The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable fictional character. Most of the references to Maglor are in passing, although he does appear to be a character in a Tolkien-based drama titled The Masque of the Silmarils, however this non-notable drama cannot provide notability for Maglor. Fails
WP:GNG.
Hog Farm (
talk)
23:21, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete The last discussion features appeals to name dropping in wide ranging articles on the Silmarils themselves. This does not constitute the indepth analasis of a subject we need to justify an article, especially an article on a fictional character.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment The Simarillion characters category is bigger than the Lord of the Rings characters category, although both have several redirects so the number of articles is harder to compare. It should clearly be the other way around since the Lord of the Rings has many more characters that meet resonable inclusion standards.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable fictional character. Most of the references to Maglor are in passing, although he does appear to be a character in a Tolkien-based drama titled The Masque of the Silmarils, however this non-notable drama cannot provide notability for Maglor. Fails
WP:GNG.
Hog Farm (
talk)
23:21, 26 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete The last discussion features appeals to name dropping in wide ranging articles on the Silmarils themselves. This does not constitute the indepth analasis of a subject we need to justify an article, especially an article on a fictional character.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment The Simarillion characters category is bigger than the Lord of the Rings characters category, although both have several redirects so the number of articles is harder to compare. It should clearly be the other way around since the Lord of the Rings has many more characters that meet resonable inclusion standards.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
13:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.