- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MDK (series) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The "series" only got two entries, with a third cancelled. Much of the information on the page is duplicated from the articles about the individual games. The additional info about the 3rd game is also already in MDK2. The page doesn't pass the criteria for a series article and I don't think any info here is not already in the other pages. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 20:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 20:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree that this article is redundant. Nwhyte ( talk) 22:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom: Content seems to be a direct duplicate of both MDK and MDK 2. I don't think there is anything here that isn't already mentioned in that two articles. OceanHok ( talk) 13:43, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Appears to be duplicative with the other articles, unless someone can point out the difference. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 02:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - I always thought this article was superfluous despite working on it in the past. Bertaut ( talk) 14:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Fraudelent — Preceding unsigned comment added by TzarN64 ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CONTENTFORK. Mann Mann ( talk) 06:46, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Pretty much just a content fork. Pilaz ( talk) 11:13, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MDK (series) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The "series" only got two entries, with a third cancelled. Much of the information on the page is duplicated from the articles about the individual games. The additional info about the 3rd game is also already in MDK2. The page doesn't pass the criteria for a series article and I don't think any info here is not already in the other pages. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 20:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 20:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree that this article is redundant. Nwhyte ( talk) 22:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom: Content seems to be a direct duplicate of both MDK and MDK 2. I don't think there is anything here that isn't already mentioned in that two articles. OceanHok ( talk) 13:43, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Appears to be duplicative with the other articles, unless someone can point out the difference. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 02:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - I always thought this article was superfluous despite working on it in the past. Bertaut ( talk) 14:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Fraudelent — Preceding unsigned comment added by TzarN64 ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CONTENTFORK. Mann Mann ( talk) 06:46, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Pretty much just a content fork. Pilaz ( talk) 11:13, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.