The result was no consensus. I discount the opinions by Mtiffany71, JMK, Saebvn and Solevita, because they are not based on Wikipedia policy or guidelines or are otherwise weakly argued. After subtracting them, we have a headcount of 10 keep (inc. rename) opinions and 9 delete opinions. This is no consensus to delete. Sandstein 05:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Egads, where to begin. What we have here is a split-personality article; the titled is a flash-in-the-pan neologism while the subject is essentially the List of candidates endorsed by Sarah Palin. WP:NEO addresses the former, while a simple WP:N covers the latter. We shouldn't have articles on neologisms until/unless they demonstrate lasting, historical significance, e.g. strategery, and while the drive-by media is fascinated by Palin 24/7, I see little to support the notion that an article solely about her endorsements is notable either. Many politicians endorse many candidates, there is nothing to suggest that Palin's are more notable than ex-presidents, senators, etc... Tarc ( talk) 17:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. I discount the opinions by Mtiffany71, JMK, Saebvn and Solevita, because they are not based on Wikipedia policy or guidelines or are otherwise weakly argued. After subtracting them, we have a headcount of 10 keep (inc. rename) opinions and 9 delete opinions. This is no consensus to delete. Sandstein 05:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Egads, where to begin. What we have here is a split-personality article; the titled is a flash-in-the-pan neologism while the subject is essentially the List of candidates endorsed by Sarah Palin. WP:NEO addresses the former, while a simple WP:N covers the latter. We shouldn't have articles on neologisms until/unless they demonstrate lasting, historical significance, e.g. strategery, and while the drive-by media is fascinated by Palin 24/7, I see little to support the notion that an article solely about her endorsements is notable either. Many politicians endorse many candidates, there is nothing to suggest that Palin's are more notable than ex-presidents, senators, etc... Tarc ( talk) 17:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC) reply