From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lucky Akter

Lucky Akter (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable politician who has never held an elected office. Coverage does meet the requirement for WP:GNG and easily fails WP:NPOL. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 21:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Bangladesh. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 21:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply
    Lucky Akter's Wikipedia page should not be removed for several reasons:
    Notability: Lucky Akter has gained significant attention and recognition for her role in the 2013 Shahbagh Movement, which was a pivotal event in Bangladesh's recent history. Her activism and leadership have had a substantial impact on the political and social landscape of the country.
    Public Interest: As a prominent activist, Lucky Akter's actions and contributions are of interest to the public. Documenting her life and work provides valuable information to those researching contemporary Bangladeshi politics and social movements.Historical
    Significance: The Shahbagh Movement is a critical chapter in Bangladesh's history. As a leading figure in this movement, Lucky Akter's contributions help contextualize and understand the broader implications and outcomes of the movement.
    Media Coverage: Her activities and statements have been covered by both national and international media, adding to her notability and the verifiability of the information available about her.
    Representation: Having a Wikipedia page for Lucky Akter ensures representation of female activists and leaders from South Asia, contributing to a more diverse and inclusive record of historical and contemporary figures.
    These points align with Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and verifiability, making a strong case for the retention of her page. Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 07:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
    https://journals.openedition.org/vibrant/2784 Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 08:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Please check this URL for her mention in journals: https://journals.openedition.org/vibrant/2784 Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 08:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
The Communist Party of Bangladesh is a registered party in the Election Commission of Bangladesh and Lucky Akter is a central committee member of that party. Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 08:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
  • comment There appears to be an undeclared conflict of interest here. Benzir A. Shawon describes themselves as a leader of the BSU, which Lucky Akter is (or was) president of. Before I removed it, the article was full of unsourced detail like her date and place of birth, educational history, height, marriage, child, when she joined organizations, and what she experienced there. If that information didn't come from reliable secondary sources, where did it come from?
A couple of good sources are cited ( [1] and [2]), but many of the others are written by her or are press releases. It's okay to cite such sources occasionally for details you can't find in better sources, but they don't contribute to notability and there's no reason to cite multiple versions of one announcement. It's also essential that the sources support the content where they're cited, which many don't do at present. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 16:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Sources updated. Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 19:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
  • comment and delete – I agree with the comment about the conflict of interest. Look at the information accompanying the photograph. The photographer, who took the picture three years ago, just happens to be the article creator, too. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Ira Leviton ( talk)
  • Delete Unelected candidates for office are not automatically considered notable, and she doesn't seem to meet GNG. Also, "representation of female activists and leaders from South Asia" is not a valid reason to maintain a page on Wikipedia. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 06:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lucky Akter

Lucky Akter (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable politician who has never held an elected office. Coverage does meet the requirement for WP:GNG and easily fails WP:NPOL. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 21:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Bangladesh. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 21:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply
    Lucky Akter's Wikipedia page should not be removed for several reasons:
    Notability: Lucky Akter has gained significant attention and recognition for her role in the 2013 Shahbagh Movement, which was a pivotal event in Bangladesh's recent history. Her activism and leadership have had a substantial impact on the political and social landscape of the country.
    Public Interest: As a prominent activist, Lucky Akter's actions and contributions are of interest to the public. Documenting her life and work provides valuable information to those researching contemporary Bangladeshi politics and social movements.Historical
    Significance: The Shahbagh Movement is a critical chapter in Bangladesh's history. As a leading figure in this movement, Lucky Akter's contributions help contextualize and understand the broader implications and outcomes of the movement.
    Media Coverage: Her activities and statements have been covered by both national and international media, adding to her notability and the verifiability of the information available about her.
    Representation: Having a Wikipedia page for Lucky Akter ensures representation of female activists and leaders from South Asia, contributing to a more diverse and inclusive record of historical and contemporary figures.
    These points align with Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and verifiability, making a strong case for the retention of her page. Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 07:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
    https://journals.openedition.org/vibrant/2784 Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 08:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Please check this URL for her mention in journals: https://journals.openedition.org/vibrant/2784 Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 08:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
The Communist Party of Bangladesh is a registered party in the Election Commission of Bangladesh and Lucky Akter is a central committee member of that party. Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 08:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
  • comment There appears to be an undeclared conflict of interest here. Benzir A. Shawon describes themselves as a leader of the BSU, which Lucky Akter is (or was) president of. Before I removed it, the article was full of unsourced detail like her date and place of birth, educational history, height, marriage, child, when she joined organizations, and what she experienced there. If that information didn't come from reliable secondary sources, where did it come from?
A couple of good sources are cited ( [1] and [2]), but many of the others are written by her or are press releases. It's okay to cite such sources occasionally for details you can't find in better sources, but they don't contribute to notability and there's no reason to cite multiple versions of one announcement. It's also essential that the sources support the content where they're cited, which many don't do at present. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 16:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Sources updated. Benzir A. Shawon ( talk) 19:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply
  • comment and delete – I agree with the comment about the conflict of interest. Look at the information accompanying the photograph. The photographer, who took the picture three years ago, just happens to be the article creator, too. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Ira Leviton ( talk)
  • Delete Unelected candidates for office are not automatically considered notable, and she doesn't seem to meet GNG. Also, "representation of female activists and leaders from South Asia" is not a valid reason to maintain a page on Wikipedia. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 06:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook