The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. This has been going on for long enough now, with only the article's subject arguing for a "keep". I am closing this one day early as
snow delete.
Randykitty (
talk) 18:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Does not meet
WP:GNG. The references seem to be about the subject's alleged product, not him. For that matter, the article is mostly about his product, not him. If one removes all the promotional information, what is left is very sparse indeed, and not backed up by citations. Also, violates
WP:COI and
Wikipedia:Autobiography.
ubiquity (
talk) 15:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Autobio and not sure how much of this is even accurate. (Almost sounds a little boastful too!)
Wgolf (
talk) 15:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete This is a pointless bio about a non-notable person. No good ref's. To the person sockpuppetting: if you have read articles about him, please citate them properly and add them. The only info in this bio is a product he made.
Jcmcc450 (
talk) 15:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Collapsing IP comments from the same individual. Mike V •
Talk 04:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep: This is well known person in Sri Lanka. I read so many articles about him from Sri Lanka National News papers... "Vijaya Pariganaka" , "Daily Mirror" , "Silumina" , "Lankadeepa" , "Dinamina" , etc... — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
112.135.191.213 (
talk) 03:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC) —
112.135.191.213 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Comment the preceding three comments are single edit editors, most likely
Sock Puppets of the articles creator, solely established to give the impression of more support for a position than actually exists.
Dan arndt (
talk) 15:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Contents of this article about Mr. Madura Kulatunga are almost accurate. But article must be rewritten according to Wikipedia guidelines. I suggest this can be done by experienced Wikipedia editor from Sri Lanka. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
112.135.82.11 (
talk) 17:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment When !voting, please make sure that your arguments are based in policy. If you want to assert notability for this person, then claims (like being known by 80% of computer users in Sri Lanka) need to be
verifiable by references in
reliable sources. Just saying something like "this person is very notable" will make it very likely that your !vote will be ignored by the closing admin. Thanks. --
Randykitty (
talk) 19:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable and dependent on poor quality references
GoneWilde (
talk) 04:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment I made changes to article and improved it according to Wikipedia policies. I really appreciate your suggestions. Give me more time to make this article better. Thank you.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 17:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
I read the revised article. Except for one biographical paragraph, it is still mostly about the product, and so are the references. The references include directory listings. I still believe this subject does not come anywhere near meeting the
general notability guidelines.
ubiquity (
talk) 23:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
I concur with
User:Ubiquity in that the references only establish the potential notability of the 'Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary' and do not establish notability for the creator.
Dan arndt (
talk) 06:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment I want to thanks
User:Dan arndt for identifying the potential notability of the 'Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary' by using established references. The references establish the potential notability of the 'Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary' also confirm Madura Kulatunga as the creator. By creating potentially notable 'Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary' Madura Kulatunga is notable for that creation.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 11:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Firstly before I comment, I have major concerns that there is a potential
COI with the editor,
Madura Kulatunga, who created and continues to substantially edit this article? Secondly I said the dictionary is 'potentially' notable. Thirdly notability is not necessarily inheritable. Finally I stand by my early comments this article fails to establish how
Madura Kulatunga is
notable.
Dan arndt (
talk) 12:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment News articles about Madura Kulatunga are published on national newspapers. Year 2003 -
Wijaya Pariganaka Magazine, Year 2004 -
Dailymirror, Year 2004 - Sunday
Lankadeepa, Year 2006 - Sunday
Lankadeepa (not repeat / new article), Year 2006 - Sunday
Silumina, Year 2007 -
Dinamina, Year 2011 -
Lankadeepa Sandella magazine, Sinhala newspaper article archives are currently not available on internet.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 12:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
CommentLankadeepa Sandella magazine is only publish articles about notable people in Sri Lanka. Most of them are actors and actresses.
Lankadeepa Sandella on 14-August-2011 (Page 11) they published article about Madura Kulatunga. Watch hard copy of this article on YouTube (56 seconds only / Change video quality to HD 1080p)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wObY45ySvUUThank youMadura Kulatunga (
talk) 15:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The Madura Kulatunga has made a widely recognized contribution Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary that is part of the enduring historical record in his specific field.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 18:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Dear
User:APerson Sinhala newspaper articles about Madura Kulatunga are not available online.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 16:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete; insufficient sources on him to establish notability. my attention was brought to this article by a posting at
WP:COIN.
Jytdog (
talk) 12:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Please refer to the
Wikipedia:Offline sources - Wikipedia's
reliable sources guideline states that articles should be sourced with reliable, third-party, published sources. Even though Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, there is no distinction between using online versus offline sources. In fact, many great sources are only available offline. Don't let that fact scare you away from using them as a
source in Wikipedia.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 15:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
are any of those sources in english?
Jytdog (
talk) 16:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
speedy and strong delete Should never have been allowed to exist for this long. Spectacularly fails
WP:BIO.
ukexpat (
talk) 16:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Madura Kulatunga is the Developer of Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary available in Online Edition, Android App and Software Package.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 18:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. This has been going on for long enough now, with only the article's subject arguing for a "keep". I am closing this one day early as
snow delete.
