The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 00:50, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable bus-route, with neither a claim to notability nor any evidence of notability per WP:GNG.
I PRODded it, but the PROD was contested on the grounds of a pre-existing discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London Transport. However, the assessments in that discussion seem pretty shoddy. For example, this comment praises London Buses route 187, but I see no evidence there of notability.
The editor who removed this PROD also contested a series of PRODs for West Midlands bus routes for which there was no evidence of notability. If WikiProjects don't follow accepted standards of notability, then editors really do not have valid grounds for complaint that community-wide forums are used to remove non-notable material. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 23:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply
( contribs)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 00:50, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable bus-route, with neither a claim to notability nor any evidence of notability per WP:GNG.
I PRODded it, but the PROD was contested on the grounds of a pre-existing discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London Transport. However, the assessments in that discussion seem pretty shoddy. For example, this comment praises London Buses route 187, but I see no evidence there of notability.
The editor who removed this PROD also contested a series of PRODs for West Midlands bus routes for which there was no evidence of notability. If WikiProjects don't follow accepted standards of notability, then editors really do not have valid grounds for complaint that community-wide forums are used to remove non-notable material. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 23:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply
( contribs)