From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After improvement, the consensus was to keep. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 21:49, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Mabrur Rashid Bannah

Mabrur Rashid Bannah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability per WP:ARTIST, WP:BIO . Nominating for AfD as existing requests for improvement were not paid heed to since Jan 17. Devopam ( talk) 04:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 04:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The article is incomprehensible, so my first reaction was WP:TNT. There are many independent reliable sources available, however, so he is notable and Wikipedia should have an article about him. I'll take a stab at rewriting it tomorrow. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 07:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GSS ( talk| c| em) 08:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I blew it up and started over. It took more effort than I wanted to expend, but the result is, I think, understandable, accurately sourced, and of value to the encyclopedia. If nom's concerns have been addressed, please consider withdrawing the nomination. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 15:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After improvement, the consensus was to keep. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 21:49, 13 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Mabrur Rashid Bannah

Mabrur Rashid Bannah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability per WP:ARTIST, WP:BIO . Nominating for AfD as existing requests for improvement were not paid heed to since Jan 17. Devopam ( talk) 04:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 04:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The article is incomprehensible, so my first reaction was WP:TNT. There are many independent reliable sources available, however, so he is notable and Wikipedia should have an article about him. I'll take a stab at rewriting it tomorrow. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 07:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GSS ( talk| c| em) 08:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I blew it up and started over. It took more effort than I wanted to expend, but the result is, I think, understandable, accurately sourced, and of value to the encyclopedia. If nom's concerns have been addressed, please consider withdrawing the nomination. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 15:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook