The result was delete, despite sockpuppetry. Not one valid 'keep' vote. Proto:: type 16:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a nomination for List of Half-Life mods ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and List of Half-Life 2 mods ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).
Both have been nominated for deletion before. List of Half-Life mods was deleted two weeks ago, while List of Half-Life 2 mods was kept in February. List of Half-Life mods was created anew shortly after its deletion. It was tagged with db-repost, but de-tagged following this comment:
This article is not a repost of the original article, in the AfD it was mentioned that it can be created again "if someone wants to turn it into an acceptable article rather than a directory" ( source), also an admin said "this needs to be changed significantly before it is reposted" ( source), which I have done - it is changed significantly. Please compare with the original article. And excuse me if I haven't listed every notable mod already, that's why it's a stub plus I only had a few hours time. -- Pizzahut2 21:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I am opening this discussion in order to achieve a consensus once and for all; should these articles be retained? Both articles, especially List of Half-Life 2 mods still looks more or less like a directory (which Wikipedia is not). Punkmorten 12:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, despite sockpuppetry. Not one valid 'keep' vote. Proto:: type 16:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a nomination for List of Half-Life mods ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and List of Half-Life 2 mods ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).
Both have been nominated for deletion before. List of Half-Life mods was deleted two weeks ago, while List of Half-Life 2 mods was kept in February. List of Half-Life mods was created anew shortly after its deletion. It was tagged with db-repost, but de-tagged following this comment:
This article is not a repost of the original article, in the AfD it was mentioned that it can be created again "if someone wants to turn it into an acceptable article rather than a directory" ( source), also an admin said "this needs to be changed significantly before it is reposted" ( source), which I have done - it is changed significantly. Please compare with the original article. And excuse me if I haven't listed every notable mod already, that's why it's a stub plus I only had a few hours time. -- Pizzahut2 21:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I am opening this discussion in order to achieve a consensus once and for all; should these articles be retained? Both articles, especially List of Half-Life 2 mods still looks more or less like a directory (which Wikipedia is not). Punkmorten 12:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply