From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Joe ( talk) 11:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply

List of uniformed groups in Singapore schools

List of uniformed groups in Singapore schools (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable list of data with no context. This list is in addition to a list of schools in Singapore. Poorly sourced with likely accuracy problems. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as a non notable cross categorisation. Plus there are no sources to verify uniform requirement. Ajf773 ( talk) 23:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Took me a minute to figure out what the article was about, but it seems to be a crosscat of which schools host which co-curriculars. Even if there was coverage, I don't think the subject as a whole would be notable, more any of the individual programs. Navigational purpose is limited, and most of the list is duplicated at Co-curricular_activity_(Singapore)#Uniformed groups anyway. I'd say the list topic would only be notable if we could create an article about the concept of a "uniformed group", and in that case we'd want an article, not a list with the content limitations of that format. Alpha3031 ( tc) 05:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, concur with Alpha3031. The list is essentially impossible to fully source, and for some reason is limited to secondary schools when UGs exist in primary schools and tertiary institutions. ~  KN2731 { talk · contribs} 10:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Joe ( talk) 11:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply

List of uniformed groups in Singapore schools

List of uniformed groups in Singapore schools (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable list of data with no context. This list is in addition to a list of schools in Singapore. Poorly sourced with likely accuracy problems. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 22:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as a non notable cross categorisation. Plus there are no sources to verify uniform requirement. Ajf773 ( talk) 23:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Took me a minute to figure out what the article was about, but it seems to be a crosscat of which schools host which co-curriculars. Even if there was coverage, I don't think the subject as a whole would be notable, more any of the individual programs. Navigational purpose is limited, and most of the list is duplicated at Co-curricular_activity_(Singapore)#Uniformed groups anyway. I'd say the list topic would only be notable if we could create an article about the concept of a "uniformed group", and in that case we'd want an article, not a list with the content limitations of that format. Alpha3031 ( tc) 05:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, concur with Alpha3031. The list is essentially impossible to fully source, and for some reason is limited to secondary schools when UGs exist in primary schools and tertiary institutions. ~  KN2731 { talk · contribs} 10:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook