![]() |
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted ( CSD A7) by Bbb23. ( non-admins closure) Jim Carter (from public cyber) 12:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Has had a deletion tag go up a few times but the person keeps on removing it. I say this should be deleted as there are no refs, could be an important person as the producing of a song is pretty big, but this seems iffy. Wgolf ( talk) 00:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Not seeing evidence that the subject of this BLP meets GNG or WP:PROF nor do I believe being the Inaugural Director of the Frederick Douglass Distinguished Scholars Program at American University is in itself notable. J04n( talk page) 23:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I have found no indication of coverage in reliable, independent sources for this book. A Google search turned up no usable sources. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Since Afds are not a vote, I'm closing this in favor of the side that has made the most solid arguments. Mark Arsten ( talk) 23:42, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm no expert in organised crime, but while there's some substance to it i.e. historical figures like Asiong Salonga, this apparently reeks of an elaborate hoax, not to mention that similar articles have been deleted before for the same reasons. Blake Gripling ( talk) 23:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 01:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Flagged this article for deletion because it fails to meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. This is a clear case of self-promotion as the page was created by a username that is an anagram of Mr. Stolyarov's full name.
Anonymous user 216.59.118.42 nominated this article for deletion on 20:36, 26 August 2014, for the following reason:
"Flagged this article for deletion because it fails to meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. This is a clear case of self-promotion as the page was created by a username that is an anagram of Mr. Stolyarov's full name."
Bird in the sun ( talk) 22:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
References
I object in principle to an AFD started by someone on behalf of a nonregistered user, there is no way around this, because unregistered users cannot create pages, which is necessary to start an AfD discussion (see WP:AFDHOWTO), and I believe it is policy of some sort (not necessarily WP:POLICY) that we should not force people to create accounts if they do not wish to. We do our best to notify the unregistered user that a nomination has been made, either on WT:AfD if they requested there (as was in this case) or on their talk page if they did elsewhere. Ansh 666 20:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Nothing has changed since the last AFD, which was closed as keep without quorum. Subject is not notable because of his association with Ross Perot, nor as a painter. Almost all claims in the article are unverifiable. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete a7 (nonnotable), g11 (self-promotion), WP:SNOW. See my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr sol adoni. NawlinWiki ( talk) 20:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Non- notable computer language. No citation here of independent WP:reliable sources, and virtually no pertinent hits in a verbatim Google search. Previously PRODded but article's creator unPRODded it. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 18:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Drprinceton ( talk) 19:25, 26 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton
Dr. Adoni is the figure behind HelixQ. His 30Mod Prime theory in 1995 is now known to be th fastest Prime Algorithm due to bench mark tests in PyPrimes. Wiki Needs a page on Dr. Adoni, HelixQ and his 8 Prime Spirals. So far one Russian is trying to keep the info off of Wiki, and he is not qualified to judge such major new prime work. The 30Mod Prime algorithm predates the sieve of Atkin a 60Mod prime theory also discussed by Dr. Adoni years before and his 90Mod work is relevant as well.
Drprinceton ( talk) 19:25, 26 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton
The result was Speedy delete, WP:SPAM and WP:SNOW. Author's argument is "the world is conspiring against me to keep me and my theory from becoming known". That won't work here. NawlinWiki ( talk) 20:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Because the article makes him sound significant, I'm not speedying this, but I can't find evidence of notability for this living person. Few Google hits, no Google Scholar hits, and the word "ennisa" itself returns only 208 hits in a Google search, with none that I can see in a quick scan giving the impression of being an organization that publishes papers on mathematical topics. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 18:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
This editor is trying to supress information about Dr Adoni and his 8 Prime Spirals released in 1995. Since then his 30Mod prime work was used by Sieve of Atkin 60mod work. Dr. Adoni is well known since he has authored many books and there are many news articles on him. The person trying to delete this page which is needed due to the 8 prime spiral of Dr. Adoni and his HelixQ work as well, is a lone Russian editor trying to keep the world ignorant of the major prime discoveries of Dr. Adoni. PyPrimes was used to verify how significant the 8 prime spirals are, since they out performed all prime algorithms tested included wheel factorization and seive of Eratosthenes. So the page is needed as a reference to the work of Dr. Adoni, that being his 1995 paper the Ennisa Formula in which 30mod, 60mod and 90mod prime algorithms were discussed. Since that work 60mod prime algorithm work of Atkin has been accepted as a major advance in primality, even though it was really discovered almost 10 years earlier. There are many usenet debates from the 1990's over how important this discovery was. Now 20 years later with PyPrimes and the sieve of Atkin being found to be significant work, the original work of Dr Adoni should be cited properly at Wiki. To ignore his 1995 work that is well documented in Usenet from the 1990's would be a gross violation of acknowledging the real discover of 30mod, 60mod and 90mod prime theory. Drprinceton ( talk) 19:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton
Drprinceton, commenting after close with a statement starting with "Wiki nazis" isn't really conducive to changing anybody's mind about speedy deleting this. If you object to the close, please take it to
Deletion review. In the meantime, this is being confined as it's wholly immaterial to the nomination above, which is closed.
Nate • (
chatter)
00:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
|
---|
Drprinceton ( talk) 00:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton Wiki nazis have already deleted the 3 articles, it's why most in Academia consider wiki to be a JOKE. The original article was ocmpletely neutral despite what some mod happy person believes. The fact wiki deleted all 3 articles shows how slanted wiki is. FACTS 2012 prime spirals were PROVEN in a test by PyPrimes part of the Python Project to be faster than all known prime algorithms, that's MAJOR NEWS and the 8 Prime Spirals are what this new algorithm is called. Now there is some minor debate about who theorized the 30Mod Prime Spirals and besides 30Mod prime spirals being front and center in PyPrimes a GITHUB project that an real expert forum on mathematics compared to wiki, the work done in PyPrimes testing the sieve of Eratosthenes (a wiki article) and prime wheel factorization (a wiki article) all got beaten in speed by 8 PRIME SPIRALS. THAT IS MAJOR MATHEMATICS NEWS Now the 60Mod prime algorithm known as sieve of Atkin has a wiki page too, so Python the computer language project that test the prime algorithms, the ancient sieve of Eratosthenes, sieve of Atkins, prime wheel factorization all have WIKI PAGES, yet the new kid on the block that BEAT THEM ALL and the test was done at GITHUB the top site for such open academic evaluations IMO, says 8 Prime Spirals or 30Mod prime algorithm IS THE KING OF THE HILL in creating primes. It beat all the algorithms you have pages on. Yet the new fast algorithm you want to ignore. PyPrimes used GITHUB to verify the results. Anyone can download PyPrimes and test all the prime algorithms YOU HAVE PAGES ON, and they all lose compared to 8 PRIME SPIRALS yet this site (wiki) is now deleting any mention of the 8 Prime Spirals, the person who created it in 1995 and his new project a new computer language using his now proven math theories. So GITHUB was cited, Python is a major wiki page, wheel factorization is a major wiki page, sieve of Eratosthenes is a major wiki page and even the sieve of Atkin all have pages. YOU SEE WHAT A JOKE WIKI IS deleting the proven fastest algrithm that people are now SEARCHING FOR INFO ON. Anyone can see the original article it was neutral, yet wiki allowed it to be deleted. /info/en/?search=8_prime_spirals Now there is controvsey over the claims to who discovered 30Mod prime theory, and Usenet has numerous of posts showing Dr. Adoni was discussing 30Mod, 60Mod and 90Mod prime algorithms. SO IT IS HIS WORK. Yet in 2004 Atkin comes along and now you have a page about his 60Mod theory, guess what 60Mod prime theory and 30Mod and 90Mod were all discussed in the 1990's in usenet due to DR ADONI's work. Now do any of you see how foolish wiki looks deleting the page. So does a test PROVING the significance of 30Mod prime algorithm being fastest than all known prime algorithms that all have wiki pages warrant a page for the KING OF PRIMES ALGORITHMS? YES IT DOES For anyone to say test results subject to peer review by academics on GITHUB is not a trusted source look foolish. SO THE CITE TO THE TESTS on GITHUB via PYPRIMES is defacto proof of a neutral source to make the claims. OR DO NONE OF YOU GET THAT? GITHUB is the neutral source CITED as proof 8 Prime Spirals are now KING OF THE HILL in primality, and that is NEWS WORTHY. Since wiki has so much stuff on the slower primes to not have a page on the 8 Prime Spirals citing GITHUB and PYPRIMES as proof it is real, is a JOKE. Anyway, I'll just email the Adoni group what this site is doing and how they think I'm him, or an assoicate, so they can laugh at WIKI and maybe put notice on their network to the moronic statments made here. PUT THE PAGE BACK a. The cite to GITHUB and PYPRIMES open source test is PROOF of the claims, anyone can download Python and PyPrimes and test all the algorithms YOU HAVE PAGES ON and guess what Einsteins, all your wiki page algorithms LOSE to the Prime Spirals. b. Sieve of Atkins uses 60Mod prime theory, guess what Dr. Adoni had it in his work on 30Mod prime TEN YEARS EARLIER, so his work is connected to that as well. C. Prime Wheel Factorization a wiki page, it lost to the Adoni Prime Spirals too, yet you think wiki should not discuss prime spiral theory? D. Sieve of Eratosthenes, 2300 years old now and the first prime algorithm to out perform it, THE ADONI PRIME SPIRALS Now the article noted Atkins is using work that was public for almost 10 years. The article noted an ERROR in calling the prime spirals croft spirals since Steven Croft claimed to have discovered them in 2010. Yet the fact is Usenet has the discussion on 30Mod, 60Mod and 90Mod prime theory in the 1990's way before Atkin or Croft made any claims to them. Anyway, to see sledge hammer nazi level censorship at wiki shows why WIKI IS A JOKE to academics. For this topic to say GITHUB is not a major cite is a JOKE. For this topic to say a new prime algorithm that has beaten all the prime algorithms listed on Wiki is a JOKE as to the topic not being relevant. PUT THE PAGE BACK /info/en/?search=8_prime_spirals Drprinceton ( talk) 00:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton |
The result was speedy delete as hoax. How did this survive for three years? Being an orphan may be one reason. Now preserved for your delight at Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Pilot Season (film). — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 14:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Feels definitely like a hoax to me. Freshh! ( talk) 18:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G4 was declined without a clear reason as to why being provided. Reasons from the last afd still apply. He has still not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:51, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
*Delete - Fails
WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a
fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy
GNG.
Fenix down (
talk)
12:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
:Fully Agree with you that he is not notable at the moment hence did not vote keep and only on the bench
till now.
Pharaoh of the Wizards (
talk)
18:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 03:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010, lets make a decision either way. Unreferenced, I don't believe it has lasting notability Gbawden ( talk) 12:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Original concern was that the subject has not competed at a level of cricket considered notable by WP:CRIN, but the PROD was removed with the rationale that he "may not have played First-class, List A or T20 matches till now. But he has already played Youth ODI matches. He is also in Nepal's squad for 2014 Asian Games and Nepal have recently been awarded T20I status. So the days are not so far when Ramnaresh will be playing those matches as well. So I believe it's not important to delete the article right now. Have patience!" But the article still fails WP:CRIN. Ytfc23 ( talk) 11:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was wrong venue - you need Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion ( Non-admin closure. St★lwart 111 13:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Misleading Page title as the page where is directed is never called "Mass Rail Transit" PhilippineRevolution ( talk) 10:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was wrong venue - you need Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion ( Non-admin closure. St★lwart 111 13:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Misleading title causing confusion to readers as all pages linking to this page are now fixed and directed to the corrected page PhilippineRevolution ( talk) 10:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7 at author's request. JohnCD ( talk) 21:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Seems promotional, unreferenced and a most likely is non-notable. NickGibson3900 Talk Sign my Guestbook Contributions 09:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
This was a once off match, believe it fails WP:SPORTSEVENT Gbawden ( talk) 06:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
I stand by my prod rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (organizations) requirement." Deprodded by creator "Object to deletion because Kopernik (organization) is a registered NPO in the US and had successful ongoing activities for the past 4 years". I am afraid this is simply not sufficient defense in light of the cited policies. PS. It's a shame that the creator was not trying to save valuable encyclopedic images showing that NGO's work in developing countries ( commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Waterfilters.jpg and others). PPS. See related AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewa Wojkowska. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Missing notability according to the notability guidelines, this artcile obviously serves only self promotional purpose. This person has actually done nothing notable. Except one fanbook about the Three Investigators and one satirical audiobook he did with his brother all his books are self published by his own organisation which lacks in notability also, no medial coverage about him, we had the fun with him and the 60 sockpuppets around him and his organisation in the german wikipedia before the deletion of both articles because of no notability. Seader ( talk) 04:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:48, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Missing notability according to the notability criteria, this article obviously serves self promotional purpose. This organisation has done nothing notable and I cant see any of the criterias for notability fullfilled. Since it offers commercial oriented consulting and advertising services to small number newspapers (for this actions there is also no independent source given) and is a snall self publisher ( publishing only its own books) it is to be seen as a commercial organisation. No widespread medial coverage about it ( in the last 20 years around 20 journalistic articles where it gets mentioned but only menioned). There is no office, it is a mailbox organisation without an office and only run by the founder Björn Akstinat himself and according to his saying supported by 10 volunters somewhere in germany (for which there is also no independent source), from his own or parents home (this is where the address given by the IMH leads to), where from he runs also his second organsiation for german music. Also for the so-called members of the IMH workgroup there is no independent and reliable source given. The data this IMH gives as results of their research is the result of Björn Akstinat himself using Google how he himself admits in an interviev published at the 25/06/2014 in a blog. We had already the fun with the company spam of 60 sockpuppets around this organisation in the german wikipedia before the deletion of this article since of missing notability.
Is a private mailbox organisation which is run by one person from his own or his parents home with no independent medial coverage about its specific actions or work really notable for the Wikipedia. I doubt that. Seader ( talk) 03:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Seems to fail Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 13:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
The range is not notable, as virtually every major military installation has a shooting range, and there is nothing special about this one. Yes, there are citations about it out there, but that does not mean that this establishes notability. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 05:51, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by admin RHaworth as copyright infringement ( non-admin closure). St★lwart 111 09:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
I AFD'ed this article 3.5 years ago, with the nom meeting with no consensus and only two participants. Possible academic notability, but serious conflict of interest concerns with both the creator of the article (see the first AfD) and with the editor responsible for most of the changes since then, User:Mguetl. A search for Guetl on the site brings up a Martina Guetl in management of the IDIAP Research Institute—which also conveniently has its own article, heavily edited by Ms. Guetl.
As to the article itself, there are no external references. Large chunks of text have been lifted from the IM2 website (compare the third paragraph in the second section with this page from the site). Additionally, the text itself is rather promotional in nature ("It is a unique program combining state-of-art technologies and cutting edge research..."). Raymie ( t • c) 05:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Number 5 7 12:00, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Best known as a frontman from a non notable band ( afd). Lacks coverage in reliable sources. Prod removed without comment. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
I disagree with user Duffbeerforme with their claim of Seven Factor in no notable and should be deleted for "being best known as front man for non notable band". 1st, the band being reffered to as Non Notable, was notable. their wiki page was deleted due to act of vandalism...this entire proposal to delete seems to be based off of that one aspect of an obviously multi level career. 2nd. Seven Factor was also associated with notable bands such as Crossbreed ( artemis records) and 16VOLT ( METROPOLIS RECORDS) Links to these bands are on the wiki page. 3rd. Seven Factor is the resident engineer at the world famous KDS STUDIOS in Orlando Florida,Formally transcon studios which launched such bands as NSYNC and the backstreet boys. Eminem has done his last 3 albums in this studio. His clients in this studio include some of the top selling artists on the billboard charts past and present. 4th. As a solo artists he has done remixes for notable bands Such as Tweaker, and Psyclon Nine.. and has a FACEBOOK VERIFIED Facebook page of just under 60,000 followers. 5th.As a producer and engineer he works closely and collaborates on projects with grammy and platinum sales award winning artists such as Chris Vrenna( Nine Inch Nails. Marilyn Manson, Knarles Barkley, Tweaker,) and Sara Lee Lucas( original Drummer for Marilyn Manson) 5th. As a multi media artists Seven Factor has done Video woe for such Notable bands as KMFDM, and CombiChrist... as well as mobile apps on the iTunes and android platform for Combichrist. It is obvious that Seven Factor has a long lasting, and very well established career in the music industry in many aspects of the filed , with many different bands .. not just 1 that was mistakenly deemed " not notable" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.251.218 ( talk) 04:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
its not "inherited" but according to wiki guidelines he meets the requirements for being involved in projects with "Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians" - thats taken directly from the guideline.. perhaps you did not read the entire article and are focused only on one part. your incorrect statements lead me to believe that perhaps you did not notice he was involved in multiple notable bands.. and has worked on projects with multiple other notable musicians and producers like himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.251.218 ( talk) 16:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Finngall, Why do you think this should be deleted. You mentioned the Human Factors Lab AFD.. were you apart of that conversation?. I feel perhaps you are ignoring the examples shown that Seven Factor meets the Notability guideline requirements and are basing your "delete" comment on that previous Human Factors Lab page.. when its only slightly related to this.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:10F8:7FD9:D69A:20FF:FE61:9DF5 ( talk) 20:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Keep meets the following criteria for musicians as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MUSIC#Others. 4.Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country Example. Toured with KMFDM as support. here is one example of the extensive coverage of that north america tour http://www.steadymagazine.com/news/news-kmfdm-tour-north-america-this-august/ 6.Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles Seven Factor is currently working directly with members of KMFDM, Marilyn Manson, And Nine INch Nails — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:10F8:7FD9:D69A:20FF:FE61:9DF5 ( talk) 21:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Once again duffbeer is incorrect with his statements Was a member of 2 listed notable acts. Crossbreed ( Artemis records) and 16volt ( metropolis records) also Engineer/producer on one of crossbreeds Albums. As far as the "notability not inherited" statement. The guideline states at least 2 notable members involved in project. So listed notable members other than himself involved on projects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.251.218 ( talk) 06:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
That's your opinion mr duffbeer. The facts however are all listed and have sources showing it meets the notability guidelines. Seven factor has been a member of multiple notable bands as a musician. Has worked on many notable projects as a music producer. And has worked directly with other notable musicians and producers on those projects. He is a resident is house Engibeer in a notable recording studio with over 200k RIAA sales. There have been multiple examples of why this page should be kept. However only 1 is needed. Correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.251.218 ( talk) 06:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Duffbeer was a part of the Discussion to delete Human Factors Lab. . His nomination to delete this thread is no coincidence. he is basing his motives for wanting this page deleted almost Entirely on the notability of Human Factors Lab as decided by that dsicussion, and not taking into full account the other aspects that should be taken into consideration when deciding if Seven Factor should be kept or not — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:10F8:7FD9:D69A:20FF:FE61:9DF5 ( talk) 03:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Addressing you previous post MrDuffBeer... lies and conspiracy is a strong words..lets take a step back from what appears to be an emotionally driven pursuit to have this page delted, and address the exact facts
Human Factors Lab -there was a call for deletion of the HFL page was because a user called "Bringthemdown" requested it.. this user was a former band member and created this account for the soul purpose of vandalizing the Human Factors Lab account. There was an extremely long deletion conversation about it. a large majority was made of of current band members voting to keep it, and previous band members voting to delete it. However there were a few people involved that were just regular wiki users that also voted to keep it.. in the end these votes were ignored, and Human Factors Lab was deemed not notable by wiki standards despite being a signed band 14 MAJOR US and Canadian tours under their belt and 8 albums releases , .. . That decision was made.. nothing we can do about that . So if thats your reason for saying Seven Factor is not notable because he was a member of that band. Ok.. We will give you that one. so lets put that aspect behind us now and focuss on the other elements.
-Seven Factor as a solo musician and producer has been Facebook verified with a verified Facebook fan base of just under 60 thousand fans. he is currently working on a studio album under that name. Other studio members of this ensemble include Chris Vrenna of Nine Inch Nails and Mariln Manson fame. And Steve White of KMFDM fame. So in this sense, Seven Factor is indeed an ensemble, with at least 2 notable members as per wiki guidelines
-Crossbreed. Seven Factor was the engineer/producer on the crossbreed New Slave Nation EP During this time frame he was also 1 of 2 keyboardists. you are correct, he is not credited on the crossbreed wiki site.. however is credited on the actual CD. Maybe someone reading this has a copy. I do not
-16VOLT. Like Many industrial bands 16volt is lead by 1 main person Eric Powel.. Other examples of this include Nine Inch Nail( trent Reznor) , KMFDM, ( Sascha), and Minitry( al jourgensen). .. 16volt by design is a band signed to Metropolis records as 1 person. It is considered a "super group" Eric Powel, the main driving force and only permanent member of that band, recruits other well known musicians in the Genera to perform when he tours. This was the case in the 2008 Denial Hwy tour, Featuring Seven Factor.. credited in a few of the MANY press released as S3ven as you pointed out. There are literally dozens of examples of reviews, announcements , ect from this tour mentioning Seven Factor as being a part of this band. if you would like i would be happy to ink them all, or feel free to google them yourself. Please let me know i you need me to link all of them and i will. The Fact that he was a "touring member" should not make him any less notable considering that 1. that is the nature of that band, and 2. he was chosen to be a part of it because he was considered notable by industrial music fans that attend 16volt shows.
Seven Factor is a music producer and musician. being a music producer, he works on many music projects with many well known musicians. We seem to have covered his own personal music career fairly well, but what are the guidelines concerning , albums, producers or audio engineers?....there are many well known engineers that are considered notable, but have never played in a "notable"band or are themselves considered an ensemble but are still vital parts of the recording process, and are considered notable in the music industry. Seven Factor is a resident producer at KDS music studio. This is one of the major recording studios in the country responsible for well over 200 million certified RIAA sales. Lets look at what that means. The People at one of the largest studios in the WOLRD , with some of the biggest artists in the industry ( Rhianna, Eminem, Dr Dre, Puff Daddy, Brittany Spears,NSync. backstreet boys)felt that Seven Factor was notable enough as a producer not just to invite him to work in this legendary facility, but to give him his own keys to the entire building, and his own office. As im sure you know.. Office space in facilities like this are not just given out, and are a rare thing to see in this industry.. other examples would be Pharrel has a simular office at south beach studios in Miami, fl . I think this speak volumes alone as to Seven Factors notability, however while at this studio he is working as a producer and engineer on a number the albums recording a number of major label artists. he is also working very closely,in an ensemble environment with members of Nine Inch Nails, Marilyn Manson, and KMFDM , they write songs together, for varies projects. Again.. I think that it should be considered the caliber of artists we are talking about. Now, it is obvious these artists are MORE notable than Seven Factor.. and with the amount of platinum albums and Grammies those artists have, it is not likely they would work with Seven Factor over the span of a few years of they did not view him as a peer in their industry
Regarding your claim of people lying, by saying it was an act of vandalism. It is easy to se by looking at the edit history of the HUman Factors Lab wiki page that it had been under attack of vandalism for a short time before the deletion request was put in. Do you need a link to show this as well? This was already addressed in the opening statement of this edit what took place there.
your "another lie" post. regarding touring Seven Factor was on a 45 date US/Canadian tour with KMFDM, , .. .. This was supported by Metrolpis Records, and there was coverage of the tour national by almost every major news outlet from rolling stone to the gauntlet as well as on a local level in every city news paper the tour visited. If you want to google KMFDM tour 2011 i am sure you will see dozens of examples of this. Seven Factor was an active member of this tour from its inception and represented on every flier and news coverage of the tour under the band name Human Factors Labin that same year he was involved in a 30 day tour with the band Mushroomhead .. 1 of 4 tours he had done with that band.If you are not familaru with Mushroomhead they just got off the recent mayhem tour which played to about 20K people a night, along side bands like Korn, and trivium. These tours were done under the name Human Factors Lab and are listed on each bands own wiki page. Listing Human Factors Lab
in closing, i strongly feel that duffbeer is basing his vote to delete based soley off of the Human Factors Lab deletion that took place.. in his mind.. If Human Factors Lab was deleted then Seven Factor must be deleted as well... in his mind he feels they are one in the same.. Lets be very clear that they are NOT the same. Seven Factor was the driving force behind Human Factors Lab... Just like Gene Simmons is the Driving force behind Kiss and Trent Reznor is the Driving force behind Nine Inch Nails......both examples have extensive careers outside of these bands.. Seven Factor is no different. I ask that the person making the desicion on this page please take this into consideration and make a fair decision based off of what it present here, not off of a previous thread — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:10F8:7FD9:D69A:20FF:FE61:9DF5 ( talk) 02:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I think the subject lacks the sufficient notability for actors. Only one useful references is presented, which indicate little notability. Article suffers from serious WP:COI and is the work of WP:SPA's, mainly here to promote Ravindra Prabhat and their family. The article creator and other main contributor are perhaps related to the subject. The author of the only useful reference is also part of this circle of SPA's.Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 01:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 17:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Wikpedia is not a Tv guide ( WP:NOTTVGUIDE). This article is totally unsourced, and I can't find any reliable sources with significant coverage to prove the wp:Notability. Vanjagenije ( talk) 17:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I created this article back in September of 2009 thinking that it was notable enough for Wikipedia. The problem with the article is that I feel it just doesn't meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia. It relies mostly on a primary source, with only a secondary source supporting it. I did another search to see if I could come up with any new sources that might better establish the notability of this company, but I was not able to find anything. Though it has been consistently ranked as a Top 100 Independant pizza chain (supported by the secondary source), I don't feel this is enough to pass WP:GNG. ArcAngel (talk) ) 07:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Very confusing article, it appears he does not meet WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 11:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Philg88 ♦ talk 06:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that he meets WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 07:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is no consensus to delete after two relistings. While I believe notability in this case is borderline, there are valid arguments from both keep/delete !voters. However neither side has established consensus for an alternative outcome. Philg88 ♦ talk 08:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources to establish notability. Nor does the article itself give a reason for notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS.
The article was previously PROD but the tag was removed by James500 with the comment, "Wikipedia is a gazateer. You are meant to look for sources with a search engine. Is in Google Maps."
To counter this I need point out that Wikipedia is not a gazetteer (geographical dictionary or directory used in conjunction with a map): see WP:NOTDIR. Nor is it a tourist guidebook: see WP:NOTGUIDE. The sister project, Wikivoyage, would be a better home for this content though I suspect that this road is too insignificant and lacking interest for Wikivoyage too.
It is insufficient to say that sources exist: see WP:LOTSOFSOURCES. You should name sources to prove notability. Before PROD a search was done. Before the AfD another search was done. This road is only mentioned as an address for various buildings or traffic ordinances. No source found gave any information about the road itself.
The existence of this road in Google Maps is irrelevant. Every road in the world seems to be in Google Maps: see Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability. Coverage in Google Maps does not prove notability. Rincewind42 ( talk) 08:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Delete non notable neologism [ [14]] Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 08:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. (Thanks Cavarrone for your improvements). ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 16:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
This article has been on Wikipedia since August, 2009 with hardly any marked improvement in it. In fact, there have been just 10 edits on this article in its lifetime. A search for sources to establish notability turned up nothing that I could determine. ArcAngel (talk) ) 03:58, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 17:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable casualty of the Cold War. We may want to consider DeBruin and this Cheney (not Dick) at the same time; but I figure deal with this one first. Orange Mike | Talk 00:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Article deleted per consensus but content has been merged into Labia pride as requested by 3 !voters Philg88 ♦ talk 06:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 20:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is no doubt that this article fails GNG, which leaves EricEnfermero's argument based on WP:AUTHOR. Unfortunately, it was not clear to me on what basis WP:AUTHOR is supposed to apply (ie, which of the bullet points) so not surprisingly there was no clear rebuttal of this argument either. However, I note that the book in question gets a decent number of citation. As Lesser Cartographies commented, an article about the book may be a better option. There was no clear consensus for this either, but it remains an option for future editor discussion. In the meantime, I am retaining the material in this article per WP:PRESERVE Spinning Spark 13:41, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
I could not establish that he meets WP:PROF or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 17:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Appears WP:TOOSOON at best. Does not seem to meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 16:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nelliyode Vasudevan Namboodiri. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
BLP that has been unsourced for over 6 years. No significant coverage found. Michig ( talk) 08:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of streets and roads in Hong Kong. (Non-admin closure.)-- 180.172.239.231 ( talk) 12:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS.
The article was previously PROD but the tag was removed by James500 with the comment, "Wikiped'ia is a gazateer. You are meant to look for sources with a search engine. Is in Google Maps. Plausible redirect."
To counter this I need point out that Wikipedia is |not a gazetteer (geographical dictionary or directory used in conjunction with a map): see WP:NOTDIR. Nor is it a tourist guidebook: see WP:NOTGUIDE. The sister project, Wikivoyage, would be a better home for this content.
It is insufficient to say that sources exist: see WP:LOTSOFSOURCES. You should name sources to prove notability. Before PROD a search was done. Before the AfD another search was done. This road is only mentioned as an address for various buildings or traffic ordinances. No source found gave any information about the road itself.
The existence of this road in Google Maps is irrelevant. Every road in the world seems to be in Google Maps: see Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability. Coverage in Google Maps does not prove notability. Rincewind42 ( talk) 08:05, 10 August 2014 (UTC) Rincewind42 ( talk) 08:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Fails notability. Created by someone with WP:COI. No significant coverage found in independent reliable sources. No attempt to provide evidence of notability. No external sourcing - in fact, relies entirely on its own website. SmileBlueJay97 talk 10:35, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. all Spinning Spark 22:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
WP:LISTCRUFT article showing by-episode team scores, game results and notes about contestants appearing on each episode of Only Connect. Article does not contain information that meets guidelines in WP:EPISODE (specifically, "Such pages must still be notable, and contain out-of-universe context, and not merely be a list of episode titles or cast and crew: Wikipedia is not a directory.") Most information within article falls under WP:ALS, since episode air dates, contestant notes, and team scores are unsourced.
This is not a television series with fictional plot synopses that is appropriate to be chronicled in an article, and the specific details of results from a television game show episode do not meet WP:GNG.
Ample precedent that WP:UNSOURCED/ WP:LISTCRUFT aggregate statistics of episode, individual game and tournament results for game show episodes do not meet WP:GNG/ WP:EPISODE are discussed in similar AFDs, such as:
I am also nominating the following related pages because pages detailing season statistics for Only Connect seasons 2 through 10 are all similar and also fail WP guidelines discussed above:
AldezD ( talk) 19:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 06:54, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Cyclopia has found sources and the article is being expanded upon. Withdrawn by nominator. – S. Rich ( talk) 15:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Amazingly, this completely unreferenced article has been classed as B-class. But it does not even have an External links section which might add some uummppfftt to the article. WP:TNT and see if there is anything worth putting together afterwards. – S. Rich ( talk) 07:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted ( CSD A7) by Bbb23. ( non-admins closure) Jim Carter (from public cyber) 12:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Has had a deletion tag go up a few times but the person keeps on removing it. I say this should be deleted as there are no refs, could be an important person as the producing of a song is pretty big, but this seems iffy. Wgolf ( talk) 00:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Not seeing evidence that the subject of this BLP meets GNG or WP:PROF nor do I believe being the Inaugural Director of the Frederick Douglass Distinguished Scholars Program at American University is in itself notable. J04n( talk page) 23:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I have found no indication of coverage in reliable, independent sources for this book. A Google search turned up no usable sources. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Since Afds are not a vote, I'm closing this in favor of the side that has made the most solid arguments. Mark Arsten ( talk) 23:42, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm no expert in organised crime, but while there's some substance to it i.e. historical figures like Asiong Salonga, this apparently reeks of an elaborate hoax, not to mention that similar articles have been deleted before for the same reasons. Blake Gripling ( talk) 23:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 01:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Flagged this article for deletion because it fails to meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. This is a clear case of self-promotion as the page was created by a username that is an anagram of Mr. Stolyarov's full name.
Anonymous user 216.59.118.42 nominated this article for deletion on 20:36, 26 August 2014, for the following reason:
"Flagged this article for deletion because it fails to meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. This is a clear case of self-promotion as the page was created by a username that is an anagram of Mr. Stolyarov's full name."
Bird in the sun ( talk) 22:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
References
I object in principle to an AFD started by someone on behalf of a nonregistered user, there is no way around this, because unregistered users cannot create pages, which is necessary to start an AfD discussion (see WP:AFDHOWTO), and I believe it is policy of some sort (not necessarily WP:POLICY) that we should not force people to create accounts if they do not wish to. We do our best to notify the unregistered user that a nomination has been made, either on WT:AfD if they requested there (as was in this case) or on their talk page if they did elsewhere. Ansh 666 20:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Nothing has changed since the last AFD, which was closed as keep without quorum. Subject is not notable because of his association with Ross Perot, nor as a painter. Almost all claims in the article are unverifiable. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete a7 (nonnotable), g11 (self-promotion), WP:SNOW. See my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr sol adoni. NawlinWiki ( talk) 20:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Non- notable computer language. No citation here of independent WP:reliable sources, and virtually no pertinent hits in a verbatim Google search. Previously PRODded but article's creator unPRODded it. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 18:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Drprinceton ( talk) 19:25, 26 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton
Dr. Adoni is the figure behind HelixQ. His 30Mod Prime theory in 1995 is now known to be th fastest Prime Algorithm due to bench mark tests in PyPrimes. Wiki Needs a page on Dr. Adoni, HelixQ and his 8 Prime Spirals. So far one Russian is trying to keep the info off of Wiki, and he is not qualified to judge such major new prime work. The 30Mod Prime algorithm predates the sieve of Atkin a 60Mod prime theory also discussed by Dr. Adoni years before and his 90Mod work is relevant as well.
Drprinceton ( talk) 19:25, 26 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton
The result was Speedy delete, WP:SPAM and WP:SNOW. Author's argument is "the world is conspiring against me to keep me and my theory from becoming known". That won't work here. NawlinWiki ( talk) 20:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Because the article makes him sound significant, I'm not speedying this, but I can't find evidence of notability for this living person. Few Google hits, no Google Scholar hits, and the word "ennisa" itself returns only 208 hits in a Google search, with none that I can see in a quick scan giving the impression of being an organization that publishes papers on mathematical topics. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 18:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
This editor is trying to supress information about Dr Adoni and his 8 Prime Spirals released in 1995. Since then his 30Mod prime work was used by Sieve of Atkin 60mod work. Dr. Adoni is well known since he has authored many books and there are many news articles on him. The person trying to delete this page which is needed due to the 8 prime spiral of Dr. Adoni and his HelixQ work as well, is a lone Russian editor trying to keep the world ignorant of the major prime discoveries of Dr. Adoni. PyPrimes was used to verify how significant the 8 prime spirals are, since they out performed all prime algorithms tested included wheel factorization and seive of Eratosthenes. So the page is needed as a reference to the work of Dr. Adoni, that being his 1995 paper the Ennisa Formula in which 30mod, 60mod and 90mod prime algorithms were discussed. Since that work 60mod prime algorithm work of Atkin has been accepted as a major advance in primality, even though it was really discovered almost 10 years earlier. There are many usenet debates from the 1990's over how important this discovery was. Now 20 years later with PyPrimes and the sieve of Atkin being found to be significant work, the original work of Dr Adoni should be cited properly at Wiki. To ignore his 1995 work that is well documented in Usenet from the 1990's would be a gross violation of acknowledging the real discover of 30mod, 60mod and 90mod prime theory. Drprinceton ( talk) 19:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton
Drprinceton, commenting after close with a statement starting with "Wiki nazis" isn't really conducive to changing anybody's mind about speedy deleting this. If you object to the close, please take it to
Deletion review. In the meantime, this is being confined as it's wholly immaterial to the nomination above, which is closed.
Nate • (
chatter)
00:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
|
---|
Drprinceton ( talk) 00:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton Wiki nazis have already deleted the 3 articles, it's why most in Academia consider wiki to be a JOKE. The original article was ocmpletely neutral despite what some mod happy person believes. The fact wiki deleted all 3 articles shows how slanted wiki is. FACTS 2012 prime spirals were PROVEN in a test by PyPrimes part of the Python Project to be faster than all known prime algorithms, that's MAJOR NEWS and the 8 Prime Spirals are what this new algorithm is called. Now there is some minor debate about who theorized the 30Mod Prime Spirals and besides 30Mod prime spirals being front and center in PyPrimes a GITHUB project that an real expert forum on mathematics compared to wiki, the work done in PyPrimes testing the sieve of Eratosthenes (a wiki article) and prime wheel factorization (a wiki article) all got beaten in speed by 8 PRIME SPIRALS. THAT IS MAJOR MATHEMATICS NEWS Now the 60Mod prime algorithm known as sieve of Atkin has a wiki page too, so Python the computer language project that test the prime algorithms, the ancient sieve of Eratosthenes, sieve of Atkins, prime wheel factorization all have WIKI PAGES, yet the new kid on the block that BEAT THEM ALL and the test was done at GITHUB the top site for such open academic evaluations IMO, says 8 Prime Spirals or 30Mod prime algorithm IS THE KING OF THE HILL in creating primes. It beat all the algorithms you have pages on. Yet the new fast algorithm you want to ignore. PyPrimes used GITHUB to verify the results. Anyone can download PyPrimes and test all the prime algorithms YOU HAVE PAGES ON, and they all lose compared to 8 PRIME SPIRALS yet this site (wiki) is now deleting any mention of the 8 Prime Spirals, the person who created it in 1995 and his new project a new computer language using his now proven math theories. So GITHUB was cited, Python is a major wiki page, wheel factorization is a major wiki page, sieve of Eratosthenes is a major wiki page and even the sieve of Atkin all have pages. YOU SEE WHAT A JOKE WIKI IS deleting the proven fastest algrithm that people are now SEARCHING FOR INFO ON. Anyone can see the original article it was neutral, yet wiki allowed it to be deleted. /info/en/?search=8_prime_spirals Now there is controvsey over the claims to who discovered 30Mod prime theory, and Usenet has numerous of posts showing Dr. Adoni was discussing 30Mod, 60Mod and 90Mod prime algorithms. SO IT IS HIS WORK. Yet in 2004 Atkin comes along and now you have a page about his 60Mod theory, guess what 60Mod prime theory and 30Mod and 90Mod were all discussed in the 1990's in usenet due to DR ADONI's work. Now do any of you see how foolish wiki looks deleting the page. So does a test PROVING the significance of 30Mod prime algorithm being fastest than all known prime algorithms that all have wiki pages warrant a page for the KING OF PRIMES ALGORITHMS? YES IT DOES For anyone to say test results subject to peer review by academics on GITHUB is not a trusted source look foolish. SO THE CITE TO THE TESTS on GITHUB via PYPRIMES is defacto proof of a neutral source to make the claims. OR DO NONE OF YOU GET THAT? GITHUB is the neutral source CITED as proof 8 Prime Spirals are now KING OF THE HILL in primality, and that is NEWS WORTHY. Since wiki has so much stuff on the slower primes to not have a page on the 8 Prime Spirals citing GITHUB and PYPRIMES as proof it is real, is a JOKE. Anyway, I'll just email the Adoni group what this site is doing and how they think I'm him, or an assoicate, so they can laugh at WIKI and maybe put notice on their network to the moronic statments made here. PUT THE PAGE BACK a. The cite to GITHUB and PYPRIMES open source test is PROOF of the claims, anyone can download Python and PyPrimes and test all the algorithms YOU HAVE PAGES ON and guess what Einsteins, all your wiki page algorithms LOSE to the Prime Spirals. b. Sieve of Atkins uses 60Mod prime theory, guess what Dr. Adoni had it in his work on 30Mod prime TEN YEARS EARLIER, so his work is connected to that as well. C. Prime Wheel Factorization a wiki page, it lost to the Adoni Prime Spirals too, yet you think wiki should not discuss prime spiral theory? D. Sieve of Eratosthenes, 2300 years old now and the first prime algorithm to out perform it, THE ADONI PRIME SPIRALS Now the article noted Atkins is using work that was public for almost 10 years. The article noted an ERROR in calling the prime spirals croft spirals since Steven Croft claimed to have discovered them in 2010. Yet the fact is Usenet has the discussion on 30Mod, 60Mod and 90Mod prime theory in the 1990's way before Atkin or Croft made any claims to them. Anyway, to see sledge hammer nazi level censorship at wiki shows why WIKI IS A JOKE to academics. For this topic to say GITHUB is not a major cite is a JOKE. For this topic to say a new prime algorithm that has beaten all the prime algorithms listed on Wiki is a JOKE as to the topic not being relevant. PUT THE PAGE BACK /info/en/?search=8_prime_spirals Drprinceton ( talk) 00:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton |
The result was speedy delete as hoax. How did this survive for three years? Being an orphan may be one reason. Now preserved for your delight at Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Pilot Season (film). — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 14:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Feels definitely like a hoax to me. Freshh! ( talk) 18:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G4 was declined without a clear reason as to why being provided. Reasons from the last afd still apply. He has still not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:51, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
*Delete - Fails
WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a
fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy
GNG.
Fenix down (
talk)
12:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
:Fully Agree with you that he is not notable at the moment hence did not vote keep and only on the bench
till now.
Pharaoh of the Wizards (
talk)
18:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 03:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010, lets make a decision either way. Unreferenced, I don't believe it has lasting notability Gbawden ( talk) 12:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Original concern was that the subject has not competed at a level of cricket considered notable by WP:CRIN, but the PROD was removed with the rationale that he "may not have played First-class, List A or T20 matches till now. But he has already played Youth ODI matches. He is also in Nepal's squad for 2014 Asian Games and Nepal have recently been awarded T20I status. So the days are not so far when Ramnaresh will be playing those matches as well. So I believe it's not important to delete the article right now. Have patience!" But the article still fails WP:CRIN. Ytfc23 ( talk) 11:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was wrong venue - you need Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion ( Non-admin closure. St★lwart 111 13:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Misleading Page title as the page where is directed is never called "Mass Rail Transit" PhilippineRevolution ( talk) 10:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was wrong venue - you need Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion ( Non-admin closure. St★lwart 111 13:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Misleading title causing confusion to readers as all pages linking to this page are now fixed and directed to the corrected page PhilippineRevolution ( talk) 10:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7 at author's request. JohnCD ( talk) 21:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Seems promotional, unreferenced and a most likely is non-notable. NickGibson3900 Talk Sign my Guestbook Contributions 09:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
This was a once off match, believe it fails WP:SPORTSEVENT Gbawden ( talk) 06:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
I stand by my prod rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (organizations) requirement." Deprodded by creator "Object to deletion because Kopernik (organization) is a registered NPO in the US and had successful ongoing activities for the past 4 years". I am afraid this is simply not sufficient defense in light of the cited policies. PS. It's a shame that the creator was not trying to save valuable encyclopedic images showing that NGO's work in developing countries ( commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Waterfilters.jpg and others). PPS. See related AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewa Wojkowska. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Missing notability according to the notability guidelines, this artcile obviously serves only self promotional purpose. This person has actually done nothing notable. Except one fanbook about the Three Investigators and one satirical audiobook he did with his brother all his books are self published by his own organisation which lacks in notability also, no medial coverage about him, we had the fun with him and the 60 sockpuppets around him and his organisation in the german wikipedia before the deletion of both articles because of no notability. Seader ( talk) 04:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:48, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Missing notability according to the notability criteria, this article obviously serves self promotional purpose. This organisation has done nothing notable and I cant see any of the criterias for notability fullfilled. Since it offers commercial oriented consulting and advertising services to small number newspapers (for this actions there is also no independent source given) and is a snall self publisher ( publishing only its own books) it is to be seen as a commercial organisation. No widespread medial coverage about it ( in the last 20 years around 20 journalistic articles where it gets mentioned but only menioned). There is no office, it is a mailbox organisation without an office and only run by the founder Björn Akstinat himself and according to his saying supported by 10 volunters somewhere in germany (for which there is also no independent source), from his own or parents home (this is where the address given by the IMH leads to), where from he runs also his second organsiation for german music. Also for the so-called members of the IMH workgroup there is no independent and reliable source given. The data this IMH gives as results of their research is the result of Björn Akstinat himself using Google how he himself admits in an interviev published at the 25/06/2014 in a blog. We had already the fun with the company spam of 60 sockpuppets around this organisation in the german wikipedia before the deletion of this article since of missing notability.
Is a private mailbox organisation which is run by one person from his own or his parents home with no independent medial coverage about its specific actions or work really notable for the Wikipedia. I doubt that. Seader ( talk) 03:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Seems to fail Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 13:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
The range is not notable, as virtually every major military installation has a shooting range, and there is nothing special about this one. Yes, there are citations about it out there, but that does not mean that this establishes notability. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 05:51, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by admin RHaworth as copyright infringement ( non-admin closure). St★lwart 111 09:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
I AFD'ed this article 3.5 years ago, with the nom meeting with no consensus and only two participants. Possible academic notability, but serious conflict of interest concerns with both the creator of the article (see the first AfD) and with the editor responsible for most of the changes since then, User:Mguetl. A search for Guetl on the site brings up a Martina Guetl in management of the IDIAP Research Institute—which also conveniently has its own article, heavily edited by Ms. Guetl.
As to the article itself, there are no external references. Large chunks of text have been lifted from the IM2 website (compare the third paragraph in the second section with this page from the site). Additionally, the text itself is rather promotional in nature ("It is a unique program combining state-of-art technologies and cutting edge research..."). Raymie ( t • c) 05:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Number 5 7 12:00, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Best known as a frontman from a non notable band ( afd). Lacks coverage in reliable sources. Prod removed without comment. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
I disagree with user Duffbeerforme with their claim of Seven Factor in no notable and should be deleted for "being best known as front man for non notable band". 1st, the band being reffered to as Non Notable, was notable. their wiki page was deleted due to act of vandalism...this entire proposal to delete seems to be based off of that one aspect of an obviously multi level career. 2nd. Seven Factor was also associated with notable bands such as Crossbreed ( artemis records) and 16VOLT ( METROPOLIS RECORDS) Links to these bands are on the wiki page. 3rd. Seven Factor is the resident engineer at the world famous KDS STUDIOS in Orlando Florida,Formally transcon studios which launched such bands as NSYNC and the backstreet boys. Eminem has done his last 3 albums in this studio. His clients in this studio include some of the top selling artists on the billboard charts past and present. 4th. As a solo artists he has done remixes for notable bands Such as Tweaker, and Psyclon Nine.. and has a FACEBOOK VERIFIED Facebook page of just under 60,000 followers. 5th.As a producer and engineer he works closely and collaborates on projects with grammy and platinum sales award winning artists such as Chris Vrenna( Nine Inch Nails. Marilyn Manson, Knarles Barkley, Tweaker,) and Sara Lee Lucas( original Drummer for Marilyn Manson) 5th. As a multi media artists Seven Factor has done Video woe for such Notable bands as KMFDM, and CombiChrist... as well as mobile apps on the iTunes and android platform for Combichrist. It is obvious that Seven Factor has a long lasting, and very well established career in the music industry in many aspects of the filed , with many different bands .. not just 1 that was mistakenly deemed " not notable" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.251.218 ( talk) 04:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
its not "inherited" but according to wiki guidelines he meets the requirements for being involved in projects with "Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians" - thats taken directly from the guideline.. perhaps you did not read the entire article and are focused only on one part. your incorrect statements lead me to believe that perhaps you did not notice he was involved in multiple notable bands.. and has worked on projects with multiple other notable musicians and producers like himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.251.218 ( talk) 16:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Finngall, Why do you think this should be deleted. You mentioned the Human Factors Lab AFD.. were you apart of that conversation?. I feel perhaps you are ignoring the examples shown that Seven Factor meets the Notability guideline requirements and are basing your "delete" comment on that previous Human Factors Lab page.. when its only slightly related to this.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:10F8:7FD9:D69A:20FF:FE61:9DF5 ( talk) 20:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Keep meets the following criteria for musicians as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MUSIC#Others. 4.Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country Example. Toured with KMFDM as support. here is one example of the extensive coverage of that north america tour http://www.steadymagazine.com/news/news-kmfdm-tour-north-america-this-august/ 6.Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles Seven Factor is currently working directly with members of KMFDM, Marilyn Manson, And Nine INch Nails — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:10F8:7FD9:D69A:20FF:FE61:9DF5 ( talk) 21:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Once again duffbeer is incorrect with his statements Was a member of 2 listed notable acts. Crossbreed ( Artemis records) and 16volt ( metropolis records) also Engineer/producer on one of crossbreeds Albums. As far as the "notability not inherited" statement. The guideline states at least 2 notable members involved in project. So listed notable members other than himself involved on projects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.251.218 ( talk) 06:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
That's your opinion mr duffbeer. The facts however are all listed and have sources showing it meets the notability guidelines. Seven factor has been a member of multiple notable bands as a musician. Has worked on many notable projects as a music producer. And has worked directly with other notable musicians and producers on those projects. He is a resident is house Engibeer in a notable recording studio with over 200k RIAA sales. There have been multiple examples of why this page should be kept. However only 1 is needed. Correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.251.218 ( talk) 06:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Duffbeer was a part of the Discussion to delete Human Factors Lab. . His nomination to delete this thread is no coincidence. he is basing his motives for wanting this page deleted almost Entirely on the notability of Human Factors Lab as decided by that dsicussion, and not taking into full account the other aspects that should be taken into consideration when deciding if Seven Factor should be kept or not — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:10F8:7FD9:D69A:20FF:FE61:9DF5 ( talk) 03:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Addressing you previous post MrDuffBeer... lies and conspiracy is a strong words..lets take a step back from what appears to be an emotionally driven pursuit to have this page delted, and address the exact facts
Human Factors Lab -there was a call for deletion of the HFL page was because a user called "Bringthemdown" requested it.. this user was a former band member and created this account for the soul purpose of vandalizing the Human Factors Lab account. There was an extremely long deletion conversation about it. a large majority was made of of current band members voting to keep it, and previous band members voting to delete it. However there were a few people involved that were just regular wiki users that also voted to keep it.. in the end these votes were ignored, and Human Factors Lab was deemed not notable by wiki standards despite being a signed band 14 MAJOR US and Canadian tours under their belt and 8 albums releases , .. . That decision was made.. nothing we can do about that . So if thats your reason for saying Seven Factor is not notable because he was a member of that band. Ok.. We will give you that one. so lets put that aspect behind us now and focuss on the other elements.
-Seven Factor as a solo musician and producer has been Facebook verified with a verified Facebook fan base of just under 60 thousand fans. he is currently working on a studio album under that name. Other studio members of this ensemble include Chris Vrenna of Nine Inch Nails and Mariln Manson fame. And Steve White of KMFDM fame. So in this sense, Seven Factor is indeed an ensemble, with at least 2 notable members as per wiki guidelines
-Crossbreed. Seven Factor was the engineer/producer on the crossbreed New Slave Nation EP During this time frame he was also 1 of 2 keyboardists. you are correct, he is not credited on the crossbreed wiki site.. however is credited on the actual CD. Maybe someone reading this has a copy. I do not
-16VOLT. Like Many industrial bands 16volt is lead by 1 main person Eric Powel.. Other examples of this include Nine Inch Nail( trent Reznor) , KMFDM, ( Sascha), and Minitry( al jourgensen). .. 16volt by design is a band signed to Metropolis records as 1 person. It is considered a "super group" Eric Powel, the main driving force and only permanent member of that band, recruits other well known musicians in the Genera to perform when he tours. This was the case in the 2008 Denial Hwy tour, Featuring Seven Factor.. credited in a few of the MANY press released as S3ven as you pointed out. There are literally dozens of examples of reviews, announcements , ect from this tour mentioning Seven Factor as being a part of this band. if you would like i would be happy to ink them all, or feel free to google them yourself. Please let me know i you need me to link all of them and i will. The Fact that he was a "touring member" should not make him any less notable considering that 1. that is the nature of that band, and 2. he was chosen to be a part of it because he was considered notable by industrial music fans that attend 16volt shows.
Seven Factor is a music producer and musician. being a music producer, he works on many music projects with many well known musicians. We seem to have covered his own personal music career fairly well, but what are the guidelines concerning , albums, producers or audio engineers?....there are many well known engineers that are considered notable, but have never played in a "notable"band or are themselves considered an ensemble but are still vital parts of the recording process, and are considered notable in the music industry. Seven Factor is a resident producer at KDS music studio. This is one of the major recording studios in the country responsible for well over 200 million certified RIAA sales. Lets look at what that means. The People at one of the largest studios in the WOLRD , with some of the biggest artists in the industry ( Rhianna, Eminem, Dr Dre, Puff Daddy, Brittany Spears,NSync. backstreet boys)felt that Seven Factor was notable enough as a producer not just to invite him to work in this legendary facility, but to give him his own keys to the entire building, and his own office. As im sure you know.. Office space in facilities like this are not just given out, and are a rare thing to see in this industry.. other examples would be Pharrel has a simular office at south beach studios in Miami, fl . I think this speak volumes alone as to Seven Factors notability, however while at this studio he is working as a producer and engineer on a number the albums recording a number of major label artists. he is also working very closely,in an ensemble environment with members of Nine Inch Nails, Marilyn Manson, and KMFDM , they write songs together, for varies projects. Again.. I think that it should be considered the caliber of artists we are talking about. Now, it is obvious these artists are MORE notable than Seven Factor.. and with the amount of platinum albums and Grammies those artists have, it is not likely they would work with Seven Factor over the span of a few years of they did not view him as a peer in their industry
Regarding your claim of people lying, by saying it was an act of vandalism. It is easy to se by looking at the edit history of the HUman Factors Lab wiki page that it had been under attack of vandalism for a short time before the deletion request was put in. Do you need a link to show this as well? This was already addressed in the opening statement of this edit what took place there.
your "another lie" post. regarding touring Seven Factor was on a 45 date US/Canadian tour with KMFDM, , .. .. This was supported by Metrolpis Records, and there was coverage of the tour national by almost every major news outlet from rolling stone to the gauntlet as well as on a local level in every city news paper the tour visited. If you want to google KMFDM tour 2011 i am sure you will see dozens of examples of this. Seven Factor was an active member of this tour from its inception and represented on every flier and news coverage of the tour under the band name Human Factors Labin that same year he was involved in a 30 day tour with the band Mushroomhead .. 1 of 4 tours he had done with that band.If you are not familaru with Mushroomhead they just got off the recent mayhem tour which played to about 20K people a night, along side bands like Korn, and trivium. These tours were done under the name Human Factors Lab and are listed on each bands own wiki page. Listing Human Factors Lab
in closing, i strongly feel that duffbeer is basing his vote to delete based soley off of the Human Factors Lab deletion that took place.. in his mind.. If Human Factors Lab was deleted then Seven Factor must be deleted as well... in his mind he feels they are one in the same.. Lets be very clear that they are NOT the same. Seven Factor was the driving force behind Human Factors Lab... Just like Gene Simmons is the Driving force behind Kiss and Trent Reznor is the Driving force behind Nine Inch Nails......both examples have extensive careers outside of these bands.. Seven Factor is no different. I ask that the person making the desicion on this page please take this into consideration and make a fair decision based off of what it present here, not off of a previous thread — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:10F8:7FD9:D69A:20FF:FE61:9DF5 ( talk) 02:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I think the subject lacks the sufficient notability for actors. Only one useful references is presented, which indicate little notability. Article suffers from serious WP:COI and is the work of WP:SPA's, mainly here to promote Ravindra Prabhat and their family. The article creator and other main contributor are perhaps related to the subject. The author of the only useful reference is also part of this circle of SPA's.Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 01:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 17:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Wikpedia is not a Tv guide ( WP:NOTTVGUIDE). This article is totally unsourced, and I can't find any reliable sources with significant coverage to prove the wp:Notability. Vanjagenije ( talk) 17:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I created this article back in September of 2009 thinking that it was notable enough for Wikipedia. The problem with the article is that I feel it just doesn't meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia. It relies mostly on a primary source, with only a secondary source supporting it. I did another search to see if I could come up with any new sources that might better establish the notability of this company, but I was not able to find anything. Though it has been consistently ranked as a Top 100 Independant pizza chain (supported by the secondary source), I don't feel this is enough to pass WP:GNG. ArcAngel (talk) ) 07:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Very confusing article, it appears he does not meet WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 11:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Philg88 ♦ talk 06:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that he meets WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 07:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is no consensus to delete after two relistings. While I believe notability in this case is borderline, there are valid arguments from both keep/delete !voters. However neither side has established consensus for an alternative outcome. Philg88 ♦ talk 08:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources to establish notability. Nor does the article itself give a reason for notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS.
The article was previously PROD but the tag was removed by James500 with the comment, "Wikipedia is a gazateer. You are meant to look for sources with a search engine. Is in Google Maps."
To counter this I need point out that Wikipedia is not a gazetteer (geographical dictionary or directory used in conjunction with a map): see WP:NOTDIR. Nor is it a tourist guidebook: see WP:NOTGUIDE. The sister project, Wikivoyage, would be a better home for this content though I suspect that this road is too insignificant and lacking interest for Wikivoyage too.
It is insufficient to say that sources exist: see WP:LOTSOFSOURCES. You should name sources to prove notability. Before PROD a search was done. Before the AfD another search was done. This road is only mentioned as an address for various buildings or traffic ordinances. No source found gave any information about the road itself.
The existence of this road in Google Maps is irrelevant. Every road in the world seems to be in Google Maps: see Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability. Coverage in Google Maps does not prove notability. Rincewind42 ( talk) 08:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Delete non notable neologism [ [14]] Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 08:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. (Thanks Cavarrone for your improvements). ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 16:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
This article has been on Wikipedia since August, 2009 with hardly any marked improvement in it. In fact, there have been just 10 edits on this article in its lifetime. A search for sources to establish notability turned up nothing that I could determine. ArcAngel (talk) ) 03:58, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 17:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable casualty of the Cold War. We may want to consider DeBruin and this Cheney (not Dick) at the same time; but I figure deal with this one first. Orange Mike | Talk 00:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Article deleted per consensus but content has been merged into Labia pride as requested by 3 !voters Philg88 ♦ talk 06:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 20:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is no doubt that this article fails GNG, which leaves EricEnfermero's argument based on WP:AUTHOR. Unfortunately, it was not clear to me on what basis WP:AUTHOR is supposed to apply (ie, which of the bullet points) so not surprisingly there was no clear rebuttal of this argument either. However, I note that the book in question gets a decent number of citation. As Lesser Cartographies commented, an article about the book may be a better option. There was no clear consensus for this either, but it remains an option for future editor discussion. In the meantime, I am retaining the material in this article per WP:PRESERVE Spinning Spark 13:41, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
I could not establish that he meets WP:PROF or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 17:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Appears WP:TOOSOON at best. Does not seem to meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 16:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nelliyode Vasudevan Namboodiri. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
BLP that has been unsourced for over 6 years. No significant coverage found. Michig ( talk) 08:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of streets and roads in Hong Kong. (Non-admin closure.)-- 180.172.239.231 ( talk) 12:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS.
The article was previously PROD but the tag was removed by James500 with the comment, "Wikiped'ia is a gazateer. You are meant to look for sources with a search engine. Is in Google Maps. Plausible redirect."
To counter this I need point out that Wikipedia is |not a gazetteer (geographical dictionary or directory used in conjunction with a map): see WP:NOTDIR. Nor is it a tourist guidebook: see WP:NOTGUIDE. The sister project, Wikivoyage, would be a better home for this content.
It is insufficient to say that sources exist: see WP:LOTSOFSOURCES. You should name sources to prove notability. Before PROD a search was done. Before the AfD another search was done. This road is only mentioned as an address for various buildings or traffic ordinances. No source found gave any information about the road itself.
The existence of this road in Google Maps is irrelevant. Every road in the world seems to be in Google Maps: see Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability. Coverage in Google Maps does not prove notability. Rincewind42 ( talk) 08:05, 10 August 2014 (UTC) Rincewind42 ( talk) 08:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 17:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Fails notability. Created by someone with WP:COI. No significant coverage found in independent reliable sources. No attempt to provide evidence of notability. No external sourcing - in fact, relies entirely on its own website. SmileBlueJay97 talk 10:35, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. all Spinning Spark 22:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
WP:LISTCRUFT article showing by-episode team scores, game results and notes about contestants appearing on each episode of Only Connect. Article does not contain information that meets guidelines in WP:EPISODE (specifically, "Such pages must still be notable, and contain out-of-universe context, and not merely be a list of episode titles or cast and crew: Wikipedia is not a directory.") Most information within article falls under WP:ALS, since episode air dates, contestant notes, and team scores are unsourced.
This is not a television series with fictional plot synopses that is appropriate to be chronicled in an article, and the specific details of results from a television game show episode do not meet WP:GNG.
Ample precedent that WP:UNSOURCED/ WP:LISTCRUFT aggregate statistics of episode, individual game and tournament results for game show episodes do not meet WP:GNG/ WP:EPISODE are discussed in similar AFDs, such as:
I am also nominating the following related pages because pages detailing season statistics for Only Connect seasons 2 through 10 are all similar and also fail WP guidelines discussed above:
AldezD ( talk) 19:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 06:54, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Cyclopia has found sources and the article is being expanded upon. Withdrawn by nominator. – S. Rich ( talk) 15:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Amazingly, this completely unreferenced article has been classed as B-class. But it does not even have an External links section which might add some uummppfftt to the article. WP:TNT and see if there is anything worth putting together afterwards. – S. Rich ( talk) 07:19, 18 August 2014 (UTC)