The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. v/r -
TP 00:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep it's been reviewed by a number of notable publications.
WesleyDodds (
talk) 05:09, 8 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep Satisfies
WP:NALBUMS: notable band, mainstream record label, two professional reviews, verifiable content. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯ 06:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. v/r -
TP 00:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep it's been reviewed by a number of notable publications.
WesleyDodds (
talk) 05:09, 8 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep Satisfies
WP:NALBUMS: notable band, mainstream record label, two professional reviews, verifiable content. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯ 06:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.