- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Although there were several keep !votes, none directly addressed the lack of in-depth sourcing. – Joe ( talk) 09:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maiko Yūki ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. It's unclear who called her "Japan's AV Girl of the Year", perhaps the film distribution company. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep The article seems to include information someone close would have, presumably not being written in an unbiased fashion. Since the article has survived thus far since it's creation back in 2007, it might be best to check back and possibly restore the article to a point where it had reliable sources (the current page seems to have some issues with it as well), or see if there are any current sources available now. - Handoto ( talk) 00:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The article needs some help (note the red notes in the Reference section) but it has some good information and companion articles written in six other languages in Wikipedia help to show this person's appeal. ₪Rickn Asia₪ 01:39, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of notability, hasn't won any notable or significant awards, fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 19:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep As pointed out above, there are six other language versions of this page. To me this shows international opinion that the article deserves a place on WP -- John B123 ( talk) 18:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. There is no claim of passing WP:PORNBIO, and references don't support passing WP:GNG. As for the keep arguments, a Wikipedia article's longevity is no indication of its subject's notability. The Porn Project has many 10-year-old articles that are getting cleaned out. Presence in other Wikipedia editions is a circular argument as they tend to copy from en.Wikipedia. The other articles also use the same or similar low quality references. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:37, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 08:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 08:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails NHOTTIE GNG etc. Other wikis having articles, that means nothign except that she does indeed have "appeal" and that "international opinion" would want her on wiki. She's an AV star, to be expected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by L3X1 ( talk • contribs)
- Delete other wikis are not evidence of notability. A blp requires proper sourcing. Spartaz Humbug! 23:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete clearly not enough sources to justify an article. We have now gotten the Japanese Pornographic actresses category down to 68 articles. Now if we could only make a reasonable dent in the articificially inflated American pornographic actresses category we might be getting somewhere. Back in 2007 it was the wild west days of Wikipedia articles. I recently nominated an article that has existed since 2004 and never in all that time had even one source. Lots of junk created in 2007 still lingers on. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Although there were several keep !votes, none directly addressed the lack of in-depth sourcing. – Joe ( talk) 09:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maiko Yūki ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. It's unclear who called her "Japan's AV Girl of the Year", perhaps the film distribution company. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep The article seems to include information someone close would have, presumably not being written in an unbiased fashion. Since the article has survived thus far since it's creation back in 2007, it might be best to check back and possibly restore the article to a point where it had reliable sources (the current page seems to have some issues with it as well), or see if there are any current sources available now. - Handoto ( talk) 00:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The article needs some help (note the red notes in the Reference section) but it has some good information and companion articles written in six other languages in Wikipedia help to show this person's appeal. ₪Rickn Asia₪ 01:39, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 09:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of notability, hasn't won any notable or significant awards, fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 19:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep As pointed out above, there are six other language versions of this page. To me this shows international opinion that the article deserves a place on WP -- John B123 ( talk) 18:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. There is no claim of passing WP:PORNBIO, and references don't support passing WP:GNG. As for the keep arguments, a Wikipedia article's longevity is no indication of its subject's notability. The Porn Project has many 10-year-old articles that are getting cleaned out. Presence in other Wikipedia editions is a circular argument as they tend to copy from en.Wikipedia. The other articles also use the same or similar low quality references. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:37, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 08:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 08:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails NHOTTIE GNG etc. Other wikis having articles, that means nothign except that she does indeed have "appeal" and that "international opinion" would want her on wiki. She's an AV star, to be expected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by L3X1 ( talk • contribs)
- Delete other wikis are not evidence of notability. A blp requires proper sourcing. Spartaz Humbug! 23:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete clearly not enough sources to justify an article. We have now gotten the Japanese Pornographic actresses category down to 68 articles. Now if we could only make a reasonable dent in the articificially inflated American pornographic actresses category we might be getting somewhere. Back in 2007 it was the wild west days of Wikipedia articles. I recently nominated an article that has existed since 2004 and never in all that time had even one source. Lots of junk created in 2007 still lingers on. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.