- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 03:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mand Munda ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Described as a village with "a total number of 2 houses and the population of 2 of which 2 are males while 0 are females". Hardly a village; less than a city block even. Seems part of an autocreated run with little attention given to what was generated. Hyperbolick ( talk) 20:19, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- The source in the article has gone dead. Searching the live Indian census site draws a blank. Phil Bridger ( talk) 17:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The place appears to be officially recognised [1] [2]. Although it is not much of a village with only 2 persons, per WP:GEOLAND, it is presumed to be notable even if the population is very low or has been abandoned unless it can be shown that it is just a census tract. Hzh ( talk) 09:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Make this Keep for now for the reason given unless the nominator can show that this is merely a census tract. Hzh ( talk) 11:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Recognised settlement as confirmed by Hzh. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:12, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 03:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mand Munda ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Described as a village with "a total number of 2 houses and the population of 2 of which 2 are males while 0 are females". Hardly a village; less than a city block even. Seems part of an autocreated run with little attention given to what was generated. Hyperbolick ( talk) 20:19, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- The source in the article has gone dead. Searching the live Indian census site draws a blank. Phil Bridger ( talk) 17:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The place appears to be officially recognised [1] [2]. Although it is not much of a village with only 2 persons, per WP:GEOLAND, it is presumed to be notable even if the population is very low or has been abandoned unless it can be shown that it is just a census tract. Hzh ( talk) 09:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Make this Keep for now for the reason given unless the nominator can show that this is merely a census tract. Hzh ( talk) 11:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Recognised settlement as confirmed by Hzh. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:12, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.