The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a city councillor, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NPOL #2. As always, city councillors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to demonstrate a reason why they could be credibly considered to have far more nationalized significance than most other city councillors have -- but with 54 of the 83 footnotes here (65 per cent) being
primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the rest of them being
run of the mill local coverage of the type that every city councillor in every city can always show, that has not been demonstrated at all. This, further, has some advertorialized overtones, with parts of it sounding very much like this was written to actively promote his upcoming re-election campaign, which is not what Wikipedia articles about politicians are for.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from actually having to pass
WP:NPOL #2.
Bearcat (
talk) 23:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Significant work and multiple sources added since nomination, consensus this is a notable author. Valereee ( talk) 18:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC) Valereee ( talk) 18:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing
WP:AUTHOR. The only notability claim being made here is that her work exists, and the only source being cited is an author profile on the
self-published website of her own publisher (which is not a notability-assisting source, as it isn't independent) -- and while the French article is considerably longer, it doesn't even cite one source at all. And while there are other potential notability claims not being stated in the article if you search for her name in the articles
Prix Robert-Cliche,
Scott Moncrieff Prize and
CWA International Dagger, none of those awards are highly meganotable enough to constitute notability freebies in the absence of much better sourcing than just a single directly-affiliated source.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to clear
WP:GNG on considerably more than just one primary source profile for referencing.
Bearcat (
talk) 23:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA. Subject does not even appear to have a profile on the Fight Matrix database, and has not made the top 10 of Sherdog's rankings. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 22:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Saint Mark's Basilica, Heraklion. Daniel ( talk) 22:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. I could not any sources searching under its name or alternate name n"Museum of Plastic Arts". Note there are many other museums called "Museum of Visual Arts". The supplied reference is a dead link. LibStar ( talk) 22:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I thought this was just a fluffy COI-inflected biography but the subject was notable, but on second thoughts I'm not so sure: is there really any proper secondary sourcing here? The position the subject occupies is not in itself notable, but it is possible that she is; I really can't find any secondary sourcing, and nothing on the internet besides the usual professional (primary) links. Drmies ( talk) 22:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Despite the article saying "She was best known for her magazine covers", almost all the coverage is about her death. Even if we rename this article Death of Helena Belmonte it would not meet WP:EVENT as it doesn't meet WP:LASTING. LibStar ( talk) 22:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dell XPS#XPS 730X, XPS 730X H2C. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This page was initially redirected to
Dell XPS#XPS 730X, XPS 730X H2C by
Czar for (I quote) dearth of
substantial and in-depth, dedicated
reliable sources (needs at least several)
. I have had a second look at the article and the only sources in here are to
other Wikipedia articles, blog posts, a brochure,
self-published sources, and what appears to be
original research. The article also
reads like a manual, being excessively
technical in scope and seems more for a PC-building enthusiast than a
general audience. The creator of the article has insisted that a discussion be held before "
deleting", but I would argue that a redirect suffices, given the lack of proper sources and encyclopedic content. —
k6ka 🍁 (
Talk ·
Contributions) 21:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. The article was significantly improved and I now believe the subject is notable. ( non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet
WP:NSPORTS. Drafted to the NFL in the 12th round in 1991 but failed to ever make the roster. He was signed by an NFL Europe team, but never took the field for them either.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 20:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. BusterD ( talk) 21:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is about an event (boxing match) that never took place and was cancelled less than a month after being announced. The content was originally included at Jake Paul vs. Tommy Fury but it was forked by a user. I believe a trimmed version of this content should be at Jake Paul vs. Tommy Fury and not as its own stand-alone article. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. BusterD ( talk) 21:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I believe this is a simple hoax, or if not a hoax, fringe theory or original research. There was no Third Reich in 1925. There was no NSDAP cabinet in 1925. The central claim, that the former crown prince pledged allegiance to the Nazis, is unsourced. Even if true, it does not validate the claim that this was the Third Reich, or that there was an NDSAP cabinet in 1925. Mccapra ( talk) 20:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to have played a game (" Alice Janowski compiled a career batting average of with 0 home runs and 0 RBI in her 0-game career with the Fort Wayne Daisies.") and is listed on the AAGPBL website as "This player has not been located. We have no additional information." Searches on Google, Newspapers.com, and in The women of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League: a biographical dictionary brought up no coverage. Fails WP:GNG. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
According to the AAGPBL website ( [10]), Janowski/y signed a contract with the South Bend Blue Sox in 1951. However, no statistics are known and according to the AAGPBL "This player has not been located. We have no additional information." No coverage found in searches on Newspapers.com, Google, or in The women of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League: a biographical dictionary. Fails WP:GNG. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. BusterD ( talk) 21:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
No independent sources available, no article on Thai Wikipedia, almost all hits on Google are mirrors of Wikipedia. Not inherently notable by virtue of being a stupa. Kazamzam ( talk) 19:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This is still strongly promotional. Over half of the sources provided are by Watson, his publishers, or his blog Atlas & Boots. The "Climb Every Mountain" articles is probably sourced by Watson as well since it's the same article or same verbiage claimed under different "writers". It's a laundry list of name dropping publications contributed to, and not much secondary coverage by any independent sources. Consider WP:IBA AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 18:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Pinging 78.18.228.191, Mattdaviesfsic, Philoserf. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 18:39, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Strong Delete. If it looks like a duck, waddles like one, and quacks like one then it's likely a dog? No, you got it - a duck! There can be no tolerance for paid articles. It's totally unfair to others. No offense to the subject who is likely reading this, but who also may not be the person in question who created it. This is not personal and by all means, if what is said here is not accurate please provide your feedback and make the case please.
JRed176 (
talk) 19:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:SOCKSTRIKE
Linguist111 (
talk) 19:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 19:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tick (character). Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable company. Mooonswimmer 18:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as we have three different options and two different redirect/merge targets proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Brand that fails WP:NCORP. Czech Wikipedia also has no non-primary sources, and this article has no sources. No additional sources could be found through an internet search. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Linguist111 ( talk) 06:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Redirect to De Bezige Bij, who acquired them in 2010 before putting the publisher on hold in 2015. Mooonswimmer 15:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting once more to see support for a Merge vs. Keeping or Redirecting this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. BusterD ( talk) 21:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I did not find enough references to show notability Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 13:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 19:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG require multiple reliable sources showing detailed coverage. Out of the two references in the article, I am unable to access the first one as my PC says that it's a dangerous and possibly malicious website and the second reference is a trivial mention. I have searched in Burmese and English and found plenty on Soe Lwin Lwin but nothing really regarding the apparently non-notable footballer of this name. Best sources were NLD and Eleven, both of which only mentioned Soe Lwin Lwin once in the entire article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Not a notable topic for Wikipedia to mention, any topic on this list should be moved to the main page for the corresponding Egyptian God. Gabe114 ( talk) 18:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Reywas92 Talk 18:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Citations for this include draft registration cards, social security index, and a census record – that's a primary source WP:REFBOMB! The short obituary in the Tampa Tribune is the only independent coverage, but this does not get to passing WP:GNG. Reywas92 Talk 18:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per criterion G5. Materialscientist ( talk) 01:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Moved out of process by relatively new account after earlier being draftified. Notability not demonstrated and of 2 sources, one is to Facebook. 'Naive' search did not reveal SIGCOV. Eagleash ( talk) 18:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discarding one keep and one delete which have no policy basis, consensus exists to delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Borderline notability and few reliable sources el.ziade ( talkallam) 18:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep Little known museum, but a museum nonetheless. Many photographs are provided. We wouldn't benefit in any way by deleting it. Thanks to User:Neuroforever for creating this interesting new article. पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete I have visited the citadel, this is a tiny exhibition and should not even qualify as a museum, let alone have its own article, or else wikipedia would be replete with insignificant "exhibition/museums". Rouay ( talk) 08:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Fatman the Human Flying Saucer. Daniel ( talk) 19:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Redirect to Fatman the Human Flying Saucer. Mooonswimmer 14:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 17:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 19:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Mooonswimmer 14:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 17:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable comic book imprint. Mooonswimmer 14:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 17:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Walsworth Publishing Company. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company Mooonswimmer 14:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lord Roem ~ (
talk) 16:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 17:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Lacking WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources; mostly just mentions or coverage from obscure sites. There is an interview at LA Weekly, but that's about it that would qualify. Prod was disputed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus exists to not retain the article. Normally where there is a split on merge or delete I ATD and go merge, but in this case I'm persuaded by Austronesier's comment as to why we shouldn't merge. Daniel ( talk) 20:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
While the first source mentions the traces of old civilizations found at Gunung Karang, I can find no evidence of any source (certainly not reliable ones) discussing an actual Gunung Karang civilization. There also is no indication that the prehistoric Pahoman menhirs have any relation to a "Hindu-style royal heritage site". Fram ( talk) 09:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Fram: There are several journal sources that say that in the area of Mount Karang there was an ancient Sundanese civilization. Whereas you only read 1 article and easily say there is no civilization. In addition, menhirs and seven wells were found as civilization references. That proves a little that on Mount Karang there was an Ancient Sundanese civilization. Blackman Jr. ( talk) 10:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 16:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per CSD G7. ( non-admin closure) Duckmather ( talk) 17:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
When I was gonna add a topic for the reason of merging the article, KBC Void into the other 2 articles List of largest cosmic structures and List of voids, I thought so by clicking the word, discuss, which was highlighted in red only to realize that I was creating another page, which is my mistake. So I immediately requested this article to be deleted.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Has been draftified once recently so we're here. While it was deleted in 2022, factors have changed since that AfD. However, it does not appear he's notable. Star Mississippi 14:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.kooora.com/?player=125732 | Database site, not within WP:SPORTBASIC | ✘ No | ||
https://int.soccerway.com/players/khalil-ibrahim-alabsi/651749/ | Database site, not within WP:SPORTBASIC | ✘ No | ||
3 | No mention of him | ✘ No | ||
https://arriyadiyah.com/676957 | Routine coverage of a youth fixture, mentioned only twice | ✘ No | ||
https://akhbaar24.argaam.com/article/detail/481299 | Mentioned once | ✘ No | ||
https://int.soccerway.com/matches/2020/11/07/saudi-arabia/pro-league/al-nasr-riyadh/al-quadisiya-khobar/3400415/ | Database site, not within WP:SPORTBASIC | ✘ No | ||
https://elghad.news/41183/ | Squad list mention | ✘ No | ||
8 | Mentioned once | ✘ No | ||
https://akhbaar24.argaam.com/article/detail/609666 | Two-sentence transfer announcement followed by a Twitter video. No depth. | ✘ No | ||
https://www.saff.com.sa/news.php?id=1902 | Squad list mention | ✘ No | ||
11 | Not mentioned | ✘ No | ||
https://akhbaar24.argaam.com/article/detail/530043/ | Not mentioned | ✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable journalist/writer - does not pass WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. The majority of the sources in the article are links to his own pieces. Of what is remaining, there is an interview with him from a podcast (not independent coverage), a press release, and two profile pieces (one linked to booking him as a speaker, so not independent; the other a very short profile on the National Press Association). I can't turn up anything more than this myself. WJ94 ( talk) 13:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Delete: The subject is not notable for a Wikipedia article based on the sources provided.
JRed176 (
talk) 20:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Stifle (
talk) 14:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cultural anthropology. Feel free to alter where the redirect points, if anyone wishes to do so. Daniel ( talk) 20:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
See related transpersonal business studies. I am pretty sure that there were anthropologists who were interested in transpersonal ideas such as transpersonal psychology, but unlike that "subdiscipline", it does not appear that there was ever any coherent movement within anthropology to consistently apply the ideas of the Eslaen movement (transpersonal "studies") to anthropology more generally. All the references in this article are to works that generally look at how the ideas have influenced certain actors in anthropology, but none of them speak to the idea being a subfield or approach that is uniquely "transpersonal anthropology". As such, it is basically Wikipedia promoting a parochial view of the authors of the article -- essentially a promotion of original research. jps ( talk) 14:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Transpersonal. Daniel ( talk) 20:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, this is not a thing. Searching for sources on "transpersonal business studies" only points to WP:FRINGE claims around dubious academic institutions seeking to promote transpersonal psychology in one form or another. jps ( talk) 13:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discounting a myriad of contributions which have no basis in Wikipedia policy or guidelines, a consensus exists to delete. Beccaynr's contribution is the most persuasive. Daniel ( talk) 20:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Lack of significant mentions in the independent sourcing provided, google doesn't turn up much. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 03:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
should never be used for third-party claims about living persons, so it does not support notability. WP:METRO
has been compared to that of the Daily Mail and other British tabloidsand the source in the article is based on an interview, so is neither reliable nor independent support for notability. If we consider the Insider source to be focused on culture per WP:RS/P, it still is a collection of images supplied by the subject and her quotes, with what appears to be about five sentences of a biographical overview, some of which is later clarified in the source to be based on what she says. The 2012 NatGeo is a brief mention of her blog, "Check out this list to find out where to grab a bold bite in San Antonio" but seems puffed up in the article as "featured." The Sony website source appears to be an advertisement, and at the very least is a nonindependent source promoting its own product. The brief coverage in Lonely Planet source is based on her blog post and her images, without secondary commentary to help support notability. Online searches find low-quality spam sites and her social media sites, but no significant coverage in independent and reliable sources. Due to the promotional nature of the available coverage, WP:PROMO is another basis for deletion. Beccaynr ( talk) 18:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
* Weak keep: It's a stub at the moment and it could be stated as such with the hope that it is improved upon.
JRed176 (
talk) 21:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 23:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 13:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There's rough consensus here that, for better or worse, the sourcing is sufficient to establish notability. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I came across this article on the Discord when the creator asked for help nominating it for GA. I took a look, but quickly realized that not only is it not ready for GA, my read of the sourcing suggests that the subject does not meet the GNG. I hate to take an article by someone brand new to AfD, so I asked the people at to have a look in case I was being overly strict with my reading of the sources. It's been a few days and no one has disagreed with my read, so here we are. From Hill To Shore and Gaarmyvet commented at the MilHist post and may wish to comment here.
Source analysis follows:
In my own searches, I found
Overall, I just don't see that GNG is met. I could possibly support a merge to Siege of Bastogne since he's largely known for a single amusing incident that occurred during that, but I'm not sure if it would be considered WP:UNDUE importance. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the pageand WP:NEXIST notes that
Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. And, frankly, the fact that this individual is getting significant coverage in multiple languages across multiple continents indicates to me that there is no doubt that this person meets the relevant notability criteria. Some people above also appear to be attempting to implicitly argue this should be deleted for failing the historical SOLDIER essay (i.e.
he was an average soldier), but per WP:NSOLDIER the essay is deprecated and
its use in deletion discussions is actively discouraged by the project. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 12:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
"worthy of notice" or "note"—that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life.I find the origin of the "beer in a helmet" to be particularly interesting and unusual enough to warrant mention in an article. Since the subject appears (by multiple sources) to be the origin of the story, to me, he is "worthy of notice". -- Otr500 ( talk) 08:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that SIGCOV is not met. Daniel ( talk) 20:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Refs are passing mentions and profiles. No secondary coverage. scope_creep Talk 23:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
on Rani Malik’s lyrics for the 1994 hit “Main Khiladi Tu Anari”That is a passing mention.
the great flow that Rani Malik had developed for the original.That is the extent. That is a passing mention.
lyricist Rani Malik.Not significant.
Looking at the refs above.
rafted by the technical genius of music director Anu Malik.Passing mention. Primary
Rani Malik penned the songPassing mention.
Doing a WP:BEFORE, which was done before. There is lots and lots of passing mentions as evidenced by the analysis, but not even an interview using the Google CSE search. Nothing on a straighforward Google search - Wikipedia, not even an interview. On the news search, its the same kind of passing mentions coverage.
Currently Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. There is insufficient coverage to pass a WP:BLP. What is there is incidental. scope_creep Talk 12:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 12:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Certainly accomplished, but I cannot find enough in-depth sourcing to show that they pass WP:GNG. Was draftified in the hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any improvements. Onel5969 TT me 12:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 12:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This article has been outdated for years, since the wrestling tag team, Blake and Murphy got disbanded and the 2 wrestlers, Buddy Murphy and Wesley Blake, parted ways upon their release from WWE. I also requested some of the information from this page to be moved into the articles of Alexa Bliss and the 2 aforementioned wrestlers.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA. Subject's highest ranking by Fight Matrix is 274th in the world bantamweight rankings, which is short of the top 10 requirement. Subject has also never made the top 10 of a Sherdog ranking. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 10:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 12:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:BIO and WP:GNG , the references are unreliable and primary, selection and removal stories of PFF secretary would not make her notable. 17 refs, describing same story and interview, no other noteworthy importance in reliable sources . M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 10:48, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:35, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
A "list" of one for a very minor function (mayor of a small town of 3,000 people). Fram ( talk) 10:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. BusterD ( talk) 19:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOTCATALOG, a list of games that support an optional accessory for PlayStation VR. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
No significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 08:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Is this any different from a Preliminary hearing? If they are describing the same concept, then committal procedure should be deleted and redirected to preliminary hearing. On the other hand, if they are different concepts, then the articles should probably be merged and the differences elaborated upon. I am not a lawyer or otherwise an expert in comparative criminal law (though I find it fascinating); which is why I am starting a discussion rather than just going ahead and merging or redirecting. Rockstone Send me a message! 08:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This could be procedural close here because the nominator doesn't offer a strong rationale for why this article merits deletion and has more questions than proposals.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Borderline G11 candidate, citations appear to be largely self-published (i.e. from Forbes contributors) or overly reliant on PR materials. I'm unsure of the reliability of any of the websites that have apparently given the company awards, but my strong suspicion is that it fails WP:GNG regardless. always forever ( talk) 06:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Could not find independent coverage (like in mainstream press) of this event. There's mostly links from running related websites. LibStar ( talk) 05:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Has had no significant roles. I found zero hits on Google News. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 05:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
— hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 05:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable website with WP:BOMBARDMENT of sources that are mostly from the website itself. Partofthemachine ( talk) 04:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
酷安that's given in the article, but from what I can find there's nothing that would demonstrate notability. - Aoidh ( talk) 05:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:BIO. No significant coverage. LibStar ( talk) 04:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM as only BLOG style reviews found in a BEFORE.
PROD removed with "decline PROD, it got some notice. Add Today interview", but an interview with the actors does not make it notable.
Tagged for notability since January 2022 DonaldD23 talk to me 02:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "Inspired by real events, Caged No More is a thriller spotlighting what has been described as the “world’s fastest-growing crime.” The feature follows Aggie Prejean, a woman on a desperate search to find her two granddaughters, Skye and Elle, who have been kidnapped by their sinister father. ... The filmmakers raised financing for the project as well as resources for P&A with support from Icon Media Goup. The project shot in Baton Rouge, LA, in October and November 2014 before taking production to Athens in December and eventually New York City in February 2015. ... The film will open in 117 theaters this weekend, with showings concentrated where churches and other groups will mobilize their members to spread the word. Word Entertainment will handle foreign distribution and the title’s VOD and DVD release."
The article notes: "“Caged No More,” which shines a spotlight on human sexual trafficking, opened Jan. 22 in selected theaters, including Cinemark Perkins Rowe. ... Though it features characters with strong Christian beliefs, “Caged No More” has a less overt religious theme, telling the story of a young girl who is sold to traffickers to pay off drug debts. It is based on Molly Venzke’s novel, “Caged,” and Arnold and Venzke worked for 18 months to convert it into a screenplay. Along with Loreta Devine (“Grey’s Anatomy”) and Alan Powell (“The Song”), Sorbo also stars in “Caged No More,” which was filmed primarily in Baton Rouge and Athens, Greece. It includes appearances by Kathie Lee Gifford, Gretchen Carlson and former Gov. Bobby Jindal."
The article notes: "“Caged No More” opens Friday in theaters across the country. The movie, starring Kevin Sorbo, Loretta Devine and Cynthia Gibb, is the story of Aggie Prejean, a grandmother on a desperate search to find her two granddaughters, Skye and Elle, who have been kidnapped by their sinister father. He has taken them overseas to be sold into slavery to settle his drug debt. Aggie enlists the help of the girls’ uncle, a well-respected local philanthropist, and his son Wil, who is former Special Forces. They stop at nothing to see the girls safely returned home. ... “Caged No More” is the first movie in a trilogy. Molly is writing the next two books and screenplays. “The goal is to film the second and third parts in 2016, then release the films back-to-back in 2017 and 2018.”"
The article notes: "Filmed in Baton Rouge; New York City?/New Orleans?; and Athens, Greece, and released nationwide in theaters in January 2016, Caged No More is a drama starring Kevin Sorbo, Emmy-Award winner Loretta Devine, Alan Powell and Cassidy Gifford. Kathie Lee Gifford, Governor Bobby Jindal and Natalie Grant make cameos in the film, which centers on a godmother who discovers her two goddaughters were kidnapped by their father in order to be trafficked so he can settle a drug debt, and a global search for the girls ensues."
The article notes: "Inspired by real life events, "Caged No More" is meant to spread awareness about trafficking victims by telling the story of Aggie Prejean, a godmother on a desperate search to find sisters Skye and Elle, who were kidnapped by their father (Kevin Sorbo). As the details behind the girls' disappearance begins to unravel, it's discovered their father has taken them overseas to be sold into slavery to settle a drug debt. Prejean enlists the help of the girls' uncle (also played by Sorbo), a well-respected local philanthropist, and his son, Wil (Alan Powell), who's a former special forces soldier, to find and rescue the girls."
The article notes: ""Caged No More" is a drama meant to engage and educate audiences on the realities of human trafficking. The film releases January 22, 2016 nationwide. Inspired by real events."
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:Verifiability in secondary sources. He is mentioned in passing by a 5th-century Armenian author, but the only other source in the article that seems to mention him is Gibbon (18th century), who doesn't accept the authenticity of the individual as described. The best source revealed by BEFORE is this, which seems reliable but the relevant excerpt is just a translation or paraphrase of the original primary source. I also checked two other sources, this and this, both very detailed on the subject of 4th-century Roman-Armenian relations, and they have nothing to say about a Tiridates matching this one's description. If he existed, modern sources simply failed to take note of him. Avilich ( talk) 02:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable individual. Currently, there are seven sources in the article. One is a copy on an Instragram post; one is a podcast; and one is primary. This only leaves three references, two of which are the same article and all of which look like standard paid-for PR pieces. Searching online turns up very little, but that little just ended up being more of the same. I don't see any sign of notability either in the article or online. - Bilby ( talk) 02:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete this is spammy PR fluff. the only Tino Martinez I bring up that might be notable is a NY Times article about the head of the Housing Authority there. I hope they give Tino his money back, he paid them to write a deleted article. Oaktree b ( talk) 03:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
My name is Tino Hernandez*** not Martinez and I'm actually a real estate and consulting firm owner who happens to be in crypto since 2014. Not trying to boost my "image". I have a real brick and mortar business. I speak on stages around the world teaching people about real estate and sales. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.183.150.82 ( talk) 18:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTRACK. Also only based on primary sources. LibStar ( talk) 02:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Ex-holder of two Guinness World records, with no any other achievements whatsover. His article on ru.wikipedia has been deleted twice for lack of any national achievements [54]. Materialscientist ( talk) 01:48, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamvladd2000 ( talk • contribs) 04:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:BIO. UPE. Coverage is mainly interviews, or his commentary, which isn't significant or indepth. WP:BEFORE finds nothing of significance. Forbes coverage is either 404 or contributors. No secondary coverage scope_creep Talk 00:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Keep The sources appear to convey notability. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JRed176 (
talk •
contribs) 19:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Well, what a sorry list. Of 13 refs 4 are press-release. 3 are non-RS, 1 passing mention, 1 primary, 1 is interview, 1 routine job annoucement and 1 interview. There is not a single WP:SECONDARY on the subject. Certainly verifies he exists. A WP:BEFORE found the exact same. Completely fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep Talk 11:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
So not a single secondary source, as SPA coi editor has to come and shovel more junk in support this BLP. No significant coverage, even on the BEFORE has been found. Fails WP:SICOV, WP:BIO. What is there is x of y articles, business profiles, interview and PR. No secondary coverage. scope_creep Talk 09:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need more participation here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:14, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:NCORP according to my search; some local publications with no visible editorial policies have mentioned the organization, mostly in reference to the bicycle race mentioned in the article or interviews with the founder (e.g. https://www.dailycamera.com/2019/11/21/colorados-largest-all-women-bike-ride-moves-to-lyons/, https://issuu.com/hinsdalemagazine/docs/november2016/17) but it is hardly extensive and reliable coverage. Trikekus (:3) 01:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a city councillor, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NPOL #2. As always, city councillors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to demonstrate a reason why they could be credibly considered to have far more nationalized significance than most other city councillors have -- but with 54 of the 83 footnotes here (65 per cent) being
primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the rest of them being
run of the mill local coverage of the type that every city councillor in every city can always show, that has not been demonstrated at all. This, further, has some advertorialized overtones, with parts of it sounding very much like this was written to actively promote his upcoming re-election campaign, which is not what Wikipedia articles about politicians are for.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from actually having to pass
WP:NPOL #2.
