- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. I did not realize inclusion in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography was notable. ( non-admin closure) Gestrid ( talk) 20:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
M. H. Holcroft
- M. H. Holcroft ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person does not seem to be particularly notable and does not meet the general notability guideline of significant coverage by reliable sources. Gestrid ( talk) 02:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- keep the article should explain more of his writing style and the novel. since he had won 2 awards suggest to keep advice the author to improve more Maximpoudje ( talk) 02:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note to closer: This user's account appears to only be two days old, according to their user contributions. -- Gestrid ( talk) 02:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. People with entries in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography are generally considered notable (with a very small number of exceptions who have articles there as representatives of society; this does not apply in this case).- gadfium 04:38, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Notes: As noted above, DNZB entries are usually considered notable. Although not directly pertinent to this discussion I note that the creator of this article
Pohick2 (
talk ·
contribs) was indef blocked for Copyvio. A few months later
7Lawrence (
talk ·
contribs) was created with the apparent express purpose of expanding this article and the creation of the recently deleted (see
WP:Articles for deletion/Christopher Holcroft) and then userfied
User:7Lawrence/Christopher Holcroft. A cynic might conclude that there is some COI going on here.
DerbyCountyinNZ (
Talk
Contribs)
04:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, a discussion at WP:COIN#Christopher Holcroft led me to the article which I then AfD-ed. -- Gestrid ( talk) 04:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, as there's a ton of precedent on DNZB bios. There is community acceptance that a DNZB entry infers notability, with about a dozen exceptions for representative entries (and this isn't one of them). Schwede 66 09:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. I did not realize inclusion in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography was notable. ( non-admin closure) Gestrid ( talk) 20:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
M. H. Holcroft
- M. H. Holcroft ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person does not seem to be particularly notable and does not meet the general notability guideline of significant coverage by reliable sources. Gestrid ( talk) 02:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- keep the article should explain more of his writing style and the novel. since he had won 2 awards suggest to keep advice the author to improve more Maximpoudje ( talk) 02:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note to closer: This user's account appears to only be two days old, according to their user contributions. -- Gestrid ( talk) 02:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. People with entries in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography are generally considered notable (with a very small number of exceptions who have articles there as representatives of society; this does not apply in this case).- gadfium 04:38, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Notes: As noted above, DNZB entries are usually considered notable. Although not directly pertinent to this discussion I note that the creator of this article
Pohick2 (
talk ·
contribs) was indef blocked for Copyvio. A few months later
7Lawrence (
talk ·
contribs) was created with the apparent express purpose of expanding this article and the creation of the recently deleted (see
WP:Articles for deletion/Christopher Holcroft) and then userfied
User:7Lawrence/Christopher Holcroft. A cynic might conclude that there is some COI going on here.
DerbyCountyinNZ (
Talk
Contribs)
04:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, a discussion at WP:COIN#Christopher Holcroft led me to the article which I then AfD-ed. -- Gestrid ( talk) 04:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, as there's a ton of precedent on DNZB bios. There is community acceptance that a DNZB entry infers notability, with about a dozen exceptions for representative entries (and this isn't one of them). Schwede 66 09:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.