The result was keep. henrik• talk 00:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Well, yeah, it seems there's not a lot of interest in this page. I created the stub almost four years ago (because several computer graphics articles had dead links pointing to it) and nobody bothered to fill it in with more info, so it didn't prove very useful. Perhaps it's better to just put it out of its misery.-- MCBastos ( talk) 21:18, 16 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. henrik• talk 00:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Well, yeah, it seems there's not a lot of interest in this page. I created the stub almost four years ago (because several computer graphics articles had dead links pointing to it) and nobody bothered to fill it in with more info, so it didn't prove very useful. Perhaps it's better to just put it out of its misery.-- MCBastos ( talk) 21:18, 16 February 2012 (UTC) reply