- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Closing a couple hours early per WP:SNOW. Hog Farm Talk 19:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Madradeco Village ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability concerns. Note that this "village" is not a barangay, the smallest administrative unit in the Philippines so it isn't inherently notable. It's within barangay Indangan. I also can't find any sources to its claim. What I did found were several water supply interruption articles where this location is mentioned.-- Lenticel ( talk) 00:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lenticel ( talk) 00:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:12, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GEOLAND per nom's analysis. – dlthewave ☎ 04:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete just an ordinary gated community with no evidence of notability. Notability here means covered by reliable and independent sources that do not promote the subject (here the community). JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 09:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom. —Ctrlwiki • talk • 11:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GEOLAND per nom. SBKSPP ( talk) 00:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GEOLAND. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 02:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The village is not notable. LSGH ( talk) ( contributions) 08:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Closing a couple hours early per WP:SNOW. Hog Farm Talk 19:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Madradeco Village ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability concerns. Note that this "village" is not a barangay, the smallest administrative unit in the Philippines so it isn't inherently notable. It's within barangay Indangan. I also can't find any sources to its claim. What I did found were several water supply interruption articles where this location is mentioned.-- Lenticel ( talk) 00:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lenticel ( talk) 00:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:12, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GEOLAND per nom's analysis. – dlthewave ☎ 04:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete just an ordinary gated community with no evidence of notability. Notability here means covered by reliable and independent sources that do not promote the subject (here the community). JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 09:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom. —Ctrlwiki • talk • 11:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GEOLAND per nom. SBKSPP ( talk) 00:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GEOLAND. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 02:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The village is not notable. LSGH ( talk) ( contributions) 08:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.