The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails notability per
WP:ARTIST,
WP:BIO . Nominating for AfD as existing requests for improvement were not paid heed to since Jan 17.
Devopam (
talk) 04:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment The article is incomprehensible, so my first reaction was
WP:TNT. There are many independent reliable sources available, however, so he is notable and Wikipedia should have an article about him. I'll take a stab at rewriting it tomorrow. --
Worldbruce (
talk) 07:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
GSS (
talk|
c|
em) 08:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep I blew it up and started over. It took more effort than I wanted to expend, but the result is, I think, understandable, accurately sourced, and of value to the encyclopedia. If nom's concerns have been addressed, please consider withdrawing the nomination. --
Worldbruce (
talk) 15:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep I commend
Worldbruce for their work improving this article to demonstrate notability. Their work is a benefit to the encyclopedia.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 06:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep, seems to meet
WP:ARTIST. Lack of quality doesn't automatically warrant deletion. --nafSadhdidsay 18:38, 7 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails notability per
WP:ARTIST,
WP:BIO . Nominating for AfD as existing requests for improvement were not paid heed to since Jan 17.
Devopam (
talk) 04:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment The article is incomprehensible, so my first reaction was
WP:TNT. There are many independent reliable sources available, however, so he is notable and Wikipedia should have an article about him. I'll take a stab at rewriting it tomorrow. --
Worldbruce (
talk) 07:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
GSS (
talk|
c|
em) 08:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep I blew it up and started over. It took more effort than I wanted to expend, but the result is, I think, understandable, accurately sourced, and of value to the encyclopedia. If nom's concerns have been addressed, please consider withdrawing the nomination. --
Worldbruce (
talk) 15:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep I commend
Worldbruce for their work improving this article to demonstrate notability. Their work is a benefit to the encyclopedia.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 06:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep, seems to meet
WP:ARTIST. Lack of quality doesn't automatically warrant deletion. --nafSadhdidsay 18:38, 7 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.