- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 06:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Mühlacker Water Tower
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mühlacker Water Tower ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seemingly WP:NN ordinary water tower. The only sources I could find appear to be mirrors of this article except the Structrurae ref. Not enough to meet WP:GNG. Toddst1 ( talk) 05:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Germany. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 05:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for now. I've expanded it and added another reference plus created a literature section with a book source. Bermicourt ( talk) 08:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Seriously?
- The the source you added supports that some guy had a heart attack there and it was tough to evacuate him. That hardly makes the tower notable.
- Literature? It's mentioned in a book that seems to be a catalog of water towers in Baden-Württemberg. What does this book say about this tower that makes it pass WP:NOTABILITY? Toddst1 ( talk) 14:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. The mere fact that the tower is listed in a WP:RS suggests notability and that deleting the article now may be a little over hasty. Oh and BTW I've never seen a tag requesting a quotation from a book source before; if that was a criterion most of the Bibliography/Literature entries on Wikipedia would be deleted or tagged. Bermicourt ( talk) 16:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Seriously?
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
09:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete run of the mill water tower, nothing historical about it. No sources found, other than the person that had the accident and was rescued. Tower seems to be incidental to that story. Oaktree b ( talk) 16:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, does not appear to have received any actual coverage outside of passing mentions and database listings. Devonian Wombat ( talk) 23:13, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 06:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Mühlacker Water Tower
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mühlacker Water Tower ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seemingly WP:NN ordinary water tower. The only sources I could find appear to be mirrors of this article except the Structrurae ref. Not enough to meet WP:GNG. Toddst1 ( talk) 05:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Germany. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 05:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for now. I've expanded it and added another reference plus created a literature section with a book source. Bermicourt ( talk) 08:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Seriously?
- The the source you added supports that some guy had a heart attack there and it was tough to evacuate him. That hardly makes the tower notable.
- Literature? It's mentioned in a book that seems to be a catalog of water towers in Baden-Württemberg. What does this book say about this tower that makes it pass WP:NOTABILITY? Toddst1 ( talk) 14:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. The mere fact that the tower is listed in a WP:RS suggests notability and that deleting the article now may be a little over hasty. Oh and BTW I've never seen a tag requesting a quotation from a book source before; if that was a criterion most of the Bibliography/Literature entries on Wikipedia would be deleted or tagged. Bermicourt ( talk) 16:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Seriously?
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider)
09:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete run of the mill water tower, nothing historical about it. No sources found, other than the person that had the accident and was rescued. Tower seems to be incidental to that story. Oaktree b ( talk) 16:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, does not appear to have received any actual coverage outside of passing mentions and database listings. Devonian Wombat ( talk) 23:13, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.