The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Rudeness wasn't the intention, so apologies if you were offended. Just a heads up that AfD closers may discount idem types of !votes. It's up to you to expound upon your !vote, or not. Cheers,
Northamerica1000(talk) 21:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Close what Jreferee said a company with over 24,000 employees is going to meet
WP:GNG.--
Jeffrd10 (
talk) 14:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - significant coverage in reliable sources determines notability, not the number of employees. However, it is more than likely that a company with a large workforce would also have received significant coverage.--
ukexpat (
talk) 14:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep as passing
WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include:
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6],
[7],
[8],
[9],
[10],
[11], and more are available. Promotional tone can be addressed by copy editing. Also, per
WP:NRVE, topic
notability on Wikipedia is based upon the availability of sources, rather than the state of sourcing in articles.
Northamerica1000(talk) 18:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Rudeness wasn't the intention, so apologies if you were offended. Just a heads up that AfD closers may discount idem types of !votes. It's up to you to expound upon your !vote, or not. Cheers,
Northamerica1000(talk) 21:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Close what Jreferee said a company with over 24,000 employees is going to meet
WP:GNG.--
Jeffrd10 (
talk) 14:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - significant coverage in reliable sources determines notability, not the number of employees. However, it is more than likely that a company with a large workforce would also have received significant coverage.--
ukexpat (
talk) 14:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep as passing
WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include:
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6],
[7],
[8],
[9],
[10],
[11], and more are available. Promotional tone can be addressed by copy editing. Also, per
WP:NRVE, topic
notability on Wikipedia is based upon the availability of sources, rather than the state of sourcing in articles.
Northamerica1000(talk) 18:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.