The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY KEEP. —
JIP |
Talk 18:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete No one cares about this
LSEditor 04:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
AfD uncompleted by LSEditor. Speedy keep, bad faith nom. --
Apostrophe 16:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep. This is a featured article tagged for AfD by
User:LSEditor (currently blocked for vandalism) because it is linked to from the articles created list on my userpage, as revenge for an
AfD I posted. Incidentally, I think Jwestbrook was quite right to remove the AfD tag, in the spirit of
WP:IAR and
WP:Be bold.
Chick Bowen 16:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep, clearly meets criteria for notability, possibility of bad faith nom. |
Klaw¡digame! 17:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Keep Seems notable enough, as per above.
DeathThoreau 17:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep likely bad faith nomination. Clearly a worthwhile article.
CarbonCopy(talk) 17:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Keep notable, encyclopedic, well written article. --
אריאל יהודה 18:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY KEEP. —
JIP |
Talk 18:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete No one cares about this
LSEditor 04:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
AfD uncompleted by LSEditor. Speedy keep, bad faith nom. --
Apostrophe 16:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep. This is a featured article tagged for AfD by
User:LSEditor (currently blocked for vandalism) because it is linked to from the articles created list on my userpage, as revenge for an
AfD I posted. Incidentally, I think Jwestbrook was quite right to remove the AfD tag, in the spirit of
WP:IAR and
WP:Be bold.
Chick Bowen 16:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep, clearly meets criteria for notability, possibility of bad faith nom. |
Klaw¡digame! 17:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Keep Seems notable enough, as per above.
DeathThoreau 17:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep likely bad faith nomination. Clearly a worthwhile article.
CarbonCopy(talk) 17:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Keep notable, encyclopedic, well written article. --
אריאל יהודה 18:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.