The result was Keep, clearly meets the notability guidelines. Since the AfD started more sources have been added, though BLP concerns mean any controversial content will need to be extremely well sourced. (non-admin close) RMHED ( talk) 18:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC) reply
An article on a living person has sat since February 2006 without any reliable third party sources. Given her highly controversial opinions, that are argueabley pseudoscience, it's essential an article like this have substantial third party sourcing. Otherwise, it can only alternate between a hatchet job or a promo piece. -- Rob ( talk) 05:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, clearly meets the notability guidelines. Since the AfD started more sources have been added, though BLP concerns mean any controversial content will need to be extremely well sourced. (non-admin close) RMHED ( talk) 18:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC) reply
An article on a living person has sat since February 2006 without any reliable third party sources. Given her highly controversial opinions, that are argueabley pseudoscience, it's essential an article like this have substantial third party sourcing. Otherwise, it can only alternate between a hatchet job or a promo piece. -- Rob ( talk) 05:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply