing to warrant an article at this time, however, since most of its works are still fairly new, it is definitely possible it could get more coverage down the line.
Link20XX (
talk)
03:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment A second source has been added, and Al Arabiya is RS (AFAIK), but the article is based on the company's press release, and in any case covers the film, not the company, so doesn't do anything to establish notability of the latter. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
07:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG /
WP:CORP. While I could live with draftifying, per the previous !vote, that would only make sense if this is likely to go from zero to notable in the space of a few months, of which we've no guarantee. I say delete now, and recreate later if and when notability exists. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
07:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.