![]() |
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 15:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
This doesn't warrant it's own article and it's not encyclopedic Novalia ( talk) 23:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Oppose: Keep article, as these : Category:Acting families also have articles: Nominator appears biased and just wants to start shit by disrespecting.
-- Discographer ( talk) 01:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to ABBYY FineReader. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 15:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be a none notable software company. All the sources are to either press releases or the companies website. Nothing comes up in a Google search either. Except for trivial coverage that doesn't pass WP:NCORP. Adamant1 ( talk) 23:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I see no indication this player passes WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG. Govvy ( talk) 22:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Leaning towards keep. People disagree about the quality of the sources, but there's clearly no consensus that they're inadequate. Sandstein 21:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
"entity" that was merged into MasterCard. The article hasn't had any sources since 2014 and nothing comes up for it in a Google search except for Wikipedia spin off sites and brief mentions in personal blogs. Adamant1 ( talk) 22:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
UK based waste control company that doesn't seem to be notable. It's had a notability banner on it since 2010, the sources are all trivial or not reliable, and nothing about them that meets notability standards for companies comes up in a Google search. Adamant1 ( talk) 22:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMODEL, article in ru-wiki was deleted. Gruznov ( talk) 19:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:CRIN as has not played first-class/List A/t20 cricket and under-19 cricketers are not notable. StickyWicket ( talk) 21:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was draftify. Moved to Draft:Arienne Mandi. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actress, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NACTOR. As always, actors and actresses are not all automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- they need to have reliable source coverage about them to verify that they pass a notability criterion, such as having multiple (meaning more than one) major (meaning not just one-off guest shots on TV shows she wasn't a regular cast member of) roles and/or winning or getting nominated for a major acting award. But there are just three sources here (four footnotes, but one of them is a repetition of one of the others), of which two — her IMDb profile and her cast bio on the self-published production website of the show she's on — are not reliable or notability-supporting sources at all. And while the other one is a real (albeit paywalled) magazine article, it appears as far as I can tell to be a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself in the first person — which is a type of source we can use for supplementary verification of stray facts after the person has already gotten over GNG on better ones, but not a type of source that brings a GNG pass all by itself if it's the best sourcing on offer. And even if I'm wrong and it is a real article written in the third person, a person still has to have more than just one of those to pass our notability criteria.
As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she's got stronger sourcing, but just being verifiable as a working actor is not an automatic notability freebie that would exempt her from having to be referenced better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
An impressive amount of subscribers, but there isn't coverage in reliable sources to match. Does not meet WP:GNG, article creator appears to be a UPE creating articles about the channel's productions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The only notability claim being attempted here is that some of their music was included in the soundtrack to a video game -- but that still isn't an instant inclusion freebie in the absence of any reliable source coverage about the band, because we still have to be able to verify that the notability claim is true, and even our article about the video game doesn't claim that any of their music is in it. Furthermore, this has been flagged as unsourced since 2008, without ever seeing a whit of improvement. Bearcat ( talk) 21:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Article about a band, not making or sourcing any claim to passing
WP:MUSIC. As written, this literally just states that the band exists, without even attempting to state anything about them that could even be measured against NMUSIC at all, and it cites no references whatsoever -- literally the only thing here at all is an external link to their profile on a social networking platform, which is not a notability-supporting source. As always, bands are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- they have to have reliable source coverage in media, verifying one or more accomplishments that would satisfy NMUSIC, for an article to become earned. The article was once a lot longer than this prior to 2012, when the page creator blanked most of their own past work on it -- but simply restoring the old version of the article wouldn't save it, because it was still fundamentally advertorial content still not supported by any reliable sourcing.
And for added bonus, the article has literally gone almost completely untouched since then, with just four minor new edits over the next eight years combined, which doesn't speak well of the prospect of salvaging it with new notability claims or sourcing either: if they had accomplished almost anything since 2012 that would have made them appreciably more notable, somebody would already have added it to the article.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 03:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
This article is about a fake university, or at least an organization that does not seem to be an educational institution of tertiary or any other level.
