The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Topos show an isolated railroad point with no real development there. Meanwhile, Carlson evidently calls it a railroad station, and the newspapers.com hits don't appear relevant. Only Gbooks references are stuff like
this for a vague railroad point. I don't think
WP:GEOLAND or
WP:GNG are met here.
Hog FarmBacon04:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete or Redirect Similarly, I can't find any reliable secondary sources describing the this topic in any detail (results from the weather network don't count towards notability, naturally). The only thing that seems to be going on there is a lot of truck stop activity
[1].
Satelite imagery also shows that the site is simply a road, next to a reservoir/pond. At any rate, we can't use these sources for any kind of article salvaging since that would be
wp:OR.
BrxBrx(
talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})06:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Redirect to
Carson and Colorado Railway. As per my edits to
Talk:Lux, Nevada: "Lux is probably not notable. Carlson states that it was a non-agency station. Gamett and Paher do not list Lux as having a post office. Lux is not listed in
http://ghosttowns.com. Searching newspapers.com only finds mentions of Mr. Lux, for whom the station was named and railroad references." Lux, Nevada was a station, see
WP:STATION. For details about
Charles Lux, see
Henry Miller (rancher). As Lux, Nevada has no legal recognition and no non-trivial coverage, it meets neither #1 nor #2 of
WP:GEOLAND.
Cxbrx (
talk)
18:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Topos show an isolated railroad point with no real development there. Meanwhile, Carlson evidently calls it a railroad station, and the newspapers.com hits don't appear relevant. Only Gbooks references are stuff like
this for a vague railroad point. I don't think
WP:GEOLAND or
WP:GNG are met here.
Hog FarmBacon04:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete or Redirect Similarly, I can't find any reliable secondary sources describing the this topic in any detail (results from the weather network don't count towards notability, naturally). The only thing that seems to be going on there is a lot of truck stop activity
[1].
Satelite imagery also shows that the site is simply a road, next to a reservoir/pond. At any rate, we can't use these sources for any kind of article salvaging since that would be
wp:OR.
BrxBrx(
talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})06:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Redirect to
Carson and Colorado Railway. As per my edits to
Talk:Lux, Nevada: "Lux is probably not notable. Carlson states that it was a non-agency station. Gamett and Paher do not list Lux as having a post office. Lux is not listed in
http://ghosttowns.com. Searching newspapers.com only finds mentions of Mr. Lux, for whom the station was named and railroad references." Lux, Nevada was a station, see
WP:STATION. For details about
Charles Lux, see
Henry Miller (rancher). As Lux, Nevada has no legal recognition and no non-trivial coverage, it meets neither #1 nor #2 of
WP:GEOLAND.
Cxbrx (
talk)
18:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.