The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The reason this should be deleted is because there is a lot of outdated stuff and none of them have any ref sources to them and its unlikely considering majority of the games dont have sources due to them being 30 or 20 years old. So I don't see any reason why we should keep this article. NakhlaMan ( talk) 01:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
with extra materials or content, WP:LISTCRITERIA are much too broad. Collector and limited editions are
promotional tools for the publisher, and items of value for collectors, this matters to a very narrow audience and not encyclopedic — whether or not a game has such special editions matters little for their notablility, fame, or other significance (e.g. technical or artistic merit). Special editions on their own are not independently notable. Fails WP:NLIST, scope is so broad that it is unlikely to be
discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sourcesother than as passing mentions, WP:SIGCOV not likely outside of actual directories or databases dedicated to this subject. — 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 ( talk) 13:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The reason this should be deleted is because there is a lot of outdated stuff and none of them have any ref sources to them and its unlikely considering majority of the games dont have sources due to them being 30 or 20 years old. So I don't see any reason why we should keep this article. NakhlaMan ( talk) 01:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
with extra materials or content, WP:LISTCRITERIA are much too broad. Collector and limited editions are
promotional tools for the publisher, and items of value for collectors, this matters to a very narrow audience and not encyclopedic — whether or not a game has such special editions matters little for their notablility, fame, or other significance (e.g. technical or artistic merit). Special editions on their own are not independently notable. Fails WP:NLIST, scope is so broad that it is unlikely to be
discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sourcesother than as passing mentions, WP:SIGCOV not likely outside of actual directories or databases dedicated to this subject. — 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 ( talk) 13:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)