This is not an officially recognised university in Uruguay, neither an officially recognized "universitary institute" (lower category of tertiary universitary institutions with lesser academic offer), and also is not a tertiary non-universitary recognized institution.
It does not seem to be a former University since I could not find any past reliable references about this. The claim of that this institution was founded in 1970 is not what the cited source said. Moreover, is worth to say that the private universitary institutions began to open in 1984 with Catholic University of Uruguay (that reopened since its closure as an organization with tertiary grades in late 19th century), and before this year of 1984 the only university in the country was the public University of the Republic (ORT Uruguay was established as an organization in 1940s, but recognized as University in 1990s).
An older version of the website https://web.archive.org/web/20150215070136/http://www.cdes.edu.uy/ states that it was at that time registered at the Civil Associations and Foundations Registry of the Ministry of Education and Culture of Uruguay, but this does not mean it was an university, furthermore it cannot be taken as a proof unless a non-affiliated source would be provided.
The older (archived) website stated it was based in "Avda Artigas 673, Juan Lacaze, Colonia, Uruguay", but the newer (archived) website "Zorrilla de San Martin 526, Rosario, Colonia, Uruguay". Both mentions religious activities led by "Daniel Esteban Odin". The current version of the website does not even say anything about activities in Uruguay at all, just links websites of its affiliated organizations in countries in Central America. The current version of the website seems to be usurped by another (unrelated) alleged organization (that could be linked to an US based organization), that in appearance is different of what it looked like and it is poorly designed with tons of plain links.
Searches in Google Maps street view did not reveal the location of the headquarters and its building, not in the claimed one in Juan Lacaze city neither the claimed one in Rosario city.
The article says "It was the only private university in the state of Colonia, Uruguay Country for 11 years until 2007.", and it is clear that who wrote the article does not know enough about Uruguay, because first level administrative division of the country are "departments", not "states". And is also worth to know that it claims to have around 10,000 students (in a city with a population of 10,085 inhabitants in 2011; the department of Colonia where the city is part of has 123,203 inhabitants), while properly established and well know private Uruguayan universities have 5,000~10,000 students and the main public university has 100,000 students.
I could research more, but I think this is enough to consider the deletion of this article. I would like to add that since Wikipedia started to spread this false information in internet a circular reference began to spread in https://academicinfluence.com/schools/28220974/College-of-the-Holy-Spirit-of-Rosario/.
Precedent: it seems to be related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Handbook of Universities and the hoax spreaded by the author of the article, Taesulkim. There even mentions "Prof.+Daniel+Odin+(Ph.D.)" in a linked website. Onwa ( talk) 20:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep WP:SNOW based on changes since nomination and nominator's comment below. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 16:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Every article in this page has people with similar, but distinct full names. There are short hatnotes on all three of the articles that make it is a lot easier to navigate for people who accidentally made a typo or need a distinguishment per WP:HATCHEAP. And before anyone asks, I have looked throughout Wikipedia to see if there was anyone else with a name similar to Stephen (or Steve) Darby (or Derby) and I couldn't find any at all. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 19:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
-football
to the search helped.) --
JHunterJ (
talk)
11:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
"In general, all colleges and universities are de facto notable and should be included on Wikipedia."
However, this "university" isn't accredited and is not recognized by the United States Department of Education. I can't find any independent, reliable sources on it.
Amazingly, it seems as though the majority of search results for "Westbrook University" involve articles mentioning individuals with the last name of Westbrook that happen to have University as the next word.
I don't see how it meets any general requirement of notability and doesn't even seem to meet the criteria of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 18:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 02:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
I initially tried to redirect to TEDMED but it's been contested. Hodosh is not independently notable of TEDMED and this article should be deleted and redirected to TEDMED as there are no sufficient sources about Hodosh directly. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Respectfuly disagree, as this page has been in place since 2012, plenty of sufficient sources online as well as individual's other businesses are of notable mention. Also appears TEDMED was sold, so that is not an appropriate redirect while his new business involves Dr. Sanjay Gupta, with high notability. His previous colleagues have existing pages as well with no contention.
With brief search, additional source links for page notability include:
https://blog.ted.com/tedmed_a_new_pa/
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/15402
Open to discussion but especially during these particular times, I think better to keep such health related pages active.----- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.218.184.166 ( talk) 17:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
In reply to: "His "colleagues" having articles is also 100% irrelevant.": It's relevant in this instance as it's of the same nature. Chris Anderson (notable for TED) or Richard Wurman both have similar pages. Also, see above links for independent sources from Entrepreneur Magazine, Forbes, Xconomy, and others. Also additional in-depth links include Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0108-8
This page could use work, but believe it's appropriate, with sources found on page as well. No major objections. Rather than back and forth, open to other opinions. Stay safe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.218.184.166 ( talk) 18:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
All of the above provide extensive coverage, and there are more refs than what I have included here. But I just accidentally hit publish (distracted on this Covid-19 morning) so leaving it here. (I will work on a rewrite of the article because I have nothing but time.) JSFarman ( talk) 13:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL, lacks any references or sources Dan arndt ( talk) 17:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Could not find any multiple reliable sources to establish notability in. Moreover, there's also nothing on Age Of Civilizations 1, either, in my searching. -- MuZemike 17:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a person notable only for participating in the renovation and reopening of two local movie theatres in a single city, not referenced well enough to get him over WP:GNG for it. Two of the seven footnotes here are blogs, and one is a community hyperlocal, which aren't sources that help to get him over GNG at all -- and while the other four sources are real daily newspapers and a book, they all just briefly namecheck Rui Pereira's existence within coverage of other things rather than being substantively about him. As always, people aren't automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because their name has been mentioned a few times in the local media -- the more localized a person's notability claim is, the better they have to be sourced before they actually clear the notability bar in an international encyclopedia, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to show more than just a few brief mentions of his name in coverage of other things. Bearcat ( talk) 17:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 18:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Non notable actor has played no significant roles. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Cant seem to find any independent coverage on him. - FitIndia Talk Commons 16:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NPOL, only position is in local government. Only source just says she is the daughter of a state government minister. MB 16:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bernie Sanders#Early life. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 02:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
No notability or accomplishments whatsoever. Notability is not inherited. Kbabej ( talk) 16:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. My reasoning to nominate this page for deletion was a little shortsighted and now seeing as how it can be expanded, I am withdrawing my nomination. ( non-admin closure) KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 16:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Only two other articles in the disambiguation page. It's a lot easier to use a hatnote at the top of the page per WP:HATCHEAP. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 14:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to WONB. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:55, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Radio station of unclear notability that doesn't exist yet. ... discospinster talk 13:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Obvious. A one-liner without any references and the subject is a given name. Fails notability. AhmadLX- (Wikiposta) 13:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails to establish notability – sourced primarily to the manufacturer's website, the few remaining references are to market news aggregators and infomercials. I haven't succeeded in finding independent secondary sources. Article created and predominantly edited by a single-purpose account, and the promotional tone makes one suspect a COI. kashmīrī TALK 12:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
i'm not even sure what N criteria this would fall under but it doesn't meet any and is rather unencyclopedic. Praxidicae ( talk) 12:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
This period is neither distinct or long enough to merit its own page. The article History of Thailand (1932–1973) covers this topic already. Sodacan ( talk) 11:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY BlameRuiner ( talk) 11:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I can't find any reviews or any significant coverage of this documentary in Swedish or in English. The film exists, the sources verify that (and I think I'll try to find time to watch it as it seems interesting) but that doesn't mean it is notable. It is simply a UR documentary like many many others; I'm a fan of UR, they produce good stuff, but this fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NFILM. I thought that perhaps the filmmaker might be notable enough so there could be an article about him which this could redirect to, but I haven't even been able to find sources for that. bonadea contributions talk 10:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable band, famous in their own lunchtime in Australia. Article was created in 2006 and then ended with the sentence "The band are currently in pre-production for their debut full length album, The Long March" which it seems is still a work in progress. Releases are two EPs for Cartel Music and a self-released split EP. Nothing indicates any notability. Emeraude ( talk) 08:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Promotional. Lack of reliable secondary sources to pass the notability. - The9Man ( Talk) 07:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 18:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
A non notable actor, article inappropriately using only IMDB as a source. Research shows that some of the article’s credits weren’t even credited roles, and most were minor appearances. No evidence of substantial secondary sources that could help improve article. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 07:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. The article was originally created by a copywriter for the company, and has changed little in the intervening years. The sources provided are passing mentions and listings only, and a search for more has only provided press releases (presumably produced by the article's author) and a single interview with the company's director. Yunshui 雲 水 07:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 22:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Not notable - not every tiny podcast needs a Wiki page. Yellow-billed Loon ( talk) 06:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The article would benefit from a consensus as to whether or not it's a WP:NOTNEWS violation. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ ping}} me after replying off my talk page 04:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
A check of WP:BEFORE sees no result in English with the Thai language only showing up five results, none of them possibly be suitable for WP:GNG. HawkAussie ( talk) 02:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and no sources other than the one in the article can be found. PotentPotables ( talk) 02:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Insect fighting. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 22:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
This article does not meet notability guidelines, as very few sources link to it. MiasmaEternal TALK 01:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf ( talk) 20:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
List of awards and nominations for a non-notable porn performer deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keisha (actress). This content may be a re-creation of content deleted at Keisha (actress). Even if it isn't, the consensus at the AfD discussion was that the list lacked independent sources to establish notability. No new facts have emerged in the 3 months since then. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 15:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
This doesn't warrant it's own article and it's not encyclopedic Novalia ( talk) 23:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Oppose: Keep article, as these : Category:Acting families also have articles: Nominator appears biased and just wants to start shit by disrespecting.
-- Discographer ( talk) 01:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to ABBYY FineReader. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 15:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be a none notable software company. All the sources are to either press releases or the companies website. Nothing comes up in a Google search either. Except for trivial coverage that doesn't pass WP:NCORP. Adamant1 ( talk) 23:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I see no indication this player passes WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG. Govvy ( talk) 22:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Leaning towards keep. People disagree about the quality of the sources, but there's clearly no consensus that they're inadequate. Sandstein 21:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
"entity" that was merged into MasterCard. The article hasn't had any sources since 2014 and nothing comes up for it in a Google search except for Wikipedia spin off sites and brief mentions in personal blogs. Adamant1 ( talk) 22:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
UK based waste control company that doesn't seem to be notable. It's had a notability banner on it since 2010, the sources are all trivial or not reliable, and nothing about them that meets notability standards for companies comes up in a Google search. Adamant1 ( talk) 22:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMODEL, article in ru-wiki was deleted. Gruznov ( talk) 19:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:CRIN as has not played first-class/List A/t20 cricket and under-19 cricketers are not notable. StickyWicket ( talk) 21:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was draftify. Moved to Draft:Arienne Mandi. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actress, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NACTOR. As always, actors and actresses are not all automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- they need to have reliable source coverage about them to verify that they pass a notability criterion, such as having multiple (meaning more than one) major (meaning not just one-off guest shots on TV shows she wasn't a regular cast member of) roles and/or winning or getting nominated for a major acting award. But there are just three sources here (four footnotes, but one of them is a repetition of one of the others), of which two — her IMDb profile and her cast bio on the self-published production website of the show she's on — are not reliable or notability-supporting sources at all. And while the other one is a real (albeit paywalled) magazine article, it appears as far as I can tell to be a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself in the first person — which is a type of source we can use for supplementary verification of stray facts after the person has already gotten over GNG on better ones, but not a type of source that brings a GNG pass all by itself if it's the best sourcing on offer. And even if I'm wrong and it is a real article written in the third person, a person still has to have more than just one of those to pass our notability criteria.
As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she's got stronger sourcing, but just being verifiable as a working actor is not an automatic notability freebie that would exempt her from having to be referenced better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
An impressive amount of subscribers, but there isn't coverage in reliable sources to match. Does not meet WP:GNG, article creator appears to be a UPE creating articles about the channel's productions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The only notability claim being attempted here is that some of their music was included in the soundtrack to a video game -- but that still isn't an instant inclusion freebie in the absence of any reliable source coverage about the band, because we still have to be able to verify that the notability claim is true, and even our article about the video game doesn't claim that any of their music is in it. Furthermore, this has been flagged as unsourced since 2008, without ever seeing a whit of improvement. Bearcat ( talk) 21:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Article about a band, not making or sourcing any claim to passing
WP:MUSIC. As written, this literally just states that the band exists, without even attempting to state anything about them that could even be measured against NMUSIC at all, and it cites no references whatsoever -- literally the only thing here at all is an external link to their profile on a social networking platform, which is not a notability-supporting source. As always, bands are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- they have to have reliable source coverage in media, verifying one or more accomplishments that would satisfy NMUSIC, for an article to become earned. The article was once a lot longer than this prior to 2012, when the page creator blanked most of their own past work on it -- but simply restoring the old version of the article wouldn't save it, because it was still fundamentally advertorial content still not supported by any reliable sourcing.
And for added bonus, the article has literally gone almost completely untouched since then, with just four minor new edits over the next eight years combined, which doesn't speak well of the prospect of salvaging it with new notability claims or sourcing either: if they had accomplished almost anything since 2012 that would have made them appreciably more notable, somebody would already have added it to the article.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 03:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
This article is about a fake university, or at least an organization that does not seem to be an educational institution of tertiary or any other level.
This is not an officially recognised university in Uruguay, neither an officially recognized "universitary institute" (lower category of tertiary universitary institutions with lesser academic offer), and also is not a tertiary non-universitary recognized institution.
It does not seem to be a former University since I could not find any past reliable references about this. The claim of that this institution was founded in 1970 is not what the cited source said. Moreover, is worth to say that the private universitary institutions began to open in 1984 with Catholic University of Uruguay (that reopened since its closure as an organization with tertiary grades in late 19th century), and before this year of 1984 the only university in the country was the public University of the Republic (ORT Uruguay was established as an organization in 1940s, but recognized as University in 1990s).
An older version of the website https://web.archive.org/web/20150215070136/http://www.cdes.edu.uy/ states that it was at that time registered at the Civil Associations and Foundations Registry of the Ministry of Education and Culture of Uruguay, but this does not mean it was an university, furthermore it cannot be taken as a proof unless a non-affiliated source would be provided.
The older (archived) website stated it was based in "Avda Artigas 673, Juan Lacaze, Colonia, Uruguay", but the newer (archived) website "Zorrilla de San Martin 526, Rosario, Colonia, Uruguay". Both mentions religious activities led by "Daniel Esteban Odin". The current version of the website does not even say anything about activities in Uruguay at all, just links websites of its affiliated organizations in countries in Central America. The current version of the website seems to be usurped by another (unrelated) alleged organization (that could be linked to an US based organization), that in appearance is different of what it looked like and it is poorly designed with tons of plain links.
Searches in Google Maps street view did not reveal the location of the headquarters and its building, not in the claimed one in Juan Lacaze city neither the claimed one in Rosario city.
The article says "It was the only private university in the state of Colonia, Uruguay Country for 11 years until 2007.", and it is clear that who wrote the article does not know enough about Uruguay, because first level administrative division of the country are "departments", not "states". And is also worth to know that it claims to have around 10,000 students (in a city with a population of 10,085 inhabitants in 2011; the department of Colonia where the city is part of has 123,203 inhabitants), while properly established and well know private Uruguayan universities have 5,000~10,000 students and the main public university has 100,000 students.
I could research more, but I think this is enough to consider the deletion of this article. I would like to add that since Wikipedia started to spread this false information in internet a circular reference began to spread in https://academicinfluence.com/schools/28220974/College-of-the-Holy-Spirit-of-Rosario/.
Precedent: it seems to be related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Handbook of Universities and the hoax spreaded by the author of the article, Taesulkim. There even mentions "Prof.+Daniel+Odin+(Ph.D.)" in a linked website. Onwa ( talk) 20:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep WP:SNOW based on changes since nomination and nominator's comment below. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 16:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Every article in this page has people with similar, but distinct full names. There are short hatnotes on all three of the articles that make it is a lot easier to navigate for people who accidentally made a typo or need a distinguishment per WP:HATCHEAP. And before anyone asks, I have looked throughout Wikipedia to see if there was anyone else with a name similar to Stephen (or Steve) Darby (or Derby) and I couldn't find any at all. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 19:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
-football
to the search helped.) --
JHunterJ (
talk)
11:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
"In general, all colleges and universities are de facto notable and should be included on Wikipedia."
However, this "university" isn't accredited and is not recognized by the United States Department of Education. I can't find any independent, reliable sources on it.
Amazingly, it seems as though the majority of search results for "Westbrook University" involve articles mentioning individuals with the last name of Westbrook that happen to have University as the next word.
I don't see how it meets any general requirement of notability and doesn't even seem to meet the criteria of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 18:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 02:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
I initially tried to redirect to TEDMED but it's been contested. Hodosh is not independently notable of TEDMED and this article should be deleted and redirected to TEDMED as there are no sufficient sources about Hodosh directly. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Respectfuly disagree, as this page has been in place since 2012, plenty of sufficient sources online as well as individual's other businesses are of notable mention. Also appears TEDMED was sold, so that is not an appropriate redirect while his new business involves Dr. Sanjay Gupta, with high notability. His previous colleagues have existing pages as well with no contention.
With brief search, additional source links for page notability include:
https://blog.ted.com/tedmed_a_new_pa/
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/15402
Open to discussion but especially during these particular times, I think better to keep such health related pages active.----- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.218.184.166 ( talk) 17:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
In reply to: "His "colleagues" having articles is also 100% irrelevant.": It's relevant in this instance as it's of the same nature. Chris Anderson (notable for TED) or Richard Wurman both have similar pages. Also, see above links for independent sources from Entrepreneur Magazine, Forbes, Xconomy, and others. Also additional in-depth links include Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0108-8
This page could use work, but believe it's appropriate, with sources found on page as well. No major objections. Rather than back and forth, open to other opinions. Stay safe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.218.184.166 ( talk) 18:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
All of the above provide extensive coverage, and there are more refs than what I have included here. But I just accidentally hit publish (distracted on this Covid-19 morning) so leaving it here. (I will work on a rewrite of the article because I have nothing but time.) JSFarman ( talk) 13:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL, lacks any references or sources Dan arndt ( talk) 17:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Could not find any multiple reliable sources to establish notability in. Moreover, there's also nothing on Age Of Civilizations 1, either, in my searching. -- MuZemike 17:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a person notable only for participating in the renovation and reopening of two local movie theatres in a single city, not referenced well enough to get him over WP:GNG for it. Two of the seven footnotes here are blogs, and one is a community hyperlocal, which aren't sources that help to get him over GNG at all -- and while the other four sources are real daily newspapers and a book, they all just briefly namecheck Rui Pereira's existence within coverage of other things rather than being substantively about him. As always, people aren't automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because their name has been mentioned a few times in the local media -- the more localized a person's notability claim is, the better they have to be sourced before they actually clear the notability bar in an international encyclopedia, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to show more than just a few brief mentions of his name in coverage of other things. Bearcat ( talk) 17:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 18:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Non notable actor has played no significant roles. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Cant seem to find any independent coverage on him. - FitIndia Talk Commons 16:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NPOL, only position is in local government. Only source just says she is the daughter of a state government minister. MB 16:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bernie Sanders#Early life. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 02:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
No notability or accomplishments whatsoever. Notability is not inherited. Kbabej ( talk) 16:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. My reasoning to nominate this page for deletion was a little shortsighted and now seeing as how it can be expanded, I am withdrawing my nomination. ( non-admin closure) KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 16:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Only two other articles in the disambiguation page. It's a lot easier to use a hatnote at the top of the page per WP:HATCHEAP. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 14:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to WONB. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:55, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Radio station of unclear notability that doesn't exist yet. ... discospinster talk 13:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Obvious. A one-liner without any references and the subject is a given name. Fails notability. AhmadLX- (Wikiposta) 13:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails to establish notability – sourced primarily to the manufacturer's website, the few remaining references are to market news aggregators and infomercials. I haven't succeeded in finding independent secondary sources. Article created and predominantly edited by a single-purpose account, and the promotional tone makes one suspect a COI. kashmīrī TALK 12:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
i'm not even sure what N criteria this would fall under but it doesn't meet any and is rather unencyclopedic. Praxidicae ( talk) 12:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
This period is neither distinct or long enough to merit its own page. The article History of Thailand (1932–1973) covers this topic already. Sodacan ( talk) 11:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY BlameRuiner ( talk) 11:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I can't find any reviews or any significant coverage of this documentary in Swedish or in English. The film exists, the sources verify that (and I think I'll try to find time to watch it as it seems interesting) but that doesn't mean it is notable. It is simply a UR documentary like many many others; I'm a fan of UR, they produce good stuff, but this fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NFILM. I thought that perhaps the filmmaker might be notable enough so there could be an article about him which this could redirect to, but I haven't even been able to find sources for that. bonadea contributions talk 10:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable band, famous in their own lunchtime in Australia. Article was created in 2006 and then ended with the sentence "The band are currently in pre-production for their debut full length album, The Long March" which it seems is still a work in progress. Releases are two EPs for Cartel Music and a self-released split EP. Nothing indicates any notability. Emeraude ( talk) 08:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Promotional. Lack of reliable secondary sources to pass the notability. - The9Man ( Talk) 07:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 18:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
A non notable actor, article inappropriately using only IMDB as a source. Research shows that some of the article’s credits weren’t even credited roles, and most were minor appearances. No evidence of substantial secondary sources that could help improve article. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 07:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. The article was originally created by a copywriter for the company, and has changed little in the intervening years. The sources provided are passing mentions and listings only, and a search for more has only provided press releases (presumably produced by the article's author) and a single interview with the company's director. Yunshui 雲 水 07:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 22:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Not notable - not every tiny podcast needs a Wiki page. Yellow-billed Loon ( talk) 06:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The article would benefit from a consensus as to whether or not it's a WP:NOTNEWS violation. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ ping}} me after replying off my talk page 04:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
A check of WP:BEFORE sees no result in English with the Thai language only showing up five results, none of them possibly be suitable for WP:GNG. HawkAussie ( talk) 02:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and no sources other than the one in the article can be found. PotentPotables ( talk) 02:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Insect fighting. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 22:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
This article does not meet notability guidelines, as very few sources link to it. MiasmaEternal TALK 01:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf ( talk) 20:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
List of awards and nominations for a non-notable porn performer deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keisha (actress). This content may be a re-creation of content deleted at Keisha (actress). Even if it isn't, the consensus at the AfD discussion was that the list lacked independent sources to establish notability. No new facts have emerged in the 3 months since then. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)