Bearcat (
talk) 23:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Significant work and multiple sources added since nomination, consensus this is a notable author. Valereee ( talk) 18:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC) Valereee ( talk) 18:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing
WP:AUTHOR. The only notability claim being made here is that her work exists, and the only source being cited is an author profile on the
self-published website of her own publisher (which is not a notability-assisting source, as it isn't independent) -- and while the French article is considerably longer, it doesn't even cite one source at all. And while there are other potential notability claims not being stated in the article if you search for her name in the articles
Prix Robert-Cliche,
Scott Moncrieff Prize and
CWA International Dagger, none of those awards are highly meganotable enough to constitute notability freebies in the absence of much better sourcing than just a single directly-affiliated source.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to clear
WP:GNG on considerably more than just one primary source profile for referencing.
Bearcat (
talk) 23:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA. Subject does not even appear to have a profile on the Fight Matrix database, and has not made the top 10 of Sherdog's rankings. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 22:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Saint Mark's Basilica, Heraklion. Daniel ( talk) 22:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. I could not any sources searching under its name or alternate name n"Museum of Plastic Arts". Note there are many other museums called "Museum of Visual Arts". The supplied reference is a dead link. LibStar ( talk) 22:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I thought this was just a fluffy COI-inflected biography but the subject was notable, but on second thoughts I'm not so sure: is there really any proper secondary sourcing here? The position the subject occupies is not in itself notable, but it is possible that she is; I really can't find any secondary sourcing, and nothing on the internet besides the usual professional (primary) links. Drmies ( talk) 22:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Despite the article saying "She was best known for her magazine covers", almost all the coverage is about her death. Even if we rename this article Death of Helena Belmonte it would not meet WP:EVENT as it doesn't meet WP:LASTING. LibStar ( talk) 22:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dell XPS#XPS 730X, XPS 730X H2C. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This page was initially redirected to
Dell XPS#XPS 730X, XPS 730X H2C by
Czar for (I quote) dearth of
substantial and in-depth, dedicated
reliable sources (needs at least several)
. I have had a second look at the article and the only sources in here are to
other Wikipedia articles, blog posts, a brochure,
self-published sources, and what appears to be
original research. The article also
reads like a manual, being excessively
technical in scope and seems more for a PC-building enthusiast than a
general audience. The creator of the article has insisted that a discussion be held before "
deleting", but I would argue that a redirect suffices, given the lack of proper sources and encyclopedic content. —
k6ka 🍁 (
Talk ·
Contributions) 21:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. The article was significantly improved and I now believe the subject is notable. ( non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet
WP:NSPORTS. Drafted to the NFL in the 12th round in 1991 but failed to ever make the roster. He was signed by an NFL Europe team, but never took the field for them either.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 20:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. BusterD ( talk) 21:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is about an event (boxing match) that never took place and was cancelled less than a month after being announced. The content was originally included at Jake Paul vs. Tommy Fury but it was forked by a user. I believe a trimmed version of this content should be at Jake Paul vs. Tommy Fury and not as its own stand-alone article. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. BusterD ( talk) 21:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I believe this is a simple hoax, or if not a hoax, fringe theory or original research. There was no Third Reich in 1925. There was no NSDAP cabinet in 1925. The central claim, that the former crown prince pledged allegiance to the Nazis, is unsourced. Even if true, it does not validate the claim that this was the Third Reich, or that there was an NDSAP cabinet in 1925. Mccapra ( talk) 20:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to have played a game (" Alice Janowski compiled a career batting average of with 0 home runs and 0 RBI in her 0-game career with the Fort Wayne Daisies.") and is listed on the AAGPBL website as "This player has not been located. We have no additional information." Searches on Google, Newspapers.com, and in The women of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League: a biographical dictionary brought up no coverage. Fails WP:GNG. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
According to the AAGPBL website ( [10]), Janowski/y signed a contract with the South Bend Blue Sox in 1951. However, no statistics are known and according to the AAGPBL "This player has not been located. We have no additional information." No coverage found in searches on Newspapers.com, Google, or in The women of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League: a biographical dictionary. Fails WP:GNG. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. BusterD ( talk) 21:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
No independent sources available, no article on Thai Wikipedia, almost all hits on Google are mirrors of Wikipedia. Not inherently notable by virtue of being a stupa. Kazamzam ( talk) 19:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This is still strongly promotional. Over half of the sources provided are by Watson, his publishers, or his blog Atlas & Boots. The "Climb Every Mountain" articles is probably sourced by Watson as well since it's the same article or same verbiage claimed under different "writers". It's a laundry list of name dropping publications contributed to, and not much secondary coverage by any independent sources. Consider WP:IBA AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 18:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Pinging 78.18.228.191, Mattdaviesfsic, Philoserf. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 18:39, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Strong Delete. If it looks like a duck, waddles like one, and quacks like one then it's likely a dog? No, you got it - a duck! There can be no tolerance for paid articles. It's totally unfair to others. No offense to the subject who is likely reading this, but who also may not be the person in question who created it. This is not personal and by all means, if what is said here is not accurate please provide your feedback and make the case please.
JRed176 (
talk) 19:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:SOCKSTRIKE
Linguist111 (
talk) 19:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 19:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tick (character). Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable company. Mooonswimmer 18:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as we have three different options and two different redirect/merge targets proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Brand that fails WP:NCORP. Czech Wikipedia also has no non-primary sources, and this article has no sources. No additional sources could be found through an internet search. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Linguist111 ( talk) 06:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Redirect to De Bezige Bij, who acquired them in 2010 before putting the publisher on hold in 2015. Mooonswimmer 15:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting once more to see support for a Merge vs. Keeping or Redirecting this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. BusterD ( talk) 21:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I did not find enough references to show notability Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 13:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 19:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG require multiple reliable sources showing detailed coverage. Out of the two references in the article, I am unable to access the first one as my PC says that it's a dangerous and possibly malicious website and the second reference is a trivial mention. I have searched in Burmese and English and found plenty on Soe Lwin Lwin but nothing really regarding the apparently non-notable footballer of this name. Best sources were NLD and Eleven, both of which only mentioned Soe Lwin Lwin once in the entire article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Not a notable topic for Wikipedia to mention, any topic on this list should be moved to the main page for the corresponding Egyptian God. Gabe114 ( talk) 18:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Reywas92 Talk 18:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Citations for this include draft registration cards, social security index, and a census record – that's a primary source WP:REFBOMB! The short obituary in the Tampa Tribune is the only independent coverage, but this does not get to passing WP:GNG. Reywas92 Talk 18:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per criterion G5. Materialscientist ( talk) 01:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Moved out of process by relatively new account after earlier being draftified. Notability not demonstrated and of 2 sources, one is to Facebook. 'Naive' search did not reveal SIGCOV. Eagleash ( talk) 18:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discarding one keep and one delete which have no policy basis, consensus exists to delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Borderline notability and few reliable sources el.ziade ( talkallam) 18:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep Little known museum, but a museum nonetheless. Many photographs are provided. We wouldn't benefit in any way by deleting it. Thanks to User:Neuroforever for creating this interesting new article. पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete I have visited the citadel, this is a tiny exhibition and should not even qualify as a museum, let alone have its own article, or else wikipedia would be replete with insignificant "exhibition/museums". Rouay ( talk) 08:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Fatman the Human Flying Saucer. Daniel ( talk) 19:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Redirect to Fatman the Human Flying Saucer. Mooonswimmer 14:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 17:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 19:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Mooonswimmer 14:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 17:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable comic book imprint. Mooonswimmer 14:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 17:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Walsworth Publishing Company. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company Mooonswimmer 14:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lord Roem ~ (
talk) 16:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 17:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 19:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Lacking WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources; mostly just mentions or coverage from obscure sites. There is an interview at LA Weekly, but that's about it that would qualify. Prod was disputed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus exists to not retain the article. Normally where there is a split on merge or delete I ATD and go merge, but in this case I'm persuaded by Austronesier's comment as to why we shouldn't merge. Daniel ( talk) 20:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
While the first source mentions the traces of old civilizations found at Gunung Karang, I can find no evidence of any source (certainly not reliable ones) discussing an actual Gunung Karang civilization. There also is no indication that the prehistoric Pahoman menhirs have any relation to a "Hindu-style royal heritage site". Fram ( talk) 09:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Fram: There are several journal sources that say that in the area of Mount Karang there was an ancient Sundanese civilization. Whereas you only read 1 article and easily say there is no civilization. In addition, menhirs and seven wells were found as civilization references. That proves a little that on Mount Karang there was an Ancient Sundanese civilization. Blackman Jr. ( talk) 10:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 16:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per CSD G7. ( non-admin closure) Duckmather ( talk) 17:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
When I was gonna add a topic for the reason of merging the article, KBC Void into the other 2 articles List of largest cosmic structures and List of voids, I thought so by clicking the word, discuss, which was highlighted in red only to realize that I was creating another page, which is my mistake. So I immediately requested this article to be deleted.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Has been draftified once recently so we're here. While it was deleted in 2022, factors have changed since that AfD. However, it does not appear he's notable. Star Mississippi 14:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.kooora.com/?player=125732 | Database site, not within WP:SPORTBASIC | ✘ No | ||
https://int.soccerway.com/players/khalil-ibrahim-alabsi/651749/ | Database site, not within WP:SPORTBASIC | ✘ No | ||
3 | No mention of him | ✘ No | ||
https://arriyadiyah.com/676957 | Routine coverage of a youth fixture, mentioned only twice | ✘ No | ||
https://akhbaar24.argaam.com/article/detail/481299 | Mentioned once | ✘ No | ||
https://int.soccerway.com/matches/2020/11/07/saudi-arabia/pro-league/al-nasr-riyadh/al-quadisiya-khobar/3400415/ | Database site, not within WP:SPORTBASIC | ✘ No | ||
https://elghad.news/41183/ | Squad list mention | ✘ No | ||
8 | Mentioned once | ✘ No | ||
https://akhbaar24.argaam.com/article/detail/609666 | Two-sentence transfer announcement followed by a Twitter video. No depth. | ✘ No | ||
https://www.saff.com.sa/news.php?id=1902 | Squad list mention | ✘ No | ||
11 | Not mentioned | ✘ No | ||
https://akhbaar24.argaam.com/article/detail/530043/ | Not mentioned | ✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable journalist/writer - does not pass WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. The majority of the sources in the article are links to his own pieces. Of what is remaining, there is an interview with him from a podcast (not independent coverage), a press release, and two profile pieces (one linked to booking him as a speaker, so not independent; the other a very short profile on the National Press Association). I can't turn up anything more than this myself. WJ94 ( talk) 13:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Delete: The subject is not notable for a Wikipedia article based on the sources provided.
JRed176 (
talk) 20:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Stifle (
talk) 14:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cultural anthropology. Feel free to alter where the redirect points, if anyone wishes to do so. Daniel ( talk) 20:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
See related transpersonal business studies. I am pretty sure that there were anthropologists who were interested in transpersonal ideas such as transpersonal psychology, but unlike that "subdiscipline", it does not appear that there was ever any coherent movement within anthropology to consistently apply the ideas of the Eslaen movement (transpersonal "studies") to anthropology more generally. All the references in this article are to works that generally look at how the ideas have influenced certain actors in anthropology, but none of them speak to the idea being a subfield or approach that is uniquely "transpersonal anthropology". As such, it is basically Wikipedia promoting a parochial view of the authors of the article -- essentially a promotion of original research. jps ( talk) 14:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Transpersonal. Daniel ( talk) 20:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, this is not a thing. Searching for sources on "transpersonal business studies" only points to WP:FRINGE claims around dubious academic institutions seeking to promote transpersonal psychology in one form or another. jps ( talk) 13:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discounting a myriad of contributions which have no basis in Wikipedia policy or guidelines, a consensus exists to delete. Beccaynr's contribution is the most persuasive. Daniel ( talk) 20:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Lack of significant mentions in the independent sourcing provided, google doesn't turn up much. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 03:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
should never be used for third-party claims about living persons, so it does not support notability. WP:METRO
has been compared to that of the Daily Mail and other British tabloidsand the source in the article is based on an interview, so is neither reliable nor independent support for notability. If we consider the Insider source to be focused on culture per WP:RS/P, it still is a collection of images supplied by the subject and her quotes, with what appears to be about five sentences of a biographical overview, some of which is later clarified in the source to be based on what she says. The 2012 NatGeo is a brief mention of her blog, "Check out this list to find out where to grab a bold bite in San Antonio" but seems puffed up in the article as "featured." The Sony website source appears to be an advertisement, and at the very least is a nonindependent source promoting its own product. The brief coverage in Lonely Planet source is based on her blog post and her images, without secondary commentary to help support notability. Online searches find low-quality spam sites and her social media sites, but no significant coverage in independent and reliable sources. Due to the promotional nature of the available coverage, WP:PROMO is another basis for deletion. Beccaynr ( talk) 18:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
* Weak keep: It's a stub at the moment and it could be stated as such with the hope that it is improved upon.
