- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 05:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- MSpy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does Not Cite Any Notable References, Most of the links i found in Google are Press Releases and PR initiatives of Mspy. Furthermore, this article is written more like an Brochure. If someone wants to fix this one out please do, in other case i am in strong favour of deleting this article. Foodie ( talk) 23:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Agree. No notable references. References quoted are non-notable. peterl ( talk) 01:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Spammy, seems to fail WP:NSOFT. After quick web search, unable to find significant coverage. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 01:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - software article lacking reliable sources to establish notability. Sources used are incidental mentions, company sites, and toptenreviews.com, which has been discussed on the Reliable sources noticeboard several times, where consensus was that it is not a reliable source. A search revealed a number of similar review sites of questionable reliability - the best was [1], but not enough RS coverage to establish notability. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 14:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 05:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- MSpy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does Not Cite Any Notable References, Most of the links i found in Google are Press Releases and PR initiatives of Mspy. Furthermore, this article is written more like an Brochure. If someone wants to fix this one out please do, in other case i am in strong favour of deleting this article. Foodie ( talk) 23:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Agree. No notable references. References quoted are non-notable. peterl ( talk) 01:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Spammy, seems to fail WP:NSOFT. After quick web search, unable to find significant coverage. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 01:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - software article lacking reliable sources to establish notability. Sources used are incidental mentions, company sites, and toptenreviews.com, which has been discussed on the Reliable sources noticeboard several times, where consensus was that it is not a reliable source. A search revealed a number of similar review sites of questionable reliability - the best was [1], but not enough RS coverage to establish notability. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 14:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.