- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:21, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Machine translation in Brazil
- Machine translation in Brazil ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable original synthesis. fgnievinski ( talk) 04:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Any relevant content should be included into an appropriate section in Machine translation. -- Arbraxan ( talk) 10:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Abraxan's argument. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{ re}} | talk | contribs) 11:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - the article does not meet our notability guideline. Also note that the editor seems a WP:SPA. DeVerm ( talk) 06:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:21, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Machine translation in Brazil
- Machine translation in Brazil ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable original synthesis. fgnievinski ( talk) 04:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Any relevant content should be included into an appropriate section in Machine translation. -- Arbraxan ( talk) 10:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Abraxan's argument. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{ re}} | talk | contribs) 11:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - the article does not meet our notability guideline. Also note that the editor seems a WP:SPA. DeVerm ( talk) 06:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.