- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Loco por vos
- Loco por vos ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, the TV show hasn't aired yet. Also lacks significant coverage in secondary sources. Appears to fail WP:GNG. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Firstly, this was nominated within 7 minutes of creation. Granted, the article's creator has a history of simply creating TV articles and not returning to improve them. That said, I'm inclined to wait to see if this article improves any or if any Argentine visitors could improve, since it goes by two titles and makes sourcing difficult for those of us who have horrible machine translation. If neither conditions occur, then delete. — Wylie pedia 05:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - I'd say that, sure, WP:TOOSOON applies... but on the other hand, it's scheduled to come out within a month, the information appears to be sourced, and the subject is one that is very likely to obtain notability the moment it does come out. Why bother deleting it, only to recreate it, exactly as is, in just a couple weeks? Fieari ( talk) 06:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Loco por vos
- Loco por vos ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, the TV show hasn't aired yet. Also lacks significant coverage in secondary sources. Appears to fail WP:GNG. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Firstly, this was nominated within 7 minutes of creation. Granted, the article's creator has a history of simply creating TV articles and not returning to improve them. That said, I'm inclined to wait to see if this article improves any or if any Argentine visitors could improve, since it goes by two titles and makes sourcing difficult for those of us who have horrible machine translation. If neither conditions occur, then delete. — Wylie pedia 05:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - I'd say that, sure, WP:TOOSOON applies... but on the other hand, it's scheduled to come out within a month, the information appears to be sourced, and the subject is one that is very likely to obtain notability the moment it does come out. Why bother deleting it, only to recreate it, exactly as is, in just a couple weeks? Fieari ( talk) 06:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.