The result was Smerge to craniopagus parasiticus. The condition is notable, but the name of the child is not necessary in order to document that. Keep arguments are not invalidated by this; the coverage is of an example of the condition not as a biography of the child. Guy ( Help!) 17:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply
This article is about a victim of circumstance... there is no need for Wikipedia to be the tabloid in this case. If there is anything truly notable here, merge it into Cojoined twins and leave a redirect. Doc's speedy was proper, and the restore was, in my view, not. ++ Lar: t/ c 11:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC) reply
*Keep - She (they) were the subject of major media coverage, including television appearances, ergo (they) were notable, despite for all the wrong reasons. The refs do need some work, however. Changed my recommendation to Merge to
craniopagus parasiticus with a redirect per
WP:BLP.
Mmoyer
16:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Smerge to craniopagus parasiticus. The condition is notable, but the name of the child is not necessary in order to document that. Keep arguments are not invalidated by this; the coverage is of an example of the condition not as a biography of the child. Guy ( Help!) 17:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply
This article is about a victim of circumstance... there is no need for Wikipedia to be the tabloid in this case. If there is anything truly notable here, merge it into Cojoined twins and leave a redirect. Doc's speedy was proper, and the restore was, in my view, not. ++ Lar: t/ c 11:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC) reply
*Keep - She (they) were the subject of major media coverage, including television appearances, ergo (they) were notable, despite for all the wrong reasons. The refs do need some work, however. Changed my recommendation to Merge to
craniopagus parasiticus with a redirect per
WP:BLP.
Mmoyer
16:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
reply