- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Magpie Recycling ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable subject. No citations. Devokewater ( talk) 15:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 15:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 15:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 15:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - I searched for sources both under the name given in the article, as well as with various variations of "cooperative" or "co-op", and turned up very little. It has a couple of mentions in a few books and papers, but none of them did anything more than establish that it existed, and gave no actual discussion regarding the group. It also appears that the group may no longer be in operation, making it unlikely that any further sources regarding it will be created in the future. There is just not any WP:SIGCOV on this group, causing it to fail the WP:GNG, as well as the more specific guidelines like WP:NORG. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:32, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination and per Rorshacma's well-researched rationale. ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 18:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No significant coverage. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 19:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Magpie Recycling ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable subject. No citations. Devokewater ( talk) 15:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 15:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 15:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 15:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - I searched for sources both under the name given in the article, as well as with various variations of "cooperative" or "co-op", and turned up very little. It has a couple of mentions in a few books and papers, but none of them did anything more than establish that it existed, and gave no actual discussion regarding the group. It also appears that the group may no longer be in operation, making it unlikely that any further sources regarding it will be created in the future. There is just not any WP:SIGCOV on this group, causing it to fail the WP:GNG, as well as the more specific guidelines like WP:NORG. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:32, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination and per Rorshacma's well-researched rationale. ~dom Kaos~ ( talk) 18:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No significant coverage. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 19:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.