Template:Centralized discussion
This page is a
soft redirect.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. – AB CD 00:04, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity page - actually sounds like a bad personal ad. SteveW 00:17, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). – AB CD 00:04, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Grenavitar marked this vfd on January 4 as a duplicate of Flessas Family, but never made a subpage or listed it on vfd. I'd just redirect, but since the same anon started both articles and there's thus no GFDL requirement, and this would be quite useless as a redirect, my vote is delete. — Korath ( Talk) 00:05, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. – AB CD 00:04, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Atlantima marked this vfd on March 28, but never made a subpage or listed it on vfd. I'm just listing it here; do not consider this a vote. (Note that the first sentence has already been transwikied to Wiktionary.) — Korath ( Talk) 00:08, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. – AB CD 00:32, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not notable. Looks like a vanity or something close. -- OU812 01:09, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:05, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete - how-to essay concerning somebody's about how to decorate a room. Doesn't belong on wikipedia, and a very misleading article title, too. - DavidWBrooks 19:07, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to
Francis Schaeffer. —
Korath (
Talk) 14:38, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
This unmarked substub mispells its own title -- there is a real article on Francis Schaeffer. Clearly needs to be deleted. Zantastik 07:19, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -
Mailer Diablo 11:32, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
delete, vanity Wikipedian231 13:28, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to
DCPlusPlus. —
Korath (
Talk) 14:41, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete
CDC
(talk) 05:30, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A list of five big record labels, unencyclopedic.-- nixie 00:33, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:06, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ad for high-school students live journal diary, vanity and self-promotion, delete-- nixie 00:41, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was merge/redirect. – Radiant _* 09:58, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Without the word history, which looks suspiciously bogus, this article shrinks down to a dicdef. -- Dcfleck 00:47, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
*Delete as neologism. I really had to do a double-take since that word almost looks like my last name! -
Lucky 6.9 04:47, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:07, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This reads like a promotional flyer for the band. If they are notable enough to be included, this needs to be completely rewritten. -- Dcfleck 00:51, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:07, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
No links, no Google hits, no indication this is anything other than one person's imagination. -- Dcfleck 02:19, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 18:35, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Continuation of Part 1 which no longer exists... [5] srs 02:48, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Zzyzx11 03:13, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not an article, and never will be. This was created as just a place to display images that couldn't be fitted into Liancourt Rocks. Of course deleting this page does not mean deleting the images, so they can be added to any relevant articles. Mark 1 03:23, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. As per Maps from 1700s A.D. above. Mark 1 03:27, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:09, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. An "independent" film that hasn't even been filmed yet. It seems quite a bit below the bar for an entry. Wikipedia is not intended to generate buzz and publicity. Joyous 03:25, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity stub page. Delete. Andrew pmk 03:40, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 11:44, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Original research. Unencyclopedic. Delete. Indrian 03:43, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no concensus. -
Mailer Diablo 11:35, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Defines a race of people in central Europe. After Googling on "Alpine racial" (because I didn't want to dig through a lot of Alpine ski races), I think this is a racial definition used by white power groups.
FreplySpang
(talk) 03:52, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) Change to redirect into
Nordic theory. Thanks for the rewrite, Mustafaa.