Randykitty (
talk) 18:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Does not meet
WP:GNG. The references seem to be about the subject's alleged product, not him. For that matter, the article is mostly about his product, not him. If one removes all the promotional information, what is left is very sparse indeed, and not backed up by citations. Also, violates
WP:COI and
Wikipedia:Autobiography.
ubiquity (
talk) 15:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Autobio and not sure how much of this is even accurate. (Almost sounds a little boastful too!)
Wgolf (
talk) 15:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete This is a pointless bio about a non-notable person. No good ref's. To the person sockpuppetting: if you have read articles about him, please citate them properly and add them. The only info in this bio is a product he made.
Jcmcc450 (
talk) 15:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Collapsing IP comments from the same individual. Mike V •
Talk 04:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep: This is well known person in Sri Lanka. I read so many articles about him from Sri Lanka National News papers... "Vijaya Pariganaka" , "Daily Mirror" , "Silumina" , "Lankadeepa" , "Dinamina" , etc... — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
112.135.191.213 (
talk) 03:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC) —
112.135.191.213 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Comment the preceding three comments are single edit editors, most likely
Sock Puppets of the articles creator, solely established to give the impression of more support for a position than actually exists.
Dan arndt (
talk) 15:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Contents of this article about Mr. Madura Kulatunga are almost accurate. But article must be rewritten according to Wikipedia guidelines. I suggest this can be done by experienced Wikipedia editor from Sri Lanka. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
112.135.82.11 (
talk) 17:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment When !voting, please make sure that your arguments are based in policy. If you want to assert notability for this person, then claims (like being known by 80% of computer users in Sri Lanka) need to be
verifiable by references in
reliable sources. Just saying something like "this person is very notable" will make it very likely that your !vote will be ignored by the closing admin. Thanks. --
Randykitty (
talk) 19:33, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable and dependent on poor quality references
GoneWilde (
talk) 04:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment I made changes to article and improved it according to Wikipedia policies. I really appreciate your suggestions. Give me more time to make this article better. Thank you.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 17:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
I read the revised article. Except for one biographical paragraph, it is still mostly about the product, and so are the references. The references include directory listings. I still believe this subject does not come anywhere near meeting the
general notability guidelines.
ubiquity (
talk) 23:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
I concur with
User:Ubiquity in that the references only establish the potential notability of the 'Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary' and do not establish notability for the creator.
Dan arndt (
talk) 06:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment I want to thanks
User:Dan arndt for identifying the potential notability of the 'Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary' by using established references. The references establish the potential notability of the 'Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary' also confirm Madura Kulatunga as the creator. By creating potentially notable 'Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary' Madura Kulatunga is notable for that creation.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 11:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Firstly before I comment, I have major concerns that there is a potential
COI with the editor,
Madura Kulatunga, who created and continues to substantially edit this article? Secondly I said the dictionary is 'potentially' notable. Thirdly notability is not necessarily inheritable. Finally I stand by my early comments this article fails to establish how
Madura Kulatunga is
notable.
Dan arndt (
talk) 12:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment News articles about Madura Kulatunga are published on national newspapers. Year 2003 -
Wijaya Pariganaka Magazine, Year 2004 -
Dailymirror, Year 2004 - Sunday
Lankadeepa, Year 2006 - Sunday
Lankadeepa (not repeat / new article), Year 2006 - Sunday
Silumina, Year 2007 -
Dinamina, Year 2011 -
Lankadeepa Sandella magazine, Sinhala newspaper article archives are currently not available on internet.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 12:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
CommentLankadeepa Sandella magazine is only publish articles about notable people in Sri Lanka. Most of them are actors and actresses.
Lankadeepa Sandella on 14-August-2011 (Page 11) they published article about Madura Kulatunga. Watch hard copy of this article on YouTube (56 seconds only / Change video quality to HD 1080p)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wObY45ySvUUThank youMadura Kulatunga (
talk) 15:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The Madura Kulatunga has made a widely recognized contribution Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary that is part of the enduring historical record in his specific field.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 18:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Dear
User:APerson Sinhala newspaper articles about Madura Kulatunga are not available online.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 16:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete; insufficient sources on him to establish notability. my attention was brought to this article by a posting at
WP:COIN.
Jytdog (
talk) 12:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Please refer to the
Wikipedia:Offline sources - Wikipedia's
reliable sources guideline states that articles should be sourced with reliable, third-party, published sources. Even though Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, there is no distinction between using online versus offline sources. In fact, many great sources are only available offline. Don't let that fact scare you away from using them as a
source in Wikipedia.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 15:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
are any of those sources in english?
Jytdog (
talk) 16:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
speedy and strong delete Should never have been allowed to exist for this long. Spectacularly fails
WP:BIO.
ukexpat (
talk) 16:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Madura Kulatunga is the Developer of Madura English-Sinhala Dictionary available in Online Edition, Android App and Software Package.
Madura Kulatunga (
talk) 18:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.