The result was delete. - Mailer Dia b lo 08:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC) reply
![]() |
ATTENTION!
If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks). You can participate and give your opinion. Please
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! |
Another comment - the article has now been substantially cleaned up, and has had a whole bunch of productive editors contribute (though not to this vote... hmmmm....) I think the clear concensus here to delete is pretty self-evidently wrong, and would invite all voters to take another look at the article and the story now and I reckon you'll probably agree.... maybe! - cheers, Petesmiles 00:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply
*Merge with and Redirect to
Notable YouTube Users article. --
Satori Son
18:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Hopefully a summation may be useful.....
Does Lonelygirl15's coverage constitute 'multiple non-trivial'? - my opinion, Yes - others above, No.
Does Lonelygirl15's 'notability' meet the Guidelines therefore? - my opinion, Yes - others above, No.
Is YouTube a notable website - concensus over the wiki says Yes, my opinion, Yes - others above seem to be saying No.
Is Lonelygirl15 'famous' on YouTube - pretty obviously yes - we all agree on this one!
Is this article a fun, informative, appropriate article for wikipedia, or another annoying geeky disctraction from the serious task of collecting knowledge? - I guess that's up to you Mr. Closing Admin...... (ps - go on, keep it!) - thanks folks! -
Petesmiles
06:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Dia b lo 08:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC) reply
![]() |
ATTENTION!
If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks). You can participate and give your opinion. Please
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! |
Another comment - the article has now been substantially cleaned up, and has had a whole bunch of productive editors contribute (though not to this vote... hmmmm....) I think the clear concensus here to delete is pretty self-evidently wrong, and would invite all voters to take another look at the article and the story now and I reckon you'll probably agree.... maybe! - cheers, Petesmiles 00:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC) reply
*Merge with and Redirect to
Notable YouTube Users article. --
Satori Son
18:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Hopefully a summation may be useful.....
Does Lonelygirl15's coverage constitute 'multiple non-trivial'? - my opinion, Yes - others above, No.
Does Lonelygirl15's 'notability' meet the Guidelines therefore? - my opinion, Yes - others above, No.
Is YouTube a notable website - concensus over the wiki says Yes, my opinion, Yes - others above seem to be saying No.
Is Lonelygirl15 'famous' on YouTube - pretty obviously yes - we all agree on this one!
Is this article a fun, informative, appropriate article for wikipedia, or another annoying geeky disctraction from the serious task of collecting knowledge? - I guess that's up to you Mr. Closing Admin...... (ps - go on, keep it!) - thanks folks! -
Petesmiles
06:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
reply