FreplySpang
(talk) 12:37, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 22:40, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. No evidence of notability. Userfy.- gadfium 04:17, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:11, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, no evidence of notability.- gadfium 04:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:11, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
In spite of the deceptive title, this is a long page about the colorful life of Eva Silas Davis The format looks like it might be a download from a website like [http:www.soapcentral.com Soap Central] but I get no Google results on "Eva Silas Davis" or on various other names from the article. Hello? Unless someone explains this all, delete. FreplySpang (talk) 04:18, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 11:53, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not quite encyclopedic. /sɪzlæk ˺/ 04:18, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE
CDC
(talk) 16:37, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I feel like a heartless wretch, but there's no actual encyclopedic content here. Delete. FreplySpang (talk) 04:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 12:03, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement. May have a crumb of notability if claim to be "oldest sex toy company on Internet" is true/verifiable. But still an advertisement. Also has a redirect at JT's Stockroom. FreplySpang (talk) 05:35, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). – AB CD 00:12, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neologism/personal jargon. See also Meaningful student involvement. jdb ❋ ( talk) 05:56, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). – AB CD 00:12, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neologism/personal jargon. See also Student voice. jdb ❋ ( talk) 05:55, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE
CDC
(talk) 16:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
vanity, non-notable, apparently just a webpage. possibly redirect to Neo-Druidism. dab (ᛏ) 06:18, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The Druïcca Tradition is a Dutch coven, the main site is in Dutch (druicca.nl) and more will be translated at druicca.org.uk. For the english countries the Druicca Tradition is indeed not more than a webpage. But also in the english speaking countries people have made their own synthesis between neo-druidry and wicca and this is called druicca. There is no athority who can say who is druicca or not, everony who had made his/here own synthesis between druidry and wicca can call him/here self a druicca. No need to be initiated by a coven or whatever. An example of someone with here own synthesis of druidry and wicca is Laurie Cabot (lauriecabot.com), she calls this celtic wicca, I would call it druicca.
The result of the debate was delete all but Central Missouri State University Tower. – AB CD 00:16, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
All these were proposed by User:DaveTheRed with the reasoning: "A planned tower. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". This is a consolidation of all these into one entry. Sjakkalle 07:15, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP
This is a dictionary definition, and I don't see how it can be expanded to be more than this. Thryduulf 10:19, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Blatant advertisment for a school in Malta that teaches English-- nixie 11:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT
Public domain Chinese poem has been moved to Wikisource. The rest is an English translation traced to a 1976 book. It may be PD or not - it's all over the web - but is otherwise a copyvio. Most of what else can be said about the poem is already at Hua Mulan -- Diderot 11:25, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -
Mailer Diablo 11:36, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Defunt game design community, no potential to become encyclopedic, delete-- nixie 11:29, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hoax. Zero google hits for "Griolus dmudus", "Botswana rope", or "Edgar d'Mude". See also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Edgar d'Mude. — Korath ( Talk) 13:07, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Part of the same hoax as Edgar d'Mude and Griolus dmudus, both also on vfd. — Korath ( Talk) 13:11, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:18, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hoax. Zero Google hits. <KF> 13:01, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 12:14, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This person lived in a particular house in
Colonial Williamsburg. Delete as too far removed from notability.
Gazpacho 13:15, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. notability. Hardly she was a single executrix. Accomplishments? Mikkalai 02:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:18, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This band does not appear to currently meet the Notability and Music guidelines. This web page (unclear if this is a fan page or official home page) indicates the band is in the process of recording their first album (a number of MP3 recordings have previously been made). -- Allen3 talk 13:25, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT
There is already an article called Frederiksborg Palace. This page should just be a redirect. Luis rib 13:39, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ok, redirected it. Luis rib 14:14, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was MERGE/REDIRECT
This was proposed by Kine on April 3, but he failed to list it. POV rant. Delete Dsmdgold 13:39, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS.
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 12:20, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Game trivia, delete. Gazpacho 13:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This doesn't sound... real. DS 14:00, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Stage name for a (non-notable?) humorist and motivational speaker DS 14:09, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was TRANSWIKI
CDC
(talk) 16:29, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an orphan and doesn't really seem encyclopediac. I vote delete, unless there is a strong consensus for a transwiki to wiktionary, say. Jonathan Christensen 14:20, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was merge. I have added the Bastard Tetris information to a paragraph in the main Tetris article and converted Bastard Tetris into a redirect to Tetris. Firebug 06:05, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable computer game. Using a Tetris AI algorithm to select hard pieces is not a new idea. Gazpacho 14:13, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 15:03, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
I actually kind of like this page (especially the flag), but I just can't make the case for keeping it. Too obscure. - Litefantastic 14:33, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete
Non-notable. google search for '"simon hollingsworth" poker' gives no pages. delete. Jonathan Christensen 14:49, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The page has now gone and shows as a red link but the talk page is still there -- AYArktos 09:36, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. – AB CD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable, possibly false or vandalism. delete. Jonathan Christensen 14:49, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
VfD banner but no corresponding VfD page. NPOV neologism, in any event. Same author as NPOV rant Best Interest of the Child (which has since been rewritten, but should probably still be redirected). Delete. -- 8^D gab 15:06, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. – AB CD 00:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This collection of pages appears to be redundant with Category:Disambiguation. It seems pointless to have to maintain this index manually when the category does it automatically.
Of course, database queries that rely on these pages will have to be changed. -- Smjg 15:08, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:20, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A "net (record) label" founded in 2005 - looks like vanity or self-promotion to me. CDC (talk) 16:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE
CDC
(talk) 16:27, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Spam, not notable (the game doesn't exist yet). Was previously deleted as a copyvio from [6]; the author has subsequently given a permission to include the text. Still, delete. - Mike Rosoft 16:30, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy delete. – AB CD 00:21, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Yet another surge of Universism, discussed/deleted by VfD twice, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Universism and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Universism 2. No further proofs of notability, verifiability, non- original research are provided. Mikkalai 16:42, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:21, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hoax (no google hits). Was originally marked for speedy deletion; for consistency, I changed it into a regular VfD. (See also Griolus dmudus, Photocryogenesis, and Edgar d'Mude.) Delete all of them, possible speedy deletion candidates as patent nonsense and vandalism. - Mike Rosoft 16:56, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP
CDC
(talk) 16:26, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
User:139.142.154.129 keeps adding various rubbish. Probably a speedy, really as vandalism. SteveW 17:25, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus. -
Mailer Diablo 11:37, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Yet another confirmation of the soundness of the wikipedia policy: no articles about future things. The release of the game is being delayed.
I say delete. No reason to serve as pre-release promotion for as game that cannot even be delivered as promised.Previous discussion (December 2004) is at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl. Mikkalai 17:28, 5 Apr 2005
And to those who deleted my VfD note. I am ready and in my rights to relist this vote every three months, against shameless promotion of non-existing things that even are not done properly. Didin't it come to your mind that the thing may flunk altogether? Mikkalai 17:51, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Footbag club of 26 people. Somewhat vain. Delete. FreplySpang (talk) 17:40, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 22:42, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement for a Web site. — msh210 18:07, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
~~~~
)http://www.brandonvedas.com/press.html
Weak keep. I've heard of it before, and the website is apparently common knowledge among druggies. Not exactly on par with the cultural relevance of Erowid, of which one of the primary purposes of the site is to explore the effect of various drugs on consciousness. This seems to be almost entirely an informational resource, which is fine, but not necessarily wiki-worthy. However, the significance of the site in the drug-using community, it's uniqueness, and its overall popularity make it a keep. Quit with the sock puppets already, people. -- Kaelus 23:45, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:25, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Probably nonsense. DJ Clayworth 18:07, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete (three times).
[8] —
Korath (
Talk) 15:08, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic. Dictdef. Possibly nonsense (I haven't Googled). Delete. — msh210 18:21, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 11:38, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Well-meaning, but this is not an encyclopedia entry; could possibly be transwikied, but with just a few Hebrew words in idiosyncratic transcriptions to English, I am uncertain whether it would be useful in Wiktionary either. / Uppland 19:35, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:26, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind an article about Fanfiction.net or Fictionpress.com, but fanfiction authors aren't notable. If they are I demand my own article ;) Mgm| (talk) 20:15, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:27, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Heartwarming story, but this person gets only 19 Google hits, and the article reads like a promo, possible a copyvio (although nothing turns up on the internet). Improperly named, but I don't want to move it until notability is estabilshed, and not much in the article suggests encyclopedic notability. -- 8^D gab 20:24, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 15:09, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Mistitled book review. Bad idea for a redirect. I suggestion delete. Mgm| (talk) 20:34, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 11:39, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This band has just recorded a demo with two songs, nothing more. They can't be notable, so this article should be deleted. ( Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines) If you are going to search the web about the band, be cautious. There is already a Finnish band Yö, which is very famous there. Also yö is indeed night in Finnish and thus a common word. - Hapsiainen 20:55, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete (eleven times).
[9] —
Korath (
Talk) 15:12, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
probably a speedy candidate, but... (also created 3 times today). – AB CD 21:30, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
i am sorry if this is prying, but I ask that you allow the definition to be left up for 48 hours until I can put up a proper link which decribes Clout more. thank you for your time
it is genuine in the way that it is a real religion, other religions are allowed to be defined on this site, so i ask that clout is also given that right
Are you sure that this person is only one person? mabey this is really a real religion and its followers have now chosen the time to speak out
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 11:40, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Nothing against dentists (or Cincinnati), but this blog does not strike me as possibly rising into notability. -- 8^D gab 21:49, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:29, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be vanity. Only two members. google search for "No white residue" "chengo" gives no results, which may indicate that they are quite unknown, or even nonexistant. chengo is the first word of one of their songs. - Frazzydee| ✍ 21:57, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 11:40, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
No real notability whatsoever. Any relevant/notable information it may have should probably be merged at MobyGames. K1Bond007 22:12, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS.
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 12:32, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:29, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Band vanity. "Striving to become famous" doesn't rate you an encyclopedia article. Rick K 22:34, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:30, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:30, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable suburban cul-de-sac.
Grutness|
hello?
22:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:31, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Also argue that it does not meet the Notability and Music Guidelines. -- Woohookitty 23:57, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Template:Centralized discussion
This page is a
soft redirect.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. – AB CD 00:04, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity page - actually sounds like a bad personal ad. SteveW 00:17, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). – AB CD 00:04, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Grenavitar marked this vfd on January 4 as a duplicate of Flessas Family, but never made a subpage or listed it on vfd. I'd just redirect, but since the same anon started both articles and there's thus no GFDL requirement, and this would be quite useless as a redirect, my vote is delete. — Korath ( Talk) 00:05, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. – AB CD 00:04, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Atlantima marked this vfd on March 28, but never made a subpage or listed it on vfd. I'm just listing it here; do not consider this a vote. (Note that the first sentence has already been transwikied to Wiktionary.) — Korath ( Talk) 00:08, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. – AB CD 00:32, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not notable. Looks like a vanity or something close. -- OU812 01:09, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:05, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete - how-to essay concerning somebody's about how to decorate a room. Doesn't belong on wikipedia, and a very misleading article title, too. - DavidWBrooks 19:07, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to
Francis Schaeffer. —
Korath (
Talk) 14:38, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
This unmarked substub mispells its own title -- there is a real article on Francis Schaeffer. Clearly needs to be deleted. Zantastik 07:19, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -
Mailer Diablo 11:32, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
delete, vanity Wikipedian231 13:28, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to
DCPlusPlus. —
Korath (
Talk) 14:41, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete
CDC
(talk) 05:30, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A list of five big record labels, unencyclopedic.-- nixie 00:33, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:06, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ad for high-school students live journal diary, vanity and self-promotion, delete-- nixie 00:41, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was merge/redirect. – Radiant _* 09:58, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Without the word history, which looks suspiciously bogus, this article shrinks down to a dicdef. -- Dcfleck 00:47, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
*Delete as neologism. I really had to do a double-take since that word almost looks like my last name! -
Lucky 6.9 04:47, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:07, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This reads like a promotional flyer for the band. If they are notable enough to be included, this needs to be completely rewritten. -- Dcfleck 00:51, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:07, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
No links, no Google hits, no indication this is anything other than one person's imagination. -- Dcfleck 02:19, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 18:35, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Continuation of Part 1 which no longer exists... [5] srs 02:48, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Zzyzx11 03:13, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not an article, and never will be. This was created as just a place to display images that couldn't be fitted into Liancourt Rocks. Of course deleting this page does not mean deleting the images, so they can be added to any relevant articles. Mark 1 03:23, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:08, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. As per Maps from 1700s A.D. above. Mark 1 03:27, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:09, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. An "independent" film that hasn't even been filmed yet. It seems quite a bit below the bar for an entry. Wikipedia is not intended to generate buzz and publicity. Joyous 03:25, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity stub page. Delete. Andrew pmk 03:40, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 11:44, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Original research. Unencyclopedic. Delete. Indrian 03:43, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no concensus. -
Mailer Diablo 11:35, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Defines a race of people in central Europe. After Googling on "Alpine racial" (because I didn't want to dig through a lot of Alpine ski races), I think this is a racial definition used by white power groups.
FreplySpang
(talk) 03:52, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) Change to redirect into
Nordic theory. Thanks for the rewrite, Mustafaa.
FreplySpang
(talk) 12:37, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 22:40, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. No evidence of notability. Userfy.- gadfium 04:17, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:11, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, no evidence of notability.- gadfium 04:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:11, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
In spite of the deceptive title, this is a long page about the colorful life of Eva Silas Davis The format looks like it might be a download from a website like [http:www.soapcentral.com Soap Central] but I get no Google results on "Eva Silas Davis" or on various other names from the article. Hello? Unless someone explains this all, delete. FreplySpang (talk) 04:18, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 11:53, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not quite encyclopedic. /sɪzlæk ˺/ 04:18, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE
CDC
(talk) 16:37, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I feel like a heartless wretch, but there's no actual encyclopedic content here. Delete. FreplySpang (talk) 04:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 12:03, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement. May have a crumb of notability if claim to be "oldest sex toy company on Internet" is true/verifiable. But still an advertisement. Also has a redirect at JT's Stockroom. FreplySpang (talk) 05:35, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). – AB CD 00:12, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neologism/personal jargon. See also Meaningful student involvement. jdb ❋ ( talk) 05:56, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). – AB CD 00:12, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neologism/personal jargon. See also Student voice. jdb ❋ ( talk) 05:55, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE
CDC
(talk) 16:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
vanity, non-notable, apparently just a webpage. possibly redirect to Neo-Druidism. dab (ᛏ) 06:18, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The Druïcca Tradition is a Dutch coven, the main site is in Dutch (druicca.nl) and more will be translated at druicca.org.uk. For the english countries the Druicca Tradition is indeed not more than a webpage. But also in the english speaking countries people have made their own synthesis between neo-druidry and wicca and this is called druicca. There is no athority who can say who is druicca or not, everony who had made his/here own synthesis between druidry and wicca can call him/here self a druicca. No need to be initiated by a coven or whatever. An example of someone with here own synthesis of druidry and wicca is Laurie Cabot (lauriecabot.com), she calls this celtic wicca, I would call it druicca.
The result of the debate was delete all but Central Missouri State University Tower. – AB CD 00:16, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
All these were proposed by User:DaveTheRed with the reasoning: "A planned tower. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". This is a consolidation of all these into one entry. Sjakkalle 07:15, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP
This is a dictionary definition, and I don't see how it can be expanded to be more than this. Thryduulf 10:19, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Blatant advertisment for a school in Malta that teaches English-- nixie 11:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT
Public domain Chinese poem has been moved to Wikisource. The rest is an English translation traced to a 1976 book. It may be PD or not - it's all over the web - but is otherwise a copyvio. Most of what else can be said about the poem is already at Hua Mulan -- Diderot 11:25, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -
Mailer Diablo 11:36, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Defunt game design community, no potential to become encyclopedic, delete-- nixie 11:29, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hoax. Zero google hits for "Griolus dmudus", "Botswana rope", or "Edgar d'Mude". See also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Edgar d'Mude. — Korath ( Talk) 13:07, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:17, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Part of the same hoax as Edgar d'Mude and Griolus dmudus, both also on vfd. — Korath ( Talk) 13:11, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:18, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hoax. Zero Google hits. <KF> 13:01, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 12:14, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This person lived in a particular house in
Colonial Williamsburg. Delete as too far removed from notability.
Gazpacho 13:15, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. notability. Hardly she was a single executrix. Accomplishments? Mikkalai 02:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:18, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This band does not appear to currently meet the Notability and Music guidelines. This web page (unclear if this is a fan page or official home page) indicates the band is in the process of recording their first album (a number of MP3 recordings have previously been made). -- Allen3 talk 13:25, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT
There is already an article called Frederiksborg Palace. This page should just be a redirect. Luis rib 13:39, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ok, redirected it. Luis rib 14:14, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was MERGE/REDIRECT
This was proposed by Kine on April 3, but he failed to list it. POV rant. Delete Dsmdgold 13:39, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS.
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 12:20, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Game trivia, delete. Gazpacho 13:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This doesn't sound... real. DS 14:00, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Stage name for a (non-notable?) humorist and motivational speaker DS 14:09, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was TRANSWIKI
CDC
(talk) 16:29, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an orphan and doesn't really seem encyclopediac. I vote delete, unless there is a strong consensus for a transwiki to wiktionary, say. Jonathan Christensen 14:20, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was merge. I have added the Bastard Tetris information to a paragraph in the main Tetris article and converted Bastard Tetris into a redirect to Tetris. Firebug 06:05, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable computer game. Using a Tetris AI algorithm to select hard pieces is not a new idea. Gazpacho 14:13, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 15:03, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
I actually kind of like this page (especially the flag), but I just can't make the case for keeping it. Too obscure. - Litefantastic 14:33, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete
Non-notable. google search for '"simon hollingsworth" poker' gives no pages. delete. Jonathan Christensen 14:49, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The page has now gone and shows as a red link but the talk page is still there -- AYArktos 09:36, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. – AB CD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable, possibly false or vandalism. delete. Jonathan Christensen 14:49, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
VfD banner but no corresponding VfD page. NPOV neologism, in any event. Same author as NPOV rant Best Interest of the Child (which has since been rewritten, but should probably still be redirected). Delete. -- 8^D gab 15:06, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep. – AB CD 00:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This collection of pages appears to be redundant with Category:Disambiguation. It seems pointless to have to maintain this index manually when the category does it automatically.
Of course, database queries that rely on these pages will have to be changed. -- Smjg 15:08, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:20, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A "net (record) label" founded in 2005 - looks like vanity or self-promotion to me. CDC (talk) 16:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE
CDC
(talk) 16:27, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Spam, not notable (the game doesn't exist yet). Was previously deleted as a copyvio from [6]; the author has subsequently given a permission to include the text. Still, delete. - Mike Rosoft 16:30, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy delete. – AB CD 00:21, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Yet another surge of Universism, discussed/deleted by VfD twice, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Universism and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Universism 2. No further proofs of notability, verifiability, non- original research are provided. Mikkalai 16:42, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:21, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hoax (no google hits). Was originally marked for speedy deletion; for consistency, I changed it into a regular VfD. (See also Griolus dmudus, Photocryogenesis, and Edgar d'Mude.) Delete all of them, possible speedy deletion candidates as patent nonsense and vandalism. - Mike Rosoft 16:56, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP
CDC
(talk) 16:26, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
User:139.142.154.129 keeps adding various rubbish. Probably a speedy, really as vandalism. SteveW 17:25, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus. -
Mailer Diablo 11:37, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Yet another confirmation of the soundness of the wikipedia policy: no articles about future things. The release of the game is being delayed.
I say delete. No reason to serve as pre-release promotion for as game that cannot even be delivered as promised.Previous discussion (December 2004) is at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl. Mikkalai 17:28, 5 Apr 2005
And to those who deleted my VfD note. I am ready and in my rights to relist this vote every three months, against shameless promotion of non-existing things that even are not done properly. Didin't it come to your mind that the thing may flunk altogether? Mikkalai 17:51, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Footbag club of 26 people. Somewhat vain. Delete. FreplySpang (talk) 17:40, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 22:42, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement for a Web site. — msh210 18:07, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
~~~~
)http://www.brandonvedas.com/press.html
Weak keep. I've heard of it before, and the website is apparently common knowledge among druggies. Not exactly on par with the cultural relevance of Erowid, of which one of the primary purposes of the site is to explore the effect of various drugs on consciousness. This seems to be almost entirely an informational resource, which is fine, but not necessarily wiki-worthy. However, the significance of the site in the drug-using community, it's uniqueness, and its overall popularity make it a keep. Quit with the sock puppets already, people. -- Kaelus 23:45, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:25, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Probably nonsense. DJ Clayworth 18:07, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete (three times).
[8] —
Korath (
Talk) 15:08, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic. Dictdef. Possibly nonsense (I haven't Googled). Delete. — msh210 18:21, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 11:38, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Well-meaning, but this is not an encyclopedia entry; could possibly be transwikied, but with just a few Hebrew words in idiosyncratic transcriptions to English, I am uncertain whether it would be useful in Wiktionary either. / Uppland 19:35, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:26, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind an article about Fanfiction.net or Fictionpress.com, but fanfiction authors aren't notable. If they are I demand my own article ;) Mgm| (talk) 20:15, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:27, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Heartwarming story, but this person gets only 19 Google hits, and the article reads like a promo, possible a copyvio (although nothing turns up on the internet). Improperly named, but I don't want to move it until notability is estabilshed, and not much in the article suggests encyclopedic notability. -- 8^D gab 20:24, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 15:09, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Mistitled book review. Bad idea for a redirect. I suggestion delete. Mgm| (talk) 20:34, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 11:39, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This band has just recorded a demo with two songs, nothing more. They can't be notable, so this article should be deleted. ( Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines) If you are going to search the web about the band, be cautious. There is already a Finnish band Yö, which is very famous there. Also yö is indeed night in Finnish and thus a common word. - Hapsiainen 20:55, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete (eleven times).
[9] —
Korath (
Talk) 15:12, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
probably a speedy candidate, but... (also created 3 times today). – AB CD 21:30, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
i am sorry if this is prying, but I ask that you allow the definition to be left up for 48 hours until I can put up a proper link which decribes Clout more. thank you for your time
it is genuine in the way that it is a real religion, other religions are allowed to be defined on this site, so i ask that clout is also given that right
Are you sure that this person is only one person? mabey this is really a real religion and its followers have now chosen the time to speak out
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 11:40, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Nothing against dentists (or Cincinnati), but this blog does not strike me as possibly rising into notability. -- 8^D gab 21:49, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:29, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Appears to be vanity. Only two members. google search for "No white residue" "chengo" gives no results, which may indicate that they are quite unknown, or even nonexistant. chengo is the first word of one of their songs. - Frazzydee| ✍ 21:57, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 11:40, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
No real notability whatsoever. Any relevant/notable information it may have should probably be merged at MobyGames. K1Bond007 22:12, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS.
Tony Sidaway|
Talk 12:32, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:29, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Band vanity. "Striving to become famous" doesn't rate you an encyclopedia article. Rick K 22:34, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:30, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:30, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable suburban cul-de-sac.
Grutness|
hello?
22:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. – AB CD 00:31, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Also argue that it does not meet the Notability and Music Guidelines. -- Woohookitty 23:57, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)