Template:Centralized discussion
This page is a
soft redirect.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was make redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:53, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This was tagged for speedy deletion as vanity, but it doesn't fit any criteria IMO. What happens to surnames these days? Move to wiktionary maybe. Kappa 00:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:22, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Obvious vanity.— Trevor Caira 00:18, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:23, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement, vanity article, attempt at googlebombing ethiotrans.com. Along with the creation of this article, a paragraph was added to Amharic language, informing us that "You can see the list of languages what Ethiotrans is offering by going its web site http://www.ethiotrans.com". — mark ✎ 00:44, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:24, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable. "Not known for any major achievement." I'd say Userfy but he wasn't logged in when he made the page. Nateji77 01:17, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge all of these starships with
List of Starfleet ship classes.
Sjakkalle 08:26, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
A page for a Star Trek starship class that never appeared on screen and was never even mentioned in any episode. AlistairMcMillan 01:29, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (are we just going to take this deletion lying down? er, sorry).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:30, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Dictionary definition, should be moved to wiki dictionary if it is not already there -- B.d.mills ( Talk) 01:30, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP, pending rewrite.
Golbez 01:26, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be a politician of no great import in Canada. Notability is borderline. Kelly Martin 01:31, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
I have now listed it at Copyright problems and put a copyvio template on it, as should have been done when the copyvio was first discovered. A new version can be written at Don Plett/Temp. Rick K 04:58, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Transwikied by Dmcdevit.
Golbez 01:28, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Dictionary definition - redirect to Wiktionary - Tom Barnwell
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedied.
Golbez 01:28, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
vanity page -- B.d.mills ( Talk) 02:01, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedied.
Golbez 01:28, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
This article is about a 'secret' organization. Since secret organizations can not be verified they are generally considered non-encyclopedic. Google hits=0 for most of the material (the acronym B.D.C. has several unrelated meanings), I tried several forms without success. Page was created by an anon and this is the IP's only edit. This may be a hoax. Should be deleted if it can't be verified. RJFJR 02:13, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:28, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable kookery. Let's not all make fun of the crazy kid, now. - Sean Curtin 02:16, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:29, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Original research, not encyclopedic. The term "banana wolfing" returns zero hits on google. There is little scientific evidence to support most of the article's claims, except for the statement "Bananas, being high in tryptophan, have the potential of being a relaxant." Thus, the rest of the article is original research. Since the tryptophan content of bananas is already mentioned in the tryptophan article, this article should be deleted. - Jersyko 02:34, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedied.
Golbez 01:29, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Hilarious. Not only is the title POV, but the list deserves a place on the list of shortest articles (entire text was "Spevack"). This either needs retitling and greatly extending, or getting rid of (and since we already have various lists of surnames by nationality, I'd favour the latter). Grutness... wha? 03:13, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was
Patent nonsense. No hits in google. Samw 03:28, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:34, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
2005 British parliamentary candidate who came in 4th with 4.3% of the vote. The constituency itself was only notable in that the Labour majority was reduced, and the victor seems to be an unordinary MP. Delete. NatusRoma 03:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:30, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
looks to me like a vanity page for his own webpage - delete -- Mariocki TALK 04:14, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:39, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Bandcruft. Notability not established in article. Kelly Martin 04:19, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:31, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Not notable. DJ Clayworth 04:27, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:41, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
tyrenga shows zero google hits and duplicates the Beast of Exmoor article - Merge and redirect with Beast of Exmoor -- Mariocki TALK 04:32, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Beast of Exmoor is outdated and presents this animal as a mythical beast. Photos prove otherwise and a new Zoo-ological name is given to support this. Zero google hits mean absolutely nothing. Try looking up "Bexmoor Cat" which was published in the British tabloids- no hits as well. Merge and redirect Beast of Exmoor article to Tyrenga
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:32, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
vanity band page. "Burning Wench" gets exactly 3 Google hits — Wahoofive ( talk) 04:35, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:35, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
199 google results, copyvio, started by vandal. Lotsofissues 04:39, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Golbez 01:34, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Bob Hayden, chief of an amateur league. 100 hits for name with USA hockey, I'm grouping together because the pages are both started by same vandal. Lotsofissues 04:43, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 00:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Seeming hoax or neologism. Of the 63 Google hits, only a handful are for this meaning. — Wahoofive ( talk) 04:42, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:35, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Metal/punk is a music genre combining metal and punk. Nothing links here. Let's delete it before anything does.— Wahoofive ( talk) 04:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete. I tried to find something appropriate to propose a redirect, such as hardcore punk, Metalcore, or Grunge, but nothing seemed particularly appropriate. Also, the article asserts that punk and metal are seemingly disparate, yet from a brief glance at the punk pages, it does not seeem like that would be true, so I call the accuracy of the article into question as well. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (already transwikied).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:41, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Partial VfD, didn't see where it originated. Article is currently flagged for transwiki. Abstain. R adiant _* 17:39, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:36, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Bandity. "Purple koosh" +Barkmeier gets zero Google hits. Rick K 05:14, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. However, Sherurcij, this wouldn't have happened if you hadn't saved a sub-sub-stub. You ARE allowed to make a full article before hitting Save. --
Golbez 01:37, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Not notable, little useful content -- B.d.mills ( Talk)
Yeah, how about we wait till I actually add content, seeing as how the page was added about 3 minutes ago? The whole purpose of a stub is to give the very minimum of detail until you, or somebody else, has time to add more.
-- Sherurcij 05:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Comment. Sherurcij, I'd like to offer you a friendly encouragement to strive for politeness. I'm sure that calmly explaining here on the Vfd talk page that you will be imminently adding to the article will provide adequate reason for a stay on deletion. You've been on Wikipedia a good while now, and it looks like you've been working hard to make improvements during that time, so well done. I look forward to seeing this article improve in the near future. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (transwikied already).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:43, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Dicdef— Wahoofive ( talk) 05:41, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:38, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
My hoaxometer is blinking... I have not been able to verify this. Can anyone else? I would suggest redirecting this title to Jeff Koons, as it is not an entirely improbable misspelling. Uppland 06:23, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:41, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Band vanity -- Longhair | Talk 08:13, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:54, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Short, unclear. Maybe it should be a stub, maybe it should be cleaned up. -- BradBeattie 12:49, 4 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Should be improved, but NOT deleted. It is a valid reference to a major european party and its history. -- Yafuetodo
It should be improved but we need a GFDL-friendly picture. -- Error 23:56, 8 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Comment: this was nominated on May 5, but not added to the vfd page until now - I'm adding it to today's page to give it full time for discussion. sjorford →•← 08:25, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:58, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Requesting deletion, because Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base (genealogical entries) -- Eponymous Coward 08:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was transwiki.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:50, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Given that this article is written entirely in a non-encyclopedic format about a topic that is non-encyclopedic, I recommend this article for deletion. See What Wikipedia is Not, subsection "Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base." - Barfooz 09:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 16:01, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Advertisement for a company with an annual turnover of 14.2 Million €. If the noteability can't be established and the language toned down a lot, Delete. -- S.K. 11:36, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:42, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be nothing more than a jab at World of Warcraft. Orange Goblin 11:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 16:04, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Neologism, 12 google hits. Thue | talk 11:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. (In the end the debate was about whether to merge or to keep, the keepers are in the majority)
Sjakkalle 12:45, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:42, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
227 google hits for "Fractal jack" does not make them a notable band. I don't think we need an article on every band in existance. Perhaps an article on "Thrash metal bands of Scotland" or something could at least tie them into one article. -- Silversmith 16:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:43, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Probable nonsense, it's not in my rather large OED, answers.com dictionary or my (admittedly old edition second hand) medical dictionary, and gets 47 google results, of which several are wikipedia+mirrors and none appear to be verifiable and look a lot like jokes to me. Joe D (t) 16:36, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Unable to userfy.
Golbez 01:45, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Not notable. (What sport is this, anyway?) Deb 17:12, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect
A misspelling of Georgiana Rizk. 500LL 17:17, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect done. The content was identical. A suspicion of copying from somewhere else. Mikkalai 20:33, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:48, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Does not contain any info that is not in the main Flickerstick article, and does not link to any other pages
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete, already transwikied.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:19, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Not a disambiguation page. I believe this material was decided to appropriate for Wiktionary. Rmhermen 17:52, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete, already transwikied.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:18, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Not a disambiguation page. I believe this material was decided to appropriate for Wiktionary. Rmhermen 17:55, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep the rewrite.
Sjakkalle 09:39, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:46, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
no such creature as this or grephauin in reality - and google and I agree that neither are notable in fiction-- Doc Glasgow 19:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:15, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Vanity page (posted by K357R31 which is identical to the "nick" used by an Andrew Cimino in registering for a Quake convention); a Google search on this name yields 47 hits, of which only 2 or 3 appear to be this same individual, with nothing to indicate he is notable. RussBlau 19:13, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:12, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Impossible to maintain. Not meaningful. Heavy server load. DVD can mean many thing, e.g. movie DVD, application software DVD, OS DVD, etc-- minghong 19:15, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:46, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Impossible to maintain. Not meaningful. Heavy server load. DVD can mean many thing, e.g. movie DVD, application software DVD, OS DVD, etc-- minghong 19:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:48, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Impossible to maintain. Not meaningful. Heavy server load. Kill dialup users. DVD can mean many thing, e.g. movie DVD, application software DVD, OS DVD, etc-- minghong 19:17, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:46, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Nominated as a speedy due to lack of notability. This is not among the criteria for speedy deletion. No vote from me. Dbiv 19:25, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Article was salvaged from a speedy.
Sjakkalle 09:33, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Tagged for speedy deletion as "vanity" but the article and talk page make some claims to notability so I'm bringing it here. No vote. Kappa 19:32, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:07, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Non-notable as far as I can tell. -- Tothebarricades.tk 19:18, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. If you are the author of the page, please visit this page. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:05, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Vanity. Non-notable. The most notable thing written in the article is that he has a Masters degree in History. Only
Google hits are Wikipedia mirrors and an American 8th grader. --
JamesTeterenko 19:42, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
You gotta give us props though... keeping it up as long as we did! 64.9.5.21 17:55, 17 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:01, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Vanity page. Page was originally created by user "carterartist", and reads like a vanity bio used in "about the artist" or pamphlet blurbs. Cursory Google search yielded no results. -- Mitsukai 20:13, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:58, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Speedy delete. — Theo (Talk) 21:44, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
It was actually a dumb hoax 4 years ago. I apologize for my childish behavior back then and vows that any future contribution to Wikipedia will be constructive. -- WhereIsMarty ( talk) 07:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC) reply
appears to be hoax, Louis-Martin Deguire gets no google hits. Rmhermen 20:34, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:57, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
reads like a hoax page. Google yielded no entries.-- Mitsukai 20:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:39, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
advertising (nomination by Ben-w)
Delete. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 00:48, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Not notable. r3m0t talk 20:51, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:55, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This article has already been speedy deleted 11 times from 1 to 13 May 2005 as nonsense. A vfd decision would make it easier to take further action against its constant recreator. Delete as nonsense/bad joke/vanity/not-notable. -- Henrygb 21:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:44, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This is a copy and pasting of the bylaws of a society. Also a copyright violation of [8], very possibly.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Obvious vanity. José San Martin 22:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. If you are the author of the page, please visit
this page.
EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by
User:SWAdair.
Sjakkalle 10:52, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Text of the article is The name of a fictional character. This article not verifiable because there is no indication of what fictional work this character is from. -- Allen3 talk 22:38, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Original research, not encyclopedic. A google search for "sucanat addiction" produces zero results. Yet another "addiction" article posted by this ip that needs to be deleted. - Jersyko 22:38, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:39, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Reason? POV rant based on non-notable scholarship -- Doc Glasgow 23:24, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Appears to be poetry or lyrics of some sort. May be a copyvio. Kelly Martin 23:28, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:36, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Memorial for non-notable schoolteacher — Wahoofive ( talk) 23:40, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete. Needs some maintenance around the asteroid list pages that link to him though, so that they wont anymore. EvilPhoenix
Weak keep. The guy may be unknown to most people (including me), but to have an asteroid named after you, you have to do something right in this life. The asteroid is real, by the way. Jamyskis 12:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:17, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Self-article is clearly vanity and does not establish notability. Wikipedians should not write articles about themselves. Kelly Martin 23:40, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Dankelley, please visit your talk page. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:07, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Sounds like advertising for a non-notable company's non-notable product. NatusRoma 23:40, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 00:50, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Article just appears to be a advertisement. Sgkay 19:58, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Template:Centralized discussion
This page is a
soft redirect.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was make redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:53, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This was tagged for speedy deletion as vanity, but it doesn't fit any criteria IMO. What happens to surnames these days? Move to wiktionary maybe. Kappa 00:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:22, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Obvious vanity.— Trevor Caira 00:18, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:23, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement, vanity article, attempt at googlebombing ethiotrans.com. Along with the creation of this article, a paragraph was added to Amharic language, informing us that "You can see the list of languages what Ethiotrans is offering by going its web site http://www.ethiotrans.com". — mark ✎ 00:44, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:24, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable. "Not known for any major achievement." I'd say Userfy but he wasn't logged in when he made the page. Nateji77 01:17, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge all of these starships with
List of Starfleet ship classes.
Sjakkalle 08:26, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
A page for a Star Trek starship class that never appeared on screen and was never even mentioned in any episode. AlistairMcMillan 01:29, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (are we just going to take this deletion lying down? er, sorry).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:30, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Dictionary definition, should be moved to wiki dictionary if it is not already there -- B.d.mills ( Talk) 01:30, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP, pending rewrite.
Golbez 01:26, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be a politician of no great import in Canada. Notability is borderline. Kelly Martin 01:31, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
I have now listed it at Copyright problems and put a copyvio template on it, as should have been done when the copyvio was first discovered. A new version can be written at Don Plett/Temp. Rick K 04:58, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Transwikied by Dmcdevit.
Golbez 01:28, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Dictionary definition - redirect to Wiktionary - Tom Barnwell
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedied.
Golbez 01:28, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
vanity page -- B.d.mills ( Talk) 02:01, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedied.
Golbez 01:28, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
This article is about a 'secret' organization. Since secret organizations can not be verified they are generally considered non-encyclopedic. Google hits=0 for most of the material (the acronym B.D.C. has several unrelated meanings), I tried several forms without success. Page was created by an anon and this is the IP's only edit. This may be a hoax. Should be deleted if it can't be verified. RJFJR 02:13, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:28, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable kookery. Let's not all make fun of the crazy kid, now. - Sean Curtin 02:16, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:29, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Original research, not encyclopedic. The term "banana wolfing" returns zero hits on google. There is little scientific evidence to support most of the article's claims, except for the statement "Bananas, being high in tryptophan, have the potential of being a relaxant." Thus, the rest of the article is original research. Since the tryptophan content of bananas is already mentioned in the tryptophan article, this article should be deleted. - Jersyko 02:34, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedied.
Golbez 01:29, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Hilarious. Not only is the title POV, but the list deserves a place on the list of shortest articles (entire text was "Spevack"). This either needs retitling and greatly extending, or getting rid of (and since we already have various lists of surnames by nationality, I'd favour the latter). Grutness... wha? 03:13, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was
Patent nonsense. No hits in google. Samw 03:28, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:34, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
2005 British parliamentary candidate who came in 4th with 4.3% of the vote. The constituency itself was only notable in that the Labour majority was reduced, and the victor seems to be an unordinary MP. Delete. NatusRoma 03:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:30, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
looks to me like a vanity page for his own webpage - delete -- Mariocki TALK 04:14, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:39, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Bandcruft. Notability not established in article. Kelly Martin 04:19, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:31, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Not notable. DJ Clayworth 04:27, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:41, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
tyrenga shows zero google hits and duplicates the Beast of Exmoor article - Merge and redirect with Beast of Exmoor -- Mariocki TALK 04:32, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Beast of Exmoor is outdated and presents this animal as a mythical beast. Photos prove otherwise and a new Zoo-ological name is given to support this. Zero google hits mean absolutely nothing. Try looking up "Bexmoor Cat" which was published in the British tabloids- no hits as well. Merge and redirect Beast of Exmoor article to Tyrenga
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:32, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
vanity band page. "Burning Wench" gets exactly 3 Google hits — Wahoofive ( talk) 04:35, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:35, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
199 google results, copyvio, started by vandal. Lotsofissues 04:39, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Golbez 01:34, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Bob Hayden, chief of an amateur league. 100 hits for name with USA hockey, I'm grouping together because the pages are both started by same vandal. Lotsofissues 04:43, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 00:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Seeming hoax or neologism. Of the 63 Google hits, only a handful are for this meaning. — Wahoofive ( talk) 04:42, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:35, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Metal/punk is a music genre combining metal and punk. Nothing links here. Let's delete it before anything does.— Wahoofive ( talk) 04:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete. I tried to find something appropriate to propose a redirect, such as hardcore punk, Metalcore, or Grunge, but nothing seemed particularly appropriate. Also, the article asserts that punk and metal are seemingly disparate, yet from a brief glance at the punk pages, it does not seeem like that would be true, so I call the accuracy of the article into question as well. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (already transwikied).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:41, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Partial VfD, didn't see where it originated. Article is currently flagged for transwiki. Abstain. R adiant _* 17:39, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:36, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Bandity. "Purple koosh" +Barkmeier gets zero Google hits. Rick K 05:14, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. However, Sherurcij, this wouldn't have happened if you hadn't saved a sub-sub-stub. You ARE allowed to make a full article before hitting Save. --
Golbez 01:37, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Not notable, little useful content -- B.d.mills ( Talk)
Yeah, how about we wait till I actually add content, seeing as how the page was added about 3 minutes ago? The whole purpose of a stub is to give the very minimum of detail until you, or somebody else, has time to add more.
-- Sherurcij 05:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Comment. Sherurcij, I'd like to offer you a friendly encouragement to strive for politeness. I'm sure that calmly explaining here on the Vfd talk page that you will be imminently adding to the article will provide adequate reason for a stay on deletion. You've been on Wikipedia a good while now, and it looks like you've been working hard to make improvements during that time, so well done. I look forward to seeing this article improve in the near future. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (transwikied already).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:43, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Dicdef— Wahoofive ( talk) 05:41, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:38, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
My hoaxometer is blinking... I have not been able to verify this. Can anyone else? I would suggest redirecting this title to Jeff Koons, as it is not an entirely improbable misspelling. Uppland 06:23, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:41, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Band vanity -- Longhair | Talk 08:13, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:54, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Short, unclear. Maybe it should be a stub, maybe it should be cleaned up. -- BradBeattie 12:49, 4 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Should be improved, but NOT deleted. It is a valid reference to a major european party and its history. -- Yafuetodo
It should be improved but we need a GFDL-friendly picture. -- Error 23:56, 8 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Comment: this was nominated on May 5, but not added to the vfd page until now - I'm adding it to today's page to give it full time for discussion. sjorford →•← 08:25, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:58, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Requesting deletion, because Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base (genealogical entries) -- Eponymous Coward 08:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was transwiki.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:50, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Given that this article is written entirely in a non-encyclopedic format about a topic that is non-encyclopedic, I recommend this article for deletion. See What Wikipedia is Not, subsection "Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base." - Barfooz 09:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 16:01, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Advertisement for a company with an annual turnover of 14.2 Million €. If the noteability can't be established and the language toned down a lot, Delete. -- S.K. 11:36, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:42, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be nothing more than a jab at World of Warcraft. Orange Goblin 11:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 16:04, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Neologism, 12 google hits. Thue | talk 11:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. (In the end the debate was about whether to merge or to keep, the keepers are in the majority)
Sjakkalle 12:45, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:42, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
227 google hits for "Fractal jack" does not make them a notable band. I don't think we need an article on every band in existance. Perhaps an article on "Thrash metal bands of Scotland" or something could at least tie them into one article. -- Silversmith 16:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:43, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Probable nonsense, it's not in my rather large OED, answers.com dictionary or my (admittedly old edition second hand) medical dictionary, and gets 47 google results, of which several are wikipedia+mirrors and none appear to be verifiable and look a lot like jokes to me. Joe D (t) 16:36, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Unable to userfy.
Golbez 01:45, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Not notable. (What sport is this, anyway?) Deb 17:12, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect
A misspelling of Georgiana Rizk. 500LL 17:17, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect done. The content was identical. A suspicion of copying from somewhere else. Mikkalai 20:33, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:48, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Does not contain any info that is not in the main Flickerstick article, and does not link to any other pages
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete, already transwikied.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:19, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Not a disambiguation page. I believe this material was decided to appropriate for Wiktionary. Rmhermen 17:52, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete, already transwikied.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:18, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Not a disambiguation page. I believe this material was decided to appropriate for Wiktionary. Rmhermen 17:55, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep the rewrite.
Sjakkalle 09:39, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:46, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
no such creature as this or grephauin in reality - and google and I agree that neither are notable in fiction-- Doc Glasgow 19:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:15, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Vanity page (posted by K357R31 which is identical to the "nick" used by an Andrew Cimino in registering for a Quake convention); a Google search on this name yields 47 hits, of which only 2 or 3 appear to be this same individual, with nothing to indicate he is notable. RussBlau 19:13, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:12, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Impossible to maintain. Not meaningful. Heavy server load. DVD can mean many thing, e.g. movie DVD, application software DVD, OS DVD, etc-- minghong 19:15, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:46, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Impossible to maintain. Not meaningful. Heavy server load. DVD can mean many thing, e.g. movie DVD, application software DVD, OS DVD, etc-- minghong 19:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Golbez 01:48, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Impossible to maintain. Not meaningful. Heavy server load. Kill dialup users. DVD can mean many thing, e.g. movie DVD, application software DVD, OS DVD, etc-- minghong 19:17, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:46, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Nominated as a speedy due to lack of notability. This is not among the criteria for speedy deletion. No vote from me. Dbiv 19:25, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Article was salvaged from a speedy.
Sjakkalle 09:33, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Tagged for speedy deletion as "vanity" but the article and talk page make some claims to notability so I'm bringing it here. No vote. Kappa 19:32, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:07, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Non-notable as far as I can tell. -- Tothebarricades.tk 19:18, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. If you are the author of the page, please visit this page. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:05, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Vanity. Non-notable. The most notable thing written in the article is that he has a Masters degree in History. Only
Google hits are Wikipedia mirrors and an American 8th grader. --
JamesTeterenko 19:42, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
You gotta give us props though... keeping it up as long as we did! 64.9.5.21 17:55, 17 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:01, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Vanity page. Page was originally created by user "carterartist", and reads like a vanity bio used in "about the artist" or pamphlet blurbs. Cursory Google search yielded no results. -- Mitsukai 20:13, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:58, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Speedy delete. — Theo (Talk) 21:44, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
It was actually a dumb hoax 4 years ago. I apologize for my childish behavior back then and vows that any future contribution to Wikipedia will be constructive. -- WhereIsMarty ( talk) 07:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC) reply
appears to be hoax, Louis-Martin Deguire gets no google hits. Rmhermen 20:34, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:57, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
reads like a hoax page. Google yielded no entries.-- Mitsukai 20:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:39, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
advertising (nomination by Ben-w)
Delete. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge/redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 00:48, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Not notable. r3m0t talk 20:51, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:55, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This article has already been speedy deleted 11 times from 1 to 13 May 2005 as nonsense. A vfd decision would make it easier to take further action against its constant recreator. Delete as nonsense/bad joke/vanity/not-notable. -- Henrygb 21:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:44, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
This is a copy and pasting of the bylaws of a society. Also a copyright violation of [8], very possibly.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Obvious vanity. José San Martin 22:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. If you are the author of the page, please visit
this page.
EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by
User:SWAdair.
Sjakkalle 10:52, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Text of the article is The name of a fictional character. This article not verifiable because there is no indication of what fictional work this character is from. -- Allen3 talk 22:38, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Original research, not encyclopedic. A google search for "sucanat addiction" produces zero results. Yet another "addiction" article posted by this ip that needs to be deleted. - Jersyko 22:38, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:39, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Reason? POV rant based on non-notable scholarship -- Doc Glasgow 23:24, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted already.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Appears to be poetry or lyrics of some sort. May be a copyvio. Kelly Martin 23:28, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:36, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Memorial for non-notable schoolteacher — Wahoofive ( talk) 23:40, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete. Needs some maintenance around the asteroid list pages that link to him though, so that they wont anymore. EvilPhoenix
Weak keep. The guy may be unknown to most people (including me), but to have an asteroid named after you, you have to do something right in this life. The asteroid is real, by the way. Jamyskis 12:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:17, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Self-article is clearly vanity and does not establish notability. Wikipedians should not write articles about themselves. Kelly Martin 23:40, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Dankelley, please visit your talk page. EvilPhoenix
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 05:07, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Sounds like advertising for a non-notable company's non-notable product. NatusRoma 23:40, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 00:50, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Article just appears to be a advertisement. Sgkay 19:58, 13 May 2005 (UTC) reply