JRed176 (
talk) 21:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 23:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 13:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There's rough consensus here that, for better or worse, the sourcing is sufficient to establish notability. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I came across this article on the Discord when the creator asked for help nominating it for GA. I took a look, but quickly realized that not only is it not ready for GA, my read of the sourcing suggests that the subject does not meet the GNG. I hate to take an article by someone brand new to AfD, so I asked the people at to have a look in case I was being overly strict with my reading of the sources. It's been a few days and no one has disagreed with my read, so here we are. From Hill To Shore and Gaarmyvet commented at the MilHist post and may wish to comment here.
Source analysis follows:
In my own searches, I found
Overall, I just don't see that GNG is met. I could possibly support a merge to Siege of Bastogne since he's largely known for a single amusing incident that occurred during that, but I'm not sure if it would be considered WP:UNDUE importance. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the pageand WP:NEXIST notes that
Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. And, frankly, the fact that this individual is getting significant coverage in multiple languages across multiple continents indicates to me that there is no doubt that this person meets the relevant notability criteria. Some people above also appear to be attempting to implicitly argue this should be deleted for failing the historical SOLDIER essay (i.e.
he was an average soldier), but per WP:NSOLDIER the essay is deprecated and
its use in deletion discussions is actively discouraged by the project. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 12:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
"worthy of notice" or "note"—that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life.I find the origin of the "beer in a helmet" to be particularly interesting and unusual enough to warrant mention in an article. Since the subject appears (by multiple sources) to be the origin of the story, to me, he is "worthy of notice". -- Otr500 ( talk) 08:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that SIGCOV is not met. Daniel ( talk) 20:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Refs are passing mentions and profiles. No secondary coverage. scope_creep Talk 23:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
on Rani Malik’s lyrics for the 1994 hit “Main Khiladi Tu Anari”That is a passing mention.
the great flow that Rani Malik had developed for the original.That is the extent. That is a passing mention.
lyricist Rani Malik.Not significant.
Looking at the refs above.
rafted by the technical genius of music director Anu Malik.Passing mention. Primary
Rani Malik penned the songPassing mention.
Doing a WP:BEFORE, which was done before. There is lots and lots of passing mentions as evidenced by the analysis, but not even an interview using the Google CSE search. Nothing on a straighforward Google search - Wikipedia, not even an interview. On the news search, its the same kind of passing mentions coverage.
Currently Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. There is insufficient coverage to pass a WP:BLP. What is there is incidental. scope_creep Talk 12:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Linguist111 (
talk) 12:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Certainly accomplished, but I cannot find enough in-depth sourcing to show that they pass WP:GNG. Was draftified in the hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace without any improvements. Onel5969 TT me 12:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 12:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This article has been outdated for years, since the wrestling tag team, Blake and Murphy got disbanded and the 2 wrestlers, Buddy Murphy and Wesley Blake, parted ways upon their release from WWE. I also requested some of the information from this page to be moved into the articles of Alexa Bliss and the 2 aforementioned wrestlers.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA. Subject's highest ranking by Fight Matrix is 274th in the world bantamweight rankings, which is short of the top 10 requirement. Subject has also never made the top 10 of a Sherdog ranking. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 10:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 12:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:BIO and WP:GNG , the references are unreliable and primary, selection and removal stories of PFF secretary would not make her notable. 17 refs, describing same story and interview, no other noteworthy importance in reliable sources . M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 10:48, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:35, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
A "list" of one for a very minor function (mayor of a small town of 3,000 people). Fram ( talk) 10:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. BusterD ( talk) 19:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOTCATALOG, a list of games that support an optional accessory for PlayStation VR. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
No significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 08:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Is this any different from a Preliminary hearing? If they are describing the same concept, then committal procedure should be deleted and redirected to preliminary hearing. On the other hand, if they are different concepts, then the articles should probably be merged and the differences elaborated upon. I am not a lawyer or otherwise an expert in comparative criminal law (though I find it fascinating); which is why I am starting a discussion rather than just going ahead and merging or redirecting. Rockstone Send me a message! 08:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This could be procedural close here because the nominator doesn't offer a strong rationale for why this article merits deletion and has more questions than proposals.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Borderline G11 candidate, citations appear to be largely self-published (i.e. from Forbes contributors) or overly reliant on PR materials. I'm unsure of the reliability of any of the websites that have apparently given the company awards, but my strong suspicion is that it fails WP:GNG regardless. always forever ( talk) 06:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Could not find independent coverage (like in mainstream press) of this event. There's mostly links from running related websites. LibStar ( talk) 05:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Has had no significant roles. I found zero hits on Google News. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 05:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
— hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 05:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable website with WP:BOMBARDMENT of sources that are mostly from the website itself. Partofthemachine ( talk) 04:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
酷安that's given in the article, but from what I can find there's nothing that would demonstrate notability. - Aoidh ( talk) 05:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:BIO. No significant coverage. LibStar ( talk) 04:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM as only BLOG style reviews found in a BEFORE.
PROD removed with "decline PROD, it got some notice. Add Today interview", but an interview with the actors does not make it notable.
Tagged for notability since January 2022 DonaldD23 talk to me 02:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "Inspired by real events, Caged No More is a thriller spotlighting what has been described as the “world’s fastest-growing crime.” The feature follows Aggie Prejean, a woman on a desperate search to find her two granddaughters, Skye and Elle, who have been kidnapped by their sinister father. ... The filmmakers raised financing for the project as well as resources for P&A with support from Icon Media Goup. The project shot in Baton Rouge, LA, in October and November 2014 before taking production to Athens in December and eventually New York City in February 2015. ... The film will open in 117 theaters this weekend, with showings concentrated where churches and other groups will mobilize their members to spread the word. Word Entertainment will handle foreign distribution and the title’s VOD and DVD release."
The article notes: "“Caged No More,” which shines a spotlight on human sexual trafficking, opened Jan. 22 in selected theaters, including Cinemark Perkins Rowe. ... Though it features characters with strong Christian beliefs, “Caged No More” has a less overt religious theme, telling the story of a young girl who is sold to traffickers to pay off drug debts. It is based on Molly Venzke’s novel, “Caged,” and Arnold and Venzke worked for 18 months to convert it into a screenplay. Along with Loreta Devine (“Grey’s Anatomy”) and Alan Powell (“The Song”), Sorbo also stars in “Caged No More,” which was filmed primarily in Baton Rouge and Athens, Greece. It includes appearances by Kathie Lee Gifford, Gretchen Carlson and former Gov. Bobby Jindal."
The article notes: "“Caged No More” opens Friday in theaters across the country. The movie, starring Kevin Sorbo, Loretta Devine and Cynthia Gibb, is the story of Aggie Prejean, a grandmother on a desperate search to find her two granddaughters, Skye and Elle, who have been kidnapped by their sinister father. He has taken them overseas to be sold into slavery to settle his drug debt. Aggie enlists the help of the girls’ uncle, a well-respected local philanthropist, and his son Wil, who is former Special Forces. They stop at nothing to see the girls safely returned home. ... “Caged No More” is the first movie in a trilogy. Molly is writing the next two books and screenplays. “The goal is to film the second and third parts in 2016, then release the films back-to-back in 2017 and 2018.”"
The article notes: "Filmed in Baton Rouge; New York City?/New Orleans?; and Athens, Greece, and released nationwide in theaters in January 2016, Caged No More is a drama starring Kevin Sorbo, Emmy-Award winner Loretta Devine, Alan Powell and Cassidy Gifford. Kathie Lee Gifford, Governor Bobby Jindal and Natalie Grant make cameos in the film, which centers on a godmother who discovers her two goddaughters were kidnapped by their father in order to be trafficked so he can settle a drug debt, and a global search for the girls ensues."
The article notes: "Inspired by real life events, "Caged No More" is meant to spread awareness about trafficking victims by telling the story of Aggie Prejean, a godmother on a desperate search to find sisters Skye and Elle, who were kidnapped by their father (Kevin Sorbo). As the details behind the girls' disappearance begins to unravel, it's discovered their father has taken them overseas to be sold into slavery to settle a drug debt. Prejean enlists the help of the girls' uncle (also played by Sorbo), a well-respected local philanthropist, and his son, Wil (Alan Powell), who's a former special forces soldier, to find and rescue the girls."
The article notes: ""Caged No More" is a drama meant to engage and educate audiences on the realities of human trafficking. The film releases January 22, 2016 nationwide. Inspired by real events."
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:Verifiability in secondary sources. He is mentioned in passing by a 5th-century Armenian author, but the only other source in the article that seems to mention him is Gibbon (18th century), who doesn't accept the authenticity of the individual as described. The best source revealed by BEFORE is this, which seems reliable but the relevant excerpt is just a translation or paraphrase of the original primary source. I also checked two other sources, this and this, both very detailed on the subject of 4th-century Roman-Armenian relations, and they have nothing to say about a Tiridates matching this one's description. If he existed, modern sources simply failed to take note of him. Avilich ( talk) 02:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable individual. Currently, there are seven sources in the article. One is a copy on an Instragram post; one is a podcast; and one is primary. This only leaves three references, two of which are the same article and all of which look like standard paid-for PR pieces. Searching online turns up very little, but that little just ended up being more of the same. I don't see any sign of notability either in the article or online. - Bilby ( talk) 02:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete this is spammy PR fluff. the only Tino Martinez I bring up that might be notable is a NY Times article about the head of the Housing Authority there. I hope they give Tino his money back, he paid them to write a deleted article. Oaktree b ( talk) 03:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
My name is Tino Hernandez*** not Martinez and I'm actually a real estate and consulting firm owner who happens to be in crypto since 2014. Not trying to boost my "image". I have a real brick and mortar business. I speak on stages around the world teaching people about real estate and sales. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.183.150.82 ( talk) 18:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTRACK. Also only based on primary sources. LibStar ( talk) 02:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Ex-holder of two Guinness World records, with no any other achievements whatsover. His article on ru.wikipedia has been deleted twice for lack of any national achievements [54]. Materialscientist ( talk) 01:48, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamvladd2000 ( talk • contribs) 04:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:BIO. UPE. Coverage is mainly interviews, or his commentary, which isn't significant or indepth. WP:BEFORE finds nothing of significance. Forbes coverage is either 404 or contributors. No secondary coverage scope_creep Talk 00:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Keep The sources appear to convey notability. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JRed176 (
talk •
contribs) 19:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Well, what a sorry list. Of 13 refs 4 are press-release. 3 are non-RS, 1 passing mention, 1 primary, 1 is interview, 1 routine job annoucement and 1 interview. There is not a single WP:SECONDARY on the subject. Certainly verifies he exists. A WP:BEFORE found the exact same. Completely fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep Talk 11:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
So not a single secondary source, as SPA coi editor has to come and shovel more junk in support this BLP. No significant coverage, even on the BEFORE has been found. Fails WP:SICOV, WP:BIO. What is there is x of y articles, business profiles, interview and PR. No secondary coverage. scope_creep Talk 09:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need more participation here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:14, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:NCORP according to my search; some local publications with no visible editorial policies have mentioned the organization, mostly in reference to the bicycle race mentioned in the article or interviews with the founder (e.g. https://www.dailycamera.com/2019/11/21/colorados-largest-all-women-bike-ride-moves-to-lyons/, https://issuu.com/hinsdalemagazine/docs/november2016/17) but it is hardly extensive and reliable coverage. Trikekus (:3) 01:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)