From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC(talk) 06:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Love Place, Arkansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Only thing of note is that it has an 'unusual name' by one source, and the area has not received significant coverage by sources that are independent of the subject Bibliopole5795 ( talk) 03:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC) reply

  • This looks like a delete. The unusual place names mention is only an appearance in a list that appears to include hundreds of items. The topographic maps consistently label this place in smaller or italic fonts reserved for non-community features, and searches in the places I normally look for notability of geographic places brings up nothing significant. This looks like this was probably somebody's "place" - e.g. a farm/plantation/homestead. I'm finding no indication that WP:GEOLAND is met here. Hog Farm Talk 04:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC(talk) 06:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Love Place, Arkansas (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Only thing of note is that it has an 'unusual name' by one source, and the area has not received significant coverage by sources that are independent of the subject Bibliopole5795 ( talk) 03:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC) reply

  • This looks like a delete. The unusual place names mention is only an appearance in a list that appears to include hundreds of items. The topographic maps consistently label this place in smaller or italic fonts reserved for non-community features, and searches in the places I normally look for notability of geographic places brings up nothing significant. This looks like this was probably somebody's "place" - e.g. a farm/plantation/homestead. I'm finding no indication that WP:GEOLAND is met here. Hog Farm Talk 04:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook