From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith! Missvain ( talk) 16:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Love Football (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating this for its lack of notability. Cannot find any sources online and it being Japanese exclusive it may not have any English sources to it. GamerPro64 17:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GamerPro64 17:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. GamerPro64 17:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete This article is one of the reasons I think A7 should matter for products too. I was simply unable to find multiple in-depth coverage in reliable sources (nor there is a JP Wiki counterpart to look for more), and this a clear failure of WP:GNG. There are pre-release brief articles like [1] and one Japanese indepth review [2], but nothing that would signal GNG being met/need for a standalone article. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 23:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 21:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC) reply
One indepth source is not enough to meet WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 00:06, 24 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 01:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith! Missvain ( talk) 16:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Love Football (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating this for its lack of notability. Cannot find any sources online and it being Japanese exclusive it may not have any English sources to it. GamerPro64 17:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GamerPro64 17:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. GamerPro64 17:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete This article is one of the reasons I think A7 should matter for products too. I was simply unable to find multiple in-depth coverage in reliable sources (nor there is a JP Wiki counterpart to look for more), and this a clear failure of WP:GNG. There are pre-release brief articles like [1] and one Japanese indepth review [2], but nothing that would signal GNG being met/need for a standalone article. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 23:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 21:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC) reply
One indepth source is not enough to meet WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 00:06, 24 January 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 01:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook