![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2012 May 22. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was merge to Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada. The primary discussion point revolved around claims of notability via WP:GNG/ WP:BASIC rather than WP:POLITICIAN, and the sticking point per policy is the question of whether there are sources each of which must, by policy, provide in-depth coverage. Consensus of those addressing the point was "no", and that consensus is in line with precedent. With non-trivial verifiable information, there's no policy-based reason presented to exclude that content from another appropriate place on Wikipedia, and Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada was the only target suggested. joe decker talk to me 19:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. West Eddy ( talk) 22:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2012 May 22. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was merge to Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada. The primary discussion point revolved around claims of notability via WP:GNG/ WP:BASIC rather than WP:POLITICIAN, and the sticking point per policy is the question of whether there are sources each of which must, by policy, provide in-depth coverage. Consensus of those addressing the point was "no", and that consensus is in line with precedent. With non-trivial verifiable information, there's no policy-based reason presented to exclude that content from another appropriate place on Wikipedia, and Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada was the only target suggested. joe decker talk to me 19:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. West Eddy ( talk) 22:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC) reply