The result was merge to Lizardmen (Warhammer). ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC) reply
I very carefully researched this character, with and without the "Lord". I discovered that it is not discussed in any scholarly analyses, not analysed in any independently published books, nor mentioned in any news items. The level of "internet appreciation" of this character is low; 319 Google Hits. I even compared the page view statistics of this article (less than 20 a day) to others in its game, who are in general much higher. (Those that were not I just tagged for notability.) A note on the talk page from March seems to be a pre-vote for deletion. All in all I felt reasonably confident that this would be an uncontroversial deletion. Deprodded. Abductive ( talk) 20:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Lizardmen (Warhammer). ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC) reply
I very carefully researched this character, with and without the "Lord". I discovered that it is not discussed in any scholarly analyses, not analysed in any independently published books, nor mentioned in any news items. The level of "internet appreciation" of this character is low; 319 Google Hits. I even compared the page view statistics of this article (less than 20 a day) to others in its game, who are in general much higher. (Those that were not I just tagged for notability.) A note on the talk page from March seems to be a pre-vote for deletion. All in all I felt reasonably confident that this would be an uncontroversial deletion. Deprodded. Abductive ( talk) 20:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC) reply