- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Living educational theory
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Living educational theory ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As best I can tell, the article relies largely on a Ph.D. thesis (Barry, 2012) which was never published (see https://www.google.com/books/edition/Qualitative_Research_in_Education/FfnjXiMGvDsC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=barry%202012&pg=PA145&printsec=frontcover). There also seems to be *a lot* of synthesis and/or original research. Finally, I think its notability is questionable; at the very least, I'm concerned that the article is overly focused on Barry's work instead of, say, Whitehead's. BalinKingOfMoria ( talk) 23:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 06:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Per WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH. Also, created mostly by an WP:SPA, which doesn't really contribute to objectivity attempt. Suitskvarts ( talk) 12:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:OR Karnataka ( talk) 22:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Living educational theory
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Living educational theory ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As best I can tell, the article relies largely on a Ph.D. thesis (Barry, 2012) which was never published (see https://www.google.com/books/edition/Qualitative_Research_in_Education/FfnjXiMGvDsC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=barry%202012&pg=PA145&printsec=frontcover). There also seems to be *a lot* of synthesis and/or original research. Finally, I think its notability is questionable; at the very least, I'm concerned that the article is overly focused on Barry's work instead of, say, Whitehead's. BalinKingOfMoria ( talk) 23:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 06:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Per WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH. Also, created mostly by an WP:SPA, which doesn't really contribute to objectivity attempt. Suitskvarts ( talk) 12:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:OR Karnataka ( talk) 22:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.