The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete This is a subdivision of
Kapayapaan Village, Canlubang, however that doesn't have an article yet, so a redirect is not an option. Does not satisfy
WP:GEOLAND which states subdivisions "could be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources" but I'm not seeing such coverage. It's not surprising that a fifth of
this hasn't recieved such coverage.----
Pontificalibus06:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Practically all of the keep !votes here point to
WP:GEOLAND as the only justification for this article's subject's notability. As a sitio, which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, MCDC falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under
WP:GNG, which it fails to meet. —
seav (
talk)
13:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete This is a subdivision of
Kapayapaan Village, Canlubang, however that doesn't have an article yet, so a redirect is not an option. Does not satisfy
WP:GEOLAND which states subdivisions "could be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources" but I'm not seeing such coverage. It's not surprising that a fifth of
this hasn't recieved such coverage.----
Pontificalibus06:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Practically all of the keep !votes here point to
WP:GEOLAND as the only justification for this article's subject's notability. As a sitio, which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, MCDC falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under
WP:GNG, which it fails to meet. —
seav (
talk)
13:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.