- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 00:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Loudoun Valley Estates, Virginia
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Loudoun Valley Estates, Virginia ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although it's a CDP, I found zero independent coverage for this large housing development aside from real estate listings and various sites that source location data from various government databases. The only source is a census table, which would fail
WP:NGEO: "This guideline specifically excludes maps and various tables from consideration when establishing topic notability]]"
. –
dlthewave
☎
22:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. – dlthewave ☎ 22:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. – dlthewave ☎ 22:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I still hold that CDPs meet the requirement of GEOLAND as being federally recognized places. Not sure you looked for coverage that hard, because this isn't independent but useful. Though This, this, this, this, this, this, and this qualify as independent and useful. I could go on. We don't need to delete everything with "Estates" or "Corner" in the title. ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 01:19, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:13, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It's a housing development sure, but there's a distinction we need to make between a generic housing development and a housing development large/notable enough that it "becomes" a place. That's what happened here. There's a "Loudoun Valley Estates III" mentioned in one of those articles, that would be an absolute delete if it had an article on it, but it seems clear this is referred to as a place now. SportingFlyer T· C 21:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Notable as a legally recognized, populated place. See WP:GEOLAND. Smartyllama ( talk) 14:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 00:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Loudoun Valley Estates, Virginia
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Loudoun Valley Estates, Virginia ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although it's a CDP, I found zero independent coverage for this large housing development aside from real estate listings and various sites that source location data from various government databases. The only source is a census table, which would fail
WP:NGEO: "This guideline specifically excludes maps and various tables from consideration when establishing topic notability]]"
. –
dlthewave
☎
22:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. – dlthewave ☎ 22:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. – dlthewave ☎ 22:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I still hold that CDPs meet the requirement of GEOLAND as being federally recognized places. Not sure you looked for coverage that hard, because this isn't independent but useful. Though This, this, this, this, this, this, and this qualify as independent and useful. I could go on. We don't need to delete everything with "Estates" or "Corner" in the title. ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 01:19, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:13, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It's a housing development sure, but there's a distinction we need to make between a generic housing development and a housing development large/notable enough that it "becomes" a place. That's what happened here. There's a "Loudoun Valley Estates III" mentioned in one of those articles, that would be an absolute delete if it had an article on it, but it seems clear this is referred to as a place now. SportingFlyer T· C 21:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Notable as a legally recognized, populated place. See WP:GEOLAND. Smartyllama ( talk) 14:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.