The result was speedy delete. WP:G5. Just Chilling ( talk) 22:48, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article created by Yahadzija sock in violation of global ban and thus unambiguously eligible for speedy deletion (CSD G5). An editor has contested speedy deletion because the article "seems to meet notability criteria (sic)". Even if true--and I would argue it does not--notability is not relevant to CSD G5; content created by banned users, notable and non-notable alike, is subject to deletion per Wikipedia:Banning policy and Wikipedia:Blocking policy. The underlying philosophical premise is WP:DENY, not notability, and more long-term damage is done allowing banned users (especially Yahadzija) to trickle in content (especially non-notable minor tributaries) in this manner. Note also that prevention of enforcement of a global ban is explicitly disallowed and sanctionable by the WMF. Эlcobbola talk 19:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:G5. Just Chilling ( talk) 22:48, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article created by Yahadzija sock in violation of global ban and thus unambiguously eligible for speedy deletion (CSD G5). An editor has contested speedy deletion because the article "seems to meet notability criteria (sic)". Even if true--and I would argue it does not--notability is not relevant to CSD G5; content created by banned users, notable and non-notable alike, is subject to deletion per Wikipedia:Banning policy and Wikipedia:Blocking policy. The underlying philosophical premise is WP:DENY, not notability, and more long-term damage is done allowing banned users (especially Yahadzija) to trickle in content (especially non-notable minor tributaries) in this manner. Note also that prevention of enforcement of a global ban is explicitly disallowed and sanctionable by the WMF. Эlcobbola talk 19:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)