The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Well....... it would appear that all
Steamhammer/
SPV GmbH releases should be deleted, it would seem that you are playing favorites.
This album meets all requirements for relevancy. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Caryn davis (
talk •
contribs) 23:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)reply
there are two sources shown I will remove the wiki source.... problem solved
There is no evidence given for notability. The source given is "Wikipedia Article: Evildead" which just seems recursive. The source for a Wikipedia article is another Wikipedia article. That just can't be considered good enough. Maybe the page is work in progress, but if nothing better can be found it should be a DeletePupsbunch (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 23:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as none of this suggests solid independent notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 22:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Evildead. Neither of the sources cited is reliable, and I found no other coverage. It's already covered adequately in the band article. --
Michig (
talk) 19:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and redirect to
Evildead. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NALBUM as there is no independant analysis to be found. Also, @
Caryn davis:, if you think those other articles also fail
WP:NALBUM, propose them too!
crh23 (
talk) 20:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect to band. No reason to delete history however.
Hobit (
talk) 08:55, 5 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Well....... it would appear that all
Steamhammer/
SPV GmbH releases should be deleted, it would seem that you are playing favorites.
This album meets all requirements for relevancy. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Caryn davis (
talk •
contribs) 23:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)reply
there are two sources shown I will remove the wiki source.... problem solved
There is no evidence given for notability. The source given is "Wikipedia Article: Evildead" which just seems recursive. The source for a Wikipedia article is another Wikipedia article. That just can't be considered good enough. Maybe the page is work in progress, but if nothing better can be found it should be a DeletePupsbunch (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 23:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as none of this suggests solid independent notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 22:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Evildead. Neither of the sources cited is reliable, and I found no other coverage. It's already covered adequately in the band article. --
Michig (
talk) 19:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and redirect to
Evildead. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NALBUM as there is no independant analysis to be found. Also, @
Caryn davis:, if you think those other articles also fail
WP:NALBUM, propose them too!
crh23 (
talk) 20:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect to band. No reason to delete history however.
Hobit (
talk) 08:55, 5 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.