The result was delete. Nothing presented here convinces me that this subject passes WP:GNG or the standards of WP:GEOLAND. Simply existing doesn't merit inclusion. If folks find reliable secondary sources about this place and chose to prepare a new article showcasing that, so be it.
Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain ( talk) 00:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Geostub made by Spokane Ball yt who was blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. This one fails WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Please don't just add a GEONAMES entry as a ref; community consensus has consistently been against using such databases to establish legal recognition or GNG. – dlthewave ☎ 18:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwaiiplayer (
talk)
13:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nothing presented here convinces me that this subject passes WP:GNG or the standards of WP:GEOLAND. Simply existing doesn't merit inclusion. If folks find reliable secondary sources about this place and chose to prepare a new article showcasing that, so be it.
Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain ( talk) 00:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Geostub made by Spokane Ball yt who was blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. This one fails WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Please don't just add a GEONAMES entry as a ref; community consensus has consistently been against using such databases to establish legal recognition or GNG. – dlthewave ☎ 18:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
23:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwaiiplayer (
talk)
13:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)