The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 05:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete probable hoax. The only MX mentioned on Billboard has an entirely different discography and was never in the Hot 100.--
Sethacus 20:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete No sources, not notable, possible hoax. isaid 02:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete Unsourced - almost certain hoax .
Nigel Ish 16:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 05:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete probable hoax. The only MX mentioned on Billboard has an entirely different discography and was never in the Hot 100.--
Sethacus 20:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete No sources, not notable, possible hoax. isaid 02:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete Unsourced - almost certain hoax .
Nigel Ish 16:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.